Example Of A Quasi-Experimental Review

From personal experience, I have witnessed several family members undergo chemotherapy. Often their side effects of the treatment were worse than the disease itself. Effects, varying form person-to-person, ranged from nausea and

Ph.D. degree acquired authors, Ronald L. Blount, Ronald T. Brown, and Natalie C. Frank, conducted a study focused on predictors of the overall psychological adjustment in children who are battling cancer. They concentrated on anxiety and depression levels and how the child externalizes behavior. There were 83 children who participated in this study of ages ranging from 7 to 18 years. After obtaining parental and child consent, the researchers proceeded to give each

Yarbro, C., Wujchik, D., & Gobel, B. (2010). Cancer Nursing: Principles and Practice (7th ed.). : Jones & Bartlett Learning.

This study was reviewed, and approved by the institutional review board. This used a functional assessment of the chronic illness therapy, which was abbreviated as, (FACIT). This is a measurement system, which consists of a collection of quality of life questions, concentrated in the management of different chronic illnesses. Patients registered, read, and agreed to the study, and grant permission to participate in the study on the website, www.facit.org. After participants met the criteria for the study, those completed a self-report of questions which had evaluated the fatigue and spiritual well-being of the patient. Within this prospective study, the patients were at one point screened during the time of the cancer being active treatment. (1.

In their article“Assessment of Distress and Quality of Life of Cancer Patients Over the Course of Chemotherapy”, they hope to inform potential cancer nurses about the pain that different patients of different backgrounds go through. They record the pain and quality of life from before treatment begins, while treatment is going on, and after treatment. The authors do not explain how adolescents thought process help or inhibit them from making the right choice, but it shows that they are taking the what the patients say to heart. This is the reason that I chose this article. Also the range of education varied through the study participants. Some patients only had a level of elementary school. If these people are capable enough to not only understand the consequences of treatment , but they also understood the conditions of the study that they are participating in. This article also seems helpful because it is a part of a peer reviewed academic journal. So it is understood that the two author really know what they are talking about.

Cancer is not to be taken lightly. This disease does happen to a number of people all over the world every day. A thorough understanding of cancer is vital. This education will provide patients and their loved ones with crucial information about available treatments and how best to cope with the effects of having cancer. This article contains much advice on helping cancer patients cope with the deadly disease.

Distress is an unpleasant emotional experience of a psychological, social and/or spiritual nature that might interfere with the ability to cope effectively with cancer, its physical symptoms and the treatment that occurs, before, during and/or after the diagnosis (NCCN, 2003). In the Psychosocial aspect of cancer patients and their diagnosis, the distress thermometer is a tool that can help both the patients and staff in beginning a conversation with each other about difficulty going on before or after a cancer diagnosis. People who are at a higher risk of heightened distress, are people with subordinate cancer diagnosis, in reoccurring cancer patients, in younger patients, and in married people.

The researcher will use the convenience sampling method to approach the participants and describe the study when the caregiver accompanies a patient to visit oncology clinics after discharged from the initial cancer treatment. Interested caregivers will sign up informed consent and assess with Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

According to the American Cancer Society, some children may have social or emotional issues that should be dealt with during and after treatment. Children may have problems with normal functioning and school work, depending on their age. Doctors or a cancer team can suggest special support programs and services to help children after treatment, but many of these problems can be overcome by support and encouragement. Experts suggest that cancer patients that are in school should attend it as much as they can. This can help keep friends informed about what is going on, and it also helps patients keep a daily routine. Even though friends are great for support and encouragement, parents and patients should realize that people have misinterpretations and worries about cancer. Because of this, some cancer centers have school re-entry programs. These programs allow health teachers to visit the school and teach children about diagnosis, treatment, and challenges the cancer patient may face. These health teachers also answer questions from students and teachers. Some cancer centers that treat many patients may have a program that allows cancer patients and their families to meet people who have finished treatments for leukemia. These programs can give not only the patient but the family a sense of what it is going to be like during and after treatments, and this can be very important for them. The patient isn’t the only one that suffers emotionally and in other ways, the parents and other family members are also affected. Concerns include: financial problems, traveling to and staying near cancer centers, job loss, and a need for home schooling. Social workers or other specialized in family therapy can help families cope with all of these problems. Most of the time, during treatment the patients and families are focused on beating the cancer, but after

