Example Of A Legal Case Study

Frank and Sharon have been married for 5 years. Unbeknownst to Frank, Sharon has been running an escort service out of the local pub. Sharon did not report her net income from the service on their current return, which would have increased their tax liability by $50,000. Frank is unable to locate any of Sharon’s earnings from her side job.

Per the order received, the court suspended this case effective 1/11/17, with the NCP order to pay $350.00 per month on arrearage owed as of the suspension date.Fiscal reviewed case accounts; case overcharged by six months at the rate of $449.00 per month. . Therefore, the WC account balance was adjusted to $0.00 and the WA account balance was adjusted to $17,215.13. Caseworker A. Brant submitted the fiscal request.

On 08/18/2015, Barbara Feeman contacted Pasco Sheriff`s Office by telephone to report a Petit Theft.

Felipe was a first grader at Littlewood Elementary School. English is his second language and Portuguese is his primary language. Felipe is fluent in speaking, listening, reading, and writing in the English language.

There has been a matter at my school that I would like to make you aware of. This matter has several components that may need further attention from our litigation department. Smart Sue has complained about possible drugs intended for distribution both in her classmate’s, Risky Ralph, locker and in his car. This is the culmination of issues between Smart Sue and an afterhours religious group that Risky Ralph leads. After some investigation and applying the ruling from Donovan v Punxsutawney, I have determined that the religious group has not violated the separation of church and state laws which Smart Sue alleges they did. Their club is held after school and any religious materials they hand out occurs during lunch, which is a

Exercising personal jurisdiction over SET would not comport with due process under either federal or Illinois constitutions, because Plaintiff cannot meet the standard to satisfy the federal due process requirements. Federal due process requires Plaintiff to establish: “(1) the nonresident defendant had ‘minimum contacts’ with the forum state such that there was ‘fair warning’ that the nonresident defendant may be hauled into court there; (2) the action arose out of or related to the defendant's contacts with the forum state; and (3) it is reasonable to require the defendant to litigate in the forum state.” Keller, 834 N.E.2d at 936.

Assistant Superintendent Denise Bartlett presented the first reading of proposed revisions that combine the policy and regulations into one document. She reported that with the guidance from legal counsel, the language in the policy is very explicit as to the requirements of administrators, as well as law enforcement when involved in student interviews and arrests. Dr. Bartlett reviewed the revised policy that has been reworked with headings and subheadings to assist administrators in determining which section of the policy may pertain to a specific incident and the revisions of the exhibits.

This case involves the arrest of Suspect Andre Doss for driving on an expired driver’s license in violation of CVC 12500(a)-Unlicensed Driver. The suspect was cited out.

In the Lethbridge, Mock Court trial the charged that was laid, and was to prove by the Crown took place under Section 445 (1) (b) of the Criminal code that entails, everyone who willfully and without lawful excuse places poison in such a position that it may easily be consumed by dogs, birds or animal that are not cattle and are kept for a lawful purpose (Justice Laws Website, 2018). The elements the accused satisfied within the offence consisted of, willfully and without reasonable cause, which directly relates to accused establishing the mens rea, one of three points to prove needed by the crown to successful convict the accused (Murray, 2018). The next element the accused was arraigned with, is placing poison in a position that is easily accessible for consumption by animals other than cattle (Murray, 2018). In addition, this establishes the actus reus of the actions the accused took in undertaking this offence. Identify was established through oral testimony, by the questions raised by the Crown (Murray, 2018).

Civil cases are when citizens are suspected of committing a crime, while criminal cases are when people with a criminal background are suspected of committing a crime. In a criminal case prosecutors look for undeniable proof in order to easily jail criminals. In civil courts, the goal of a lawyer is to find as much evidence as possible in favor of their position. People in civil courts are not necessarily criminals. They just want to win some money from the court case. There are no prosecutors or government lawyers in a civil court because people are just suing each other. There is a jury in criminal courts to decide whether or not the suspect is guilty or innocent.

I would hire Jody because she is a “certified physician coder through AAPC” that is required by state and federal law. When an agency or organization performs a review and grants recognition to an institution that meets specific standards; which are required, it is accredited. This accreditation process is done so that facilities can pinpoint when organizations do “not” meet these standards and to endorse those that “do” meet these standards by state and federal laws.

Joseph purchased two commercial ovens for his restaurant and paid via Paypal. At first, the ovens seemed acceptable however it soon became apparent that the hinges on the doors weren’t installed properly making it impossible for the doors to close properly. After contacting the seller and alerting them of the issue they have offered to have a repairman go onsite and correct the defect however Joseph wants to return the ovens and receive a refund in full. Joseph would like to know if there is a warranty and if so, what the terms are. He would also like to know which remedy is more likely under the circumstances.

3. How could a section 1983 action be brought where an officer in the locker room preparing for off duty accidentally discharged his revolver, striking a custodian? What would be the justification for a lawsuit in this case? The officer was wrong in this accidental discharge. Police are responsible for the fire arm and even if the officer didn’t shoot someone you are supposed to be able to control the fire arm. This was an accident not meant to hurt someone but if you can’t control a gun you shouldn’t be able to carry one. Negligence like this could kill someone on accident. Officers should treat every gun as they are dangerous because like shown in this case they can hurt someone. He could say it was an accident but if I was the custodian

I was dispatched to Foxcroft Apartments as a backup unit for Ofc Eagan in reference to a domestic dispute. As I came on scene Ofc Eagan saw Rodney Russaw leaving from the apartment and became involved in a foot pursuit with the suspect. Ofc. Eagan and I pursed Russaw down Henderson St into the wood line. Ofc Eagen placed Russaw under arrest for trespassing, and transported Russaw to Troy City Jail.

Kate is the owner of a successful business, selling women’s shoes. Her business is expanding fast and she wants to upgrade her business structure to a more appropriate one. What would be your recommendation to Kate and why? What are the factors that influence you with this advice?