Example Of Reconciliation In Sociology

The other main theme the film focused on was the stereotyping of aboriginal peoples. I felt the film did an excellent job in addressing this issue. At the beginning it stated, “half of urban Canadians say they have little or no contact with Aboriginal people, but when they do its often negative” (CBC 8th Fire). By opening their argument by describing the current day stereotypes from people of all ethnicities, it allowed them to prove that the stereotypes of the native peoples are static and unchanged since the time of colonization. “Nearly 400 years of colonial contact has plunged many Aboriginal peoples into disarray and despair” (Fleras 170), because the attitudes of Canada’s towards the First Nation’s people have never changed. At the time of colonization, the natives received many negatives

Forgiveness is the key part to peace. Peace is only achievable when one does not have negative emotions towards another. Those who have forgiven are also given a chance for peace. When you give forgiveness, you receive peace. Peace and forgiveness are closely intertwined and affect one another. The relationship they share is inseparable and closely related.

Reconciling with someone is restoring trust when the trust has been broken or damaged. Forgiveness either decisional or emotional is what happens within a person and reconciliation takes place between two people. To reconcile with someone is to present good behavior over (x) amount of time, until a point is reached and trust can be restored. Everett also teaches couples how to forgive their spouse and reestablish trust in their relationships using the Hope-Focused approach which is composed of two sides. The first side is FREE (Forgiveness and Reconciliation through Experiencing Empath) and the second is HOPE (Handling Our Problems Effectively). Research has been conducted on both approaches and has proven to be valid.

“However, Aboriginal people still struggle for more than words on paper. They require the enactment of visible justice, where aboriginal people have a pride of place and heritage that can be shared as well as respected.” (king, 2010, p.216).

Attending my first Native American powwow was a very intriguing cultural experience to be apart of, and that I was grateful I was able to attend. This was an event that I would not have attended if it were not for this project and I ended up learning a lot about this culture that is around us. Every Native American tribe has their own version of this culture, however, all tribes gather in a powwow, a cultural event that strengthens the unity of the tribe. My informants name is Gary Watson, an elderly man, who has attended powwows for many years. He and his wife were participants in the powwow this year and were also there to watch their grandchildren participate for the first time. I

Due to the damage the Acts, policies, and treaties had towards Aboriginal individuals, communities, and cultures, there has been a focus on the reconciliation. The Acts, policies, and treaties have created a deep mistrust on the part of First Nations people towards the government. Especially the impact of the Indian Act, which led so many children to suffer as they were abused physically, emotionally, spiritually, and mentally while attending the Residential Schools. Thus, it is important to heal the relationship and come to a point where non-Natives support the Aboriginal people in the healing process and revitalizing the cultural and linguistic traditions that have been lost. Although there has been an apology by the Prime Minister of Canada and a promise to renew the relationship with Aboriginal people by our current government, Justin Trudeau, the Acts, policies, and treaties are still being used to put Aboriginal people in a disadvantaged position. For example, Indian Act, although amended, is still being used. The interview with one activist who is camping outside INAC office states, "We need to dismantle the Indian Act. We want to have our own affairs. We want to be able to negotiate better. The Indian Act just spreads more colonialism". Further as Thomas King states in the video, “Things haven 't changed... Still abrogate treaties..still losing land. The methodology has changed, but attitude has not changed.” This shows that there are still works to be done with

According to Gunstone (2016), the most prominent issue was the confusion surrounding the meaning of 'reconciliation'. There were three main factors contributing to this confusion. First, the CAR failed to articulate a clear definition of reconciliation, broadly describing the term with phrases such as 'working together' and 'building bridges' (Tatz, 2000, p. 75). Second, there was a multitude of differing (sometimes conflicting) definitions endorsed by various advocacy groups and organisations (McGuinness, 2000). Finally, the debates surrounding the importance of symbolic and practical reconciliation following the election of the Howard Government made many people question some of the diverse issues related to reconciliation (Howard,