Psychosocial distress. The literature revealed the majority of cancer patients experience distress; with breast cancer having the highest levels of psychological distress (Cicero et al., 2009; Diallo et al., 2015; Przezdziecki et al., 2013; Segrin & Badger, 2014). Distress can come from the spouse directly or indirectly related to sexual intimacy or relational communication (Levy, 2010; Pillai-Freidman & Ashline, 2015). Distress can come from a lack of social support as the length of time from cancer diagnosis to survivorship increases, leading to complex emotions, not discussed with the primary care provider (Mikkelsen, Sondergaard, Jensen, & Olesen, 2008; Morasso et al., 2010). Breast cancer survivors specifically, identify their psychological distress needs on-going

This preliminary study shows that patient ADLs declines not significantly and their self-efficacy is maintained with physical support by the end of this study. To maintain and improve the quality of life for inpatient palliative care, symptom control

Mary is a cancer patient who has been diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer. Currently, she has been prescribed with medications and is being followed up on a monthly basis. However, Mary has become reluctant in seeking further medical attention and changing her medications. She has also denied experiencing pain. This could all be due to the fear of dealing with side effects from certain medications, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. It may also be due to having a decreased quality of life with continuous medications, becoming addicted to her pain medications as well as the fear of her three young children seeing her medications. Moreover, Mary could be reluctant to changing medications due to thinking that a stronger dose or a new drug may cause her condition to become worse.

The majority of cancer patients are distressed due to their health status despite the advancement of new technologies for cancer treatment. These patients are emotionally disturbed which in turn contributes to psychiatric problems such as anxiety and depression. The findings of this study show the significance of assessing the psychological conditions of cancer patients before treatment. This calls for the healthcare providers to not only provide treatment to the cancer patients, but also assess their psychological status. This would assist in minimizing the psychiatric symptoms while delivering effective care treatment among the cancer patients. In case, the conditions become worse, the oncologists can refer the patients to psychologists

Research has been dedicated to improving EOLC for children with cancer. Wolfe et al. (2000) states that greater attention to symptom control and overall well-being of children with cancer can help ease suffering. Medical professionals should also recognize this problem and be more proactive when communication with parents, which will ultimately lead to a better quality of life for children who are dying of cancer. The assessment and management of symptoms in children are difficult to measure and there are few reliable and valid methods for measuring the suffering and quality of life for children with cancer. In a study that was conducted in a single institution, it was found that symptoms at the EOL was reported by parents more often than physicians, the children in the study suffered “a lot’ and the treatment of symptoms was ineffective (Himelstein et al., 2004). According to the parents, physicians mainly focused on the physical symptoms of the child. Most of the psychological symptoms of both the child and the parent were not acknowledged by health professionals (Theunissen et al., 2007). Despite this result, there have been substantial research conducted to create measures that can gauge the quality and effect of palliative care mostly for adults. However, data collected from these studies may be

There were a few limitations in this study one of them being that the study was conducted on a small sample size consisting of 30 women therefore, the results cannot be applied to all women who may be suffering for breast cancer or any cancer for that matter (Binns-Turner et al., 2011). Furthermore, the results can only pertain to women, and not men who may be diagnosed with breast cancer (Binns-Turner et al., 2011). Another limitation is that there is a possibility of the Hawthorne effect where the results may be skewed or biased because the women were aware that they were being studied (Binns-Turner et al., 2011). Additionally, the scale used to measure anxiety levels was the Spielberger State Anxiety Scale and the Visual Analog Scale was used to measure pain. These are self – reported scales which offer no objective measurements and can have different meanings for different people.