Example Of An In-Group Video Analysis

The presence of other people affects the behavior of an individual. As the group changes in size the social interactions change. Dyads and triads are the smallest. The people in these small groups have intense interaction .It is more stable than the other social groups. When the group becomes big an organization or a community is formed. The way it operates changes. The interaction is less intense as people have attention from different people. At this level, the need for a leader emerges.

“Leadership is a process of social influence, which maximizes the efforts of others, towards the

The “in” groups are those who share our qualities of said group and the rest are the “out” group. Such schema is often determined by factors intrinsic to who people are such as sex, race, and ethnicity. Groupings like this can increase discrimination when outside events exacerbate the sentiment toward both parties, driving a wedge even further. In the film, the families all group anyone who is Indian into the “in” group once they have moved to America but within their “in” group there are more spheres that are created such as the “in” group who are religious Indians who have lived in India or the “in” group who are related by marriage (Nair). The same exists in the short stories whereby the “in” group is automatically anyone who is Vietnamese but, for example, for Kim that group is further divided into those who were in foster care with her and the shop owner she so quickly moved into the “out” group after unknowingly projecting her feelings of abandonment from her parents into that

The people around them are the ones that are following every order they receive with out hesitating, so in reality they are changing to believe whatever the leader tells them to do. In "Group

As social workers, we have to our best to make sure our clients are as living as substantial as ethical and possible as we can. The Aboriginal’s in this video have and are currently fighting a battle to keep their cultural ways alive. They are also trying to be included in discussion making and as a part of their state. The claim if they are not included as in their state they will make their own. If I was a social worker in this area, I will surely have to make sure to stay as bias and professional as possible. I am Native American; therefore, this situation touches me to the bone. I would have to make sure I would not break professional boundaries while helping such clients. In doing so, I will also make sure I use personal knowledge

In this History of Social Work video I couldn’t believe how the government never really took a step in. in order to help all the unemployed and homeless people in time of great need but instead they were federally funding other things that in my opinion weren't as important as the unemployed and homeless. The situation was so bad that it lead loss of homes, loss of families, suicide and starvation. And once the government started helping people they became dependent. Instead of going out and looking for jobs while receiving welfare they just depended on it. Which was opposite of the objective that the government had proposed. I feel people should have worked hard to find jobs and we could avoided that whole gap between the rich and the poor

The role of the follower and the quality of the relationship itself are informally negotiated between followers and their leaders over time (Gils, Quaquebeke, & Knippenberg, 2009). Based on the LMX theory, leaders build a special relationship with an inner circle, or “in-group”, of followers, who often get high levels of responsibility and access to resources. The in-group members work harder and are more committed to task objectives. They are also expected to be totally committed and loyal to their leader. Conversely, other followers fall in the “out-group" and are given low levels of choice or influence. Aggression, sarcasm and a self-centered view are qualities seen in the out-group. The quality of the LMX relationship varies and is better when the challenge of the job is extremely high or extremely low (Graen et al., 1982).

Groups talk about goals in different ways, using different words. Some groups have major and minor goals or meta- and micro-goals; others divide goals into mission, purpose or goal, and objectives, while other groups talk about aims and expectations. A group is strengthened to the extent it has clear goals and all members know what their roles are in helping to achieve them (Dimock and Kass, 2008, p.62-63). My placement is currently in the Mental Health field and as mental health workers we have groups that are organized to promote to mental health of all and to support the resilience and recovery of people experiencing mental illness.

Leadership is a process of influencing activities of a particular group of people with the aim of attaining certain stipulated goals. In defining leadership there is need to consider a particular group, the common goals and the duties that are allocated to specific members of the group depending on their abilities (Fiedler 1976). Leadership therefore cannot successfully occur unless members of the group are given different considerations in terms of personality, traits and responsibilities. In considering leadership, it is important to look at the leader, the group or organization they are leading, the members as individuals and the situation; these are

The difference in how Oles evaluate themselves in comparison to another Ole versus a random college student can also be attributed to the polarization principle of how we perceive out-group members in comparison to in-group members, according to Linville and Jones. An in-group is a social group an individual belongs to and identifies as being a member of. While on the contrary an out-group is a social group an individual does not belong to. These groups are usually formed in regards to race, gender, religion, age, and even trivial preferences. Hence, in this particular case, an Ole would be considered as a member of the in-group, while a Carl or any other college student is part of the out-group. Through the polarization principle, Linville

Leadership is a strong quality that can be possessed with some innate personality traits that consists of influencing others in beliefs, behaviors, or opinions to all reach a common goal. There are two forms of leadership, formal and informal. Formal leadership occurs when someone is appointed to a position of authority. Informal leadership may not have professional authority, but shows a significant amount of impact in the group influenced. (Cherry, Jacob, 2017) Joan Marques discusses mean leadership modules that are used throughout different facilities. When

As one observes society, there is a very distinct way of life when it comes to who associates with who and why they do so. In society there are social groups, simply defined by our lecture notes as a group of “two or more people who interact with one another and who share a common identity.” Social groups can be further observed into subdivisions known as reference groups, primary groups, secondary groups, and even more specifically “in-groups” and “out-groups.” Other topics that can be observed about a society is the rate in which people conform to society which was studied by a man named Solomon Asch, and leadership styles that are present, in which there are three different kinds. One last topic, related to leadership, that should be noted about a society is that there are five levels of leadership that every leader needs to know.

Organizations , and groups all depend on the people in the group to run efficiently. In every group there are leaders that others depend on to take charge, and get things done. These leaders show others how to act by following the rules that are enforced in that particular group. In any type of organization people have to be willing to adhere to the agreements, listen to their superior, and have the skill of persuasion.

A social group is two or more individuals who interact with each other and share similar norms, beliefs, and expectations . An in-group and out-group are different. While an in-group is one that members feel respect and likeness with, an out-group contains individuals that a member feels a sense of competition or dislike for.

We as humans tend to relate to those that are similar to us, and tend to alienate those that we deem as different than us. Whether it is by race, gender, culture, or religion, it is something that is almost always present in human interactions, and often times can be completely subconscious. In our textbook Interpersonal Communication by Kory Floyd, an ingroup is defined as “A group of people with whom one identifies.” An outgroup is conversely defined as “A group of people whom one does not identify.” Henri Tajfel first coined this terminology while he was working to devise his social identity theory. These ideas of classifying people into ingroups and outgroups can lead to many