While talking things out family and community members will explain to the offender how they have violated tradition and failed to fulfill the expectation of their role as a family or community member and how it has impacted them. Brown’s description of the peacemaking process is similar to Pinto’s which is illustrated via a table comparing three model’s of dispute resolution. The table clearly shows the importance of Navajo tradition in peacemaking and how it is reflected in each step of the process via a healing ceremony and focusing on restoring harmony to the community.[8] Pinto also includes three pages detailing the seven steps and components of the peacemaking process. The outline format makes the process easy to understand and reinforces many points brought up by the other two authors. Meyer describes the peacemaking process in terms similar to Brown and Pintos, but compares the Navajo process to other tribal resolution methods. Using the Ojibwe example of cleansing the spirits of offenders and victims of

On February 13th, 2008, indigenous and aboriginal people across all of Australia were deeply moved and in tears; The Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd, had finally apologised the Stolen Generations in his ‘sorry’ speech. The Apology was an important step towards rebuilding respectful and new relationships between indigenous and non-indigenous Australians, and to honour and apologize to stolen generations. Many Australians believe that respectful relationships are essential if we are to solve persistent problems. But poll results can sometimes show otherwise. We will see how the media saw the ‘sorry’ apology, how aboriginal and non- indigenous people felt and how they received the apology and also check out poll results. We will

Sitting through this event made me realize that many people fail to recognize Native Americans for who they really are. Native Americans tend to be overlooked

The media message which has been chosen is Kevin Rudd’s ‘ Apology to Australia's Indigenous Peoples’ speech. On Wednesday the 12th of February 2008, Australia’s prime minister, at the time, delivered an official apology to the Indigenous peoples who were taken from families and communities throughout the 19th and 20th centuries in Australia. In this speech, Kevin Rudd, the Australian prime minister is giving a painstaking apology to the stolen generations and the aboriginals for their sorrow, pain and loss. After many years of suffering Rudd brings up this sensitive topic and is giving a speech with functions and effects which makes the intention of the speech reach the audience on a passionate way with strong feelings.

2. According to the article, forgiveness is granting unconditionally grace to those who have cause suffering and pain and accepting what they did and not letting that affect the love they show to that person. Forgiveness is central for racial reconciliation because forgiveness is the first step of mending the relationship with others. It also allows God to do a work between the two groups. When there is forgiveness God can change hearts and create amazing things to happen out of tragedies.

The concept of reconciliation is well known amongst Aboriginal peoples living in Canada. For many Aboriginal peoples, it means the wiping out of seven generations of tradition, culture, trust and a way of life. The Encarta Dictionary defines Reconciliation as “The reconciling of People; the ending of conflict or renewing of a friendly relationship between disputing people or groups.” Reconciliation in Canada is about healing. Injustices inflicted to Aboriginal peoples in Canada have been cited by the Truth and Reconciliation commission of Canada (TRC) to cover the past seven generations.

Negotiated forgiveness consists of the perpetrator and the victim to confront one another and discuss the motives and understand the perpetrator’s intentions. With the dialogue between the two opposing parties, reconciliation can finally emerge. Kraft states the need for negotiated forgiveness, “In the context of truth commissions, unilateral forgiveness is forgiveness, and negotiated forgiveness is reconciliation. During truth commissions, forgiveness appears as an internal disengagement from the perpetrator, independent of the actions of the perpetrator. In contrast, reconciliation is a dialectical process of acceptance, involving direct interactions between perpetrators and victims,” (Kraft 115). This is why reconciliation is extremely important, to resolve reconciliation is essential in promoting peace. With a strong understanding of the contrast between forgiveness and reconciliation, one can intensely evaluate the process of reconciliation during the events of the TRC.

Michael R. Marrus argues that there are four contexts that need to be addressed when trying to develop a strategy for reconciliation. These are political, legal, material, and cultural. These different areas of concern