Example Of The Eucharist

Having very traditional beliefs, the Catholic Church uses numerous different terms and practices that are not familiar with non-Catholics. Inside of the Discourse community, Catholics have set terms that are used widely to discuss different matters. For instances, the term “priest” is used to describe what others would typically call a “pastor.” In addition to the terms used, there are also rituals that are based on their traditional beliefs. The most drastic of them would be the Eucharist. This tradition is referred to by Catholics as “Holy Communion” and is referred to by protestants as “The Lord’s Supper.” Meg Kane described the differences by saying, “Catholics actually believe that the Eucharist is the body and blood of Christ. It has much more meaning behind it than other communion services.” (Kane). Drastically differing from other religions, Catholics believe that their priest was granted the ability by God to turn the bread and wine into the body and blood of Jesus Christ.

The Eucharist is for people in modern times to commemorate Jesus' life. The earliest written gospel of the "Eucharista" meaning 'thanksgiving' in Greek is located in the First Epistle to the Corinthians around 55 AD in which Paul wrote to the apostles " eating the bread and drinking the cup of the lord by all and celebrating what is named the supper of the lord". This historical

The Eucharist or communion has been celebrated for over 2000 years in the church; however, the frequency of the practice varies greatly across churches. For example, the non-denominational church that I grew up in, celebrated communion every Sunday with consistency and the focal point of each service. (It was so routine I could quote what was going to be said.) Now, I am part of a church that celebrates communion once per month as a conclusion to the sermon. Another major difference between the two churches is who is welcome to participate in communion. For instance, my first church greatly expressed that only those who profess Christ could partake and must not receive communion in an unworthy. Evidently, the church’s view of Atonement (Penal Substitution) influenced a memorial view of communion. Also, the leader’s interpretation of 1 Corinthians 11:29 influenced this approach to communion. As our weekly reading pointed out, “Most who take the Memorial View do not have a place for grace in their theology beyond salvation” (Peterson 3). Therefore, during

Communion, or Eucharist, whereby Jesus is believed to award communion by way of himself *

Instead, it leans more toward the Zwinglian view, teaching Christians that the Supper is a memorial of Jesus’ death, burial, and resurrection (1 Cor. 11:26). Jesus Himself never suggested that the elements in the Supper contained His physical or spiritual presence, but that they were symbols of what rescued humankind from its sin (Luke 22:19-20). The idea that the elements represent anything beyond this is foreign to the Scriptures.

There are several different sacraments in Christianity; seven to be exact, but the two key Christian sacraments are Baptism and Eucharist. They both belong in Christianity, but not everyone practices these sacraments.

Christians have been celebrating the Lord’s Supper for almost two thousand years. In this paper I will refer to the Lord’s Supper as an ordinance of the church. “An ordinance is an outward rite prescribed by Christ to be performed by His Church.” There are quite a few varying interpretations among the different churches on how the Lord’s Supper is to be practiced. I Corinthians 11:23-34 provides Christians with the scriptural meaning and reasons for observing the Lord’s Supper, also known as communion. Many consider the Lord’s Supper of little or no value and some consider the ordinance as more of a ritual. In some modern churches, preaching the Word is emphasized the most and communion is only observed once a month or

To begin with, the definition of good is to be desired or approved of. The definition of evil is profoundly immoral and malevolent. Luke 6:45 explains the difference between the good and

Orthodox Churches view of Eucharist: strongly asserts the "Real Presence" of Jesus ' body in the Eucharist; by this the sacrament is not symbolic of the body and blood of Jesus but rather that it is his body and blood. The church reenacts the death of Jesus through this

Additionally, the Christians were accused of treason because they refused to worship or sacrifice to the emperor. Christians believed that the emperor was just a man, and that worship was only reserved for God. Many pagans felt this was very suspicious. The fact that Christians gathered together for church services and did not permit entry to non-Christians at these services did not help sway the suspicions held by pagans. In fact, it only fueled more speculation and rumors about the Christians. For instance, they were accused of being cannibals because of the misinterpretations of the Eucharist.

|* Eucharist - Presence |During the Eucharist, the Priest calls |The bread and wine, being symbols, |As in Orthodoxy, the Priest invokes the |

The Holy Eucharist is the most critical, consecrated, and urgent part of Catholic love, since it's viewed as the genuine, genuine, and generous body and blood, soul and godliness of Christ — under the appearances of bread and wine. Those appearances speak to and are seen by the feeling of taste.

Jesus told us that “This is My Body.” He didn’t tell us that it symbolized his body and blood, he said that it was. Theodore believes that Jesus wants us to look at the Eucharist as it sits, and as it is, not according to the nature of it. He says that if we sin, we can rely on the Body and Blood to strengthen us and help us to do good deeds. Also, when the offering is brought up to the altar, it is merely just bread, and water mixed with wine. It only turns into the real Body and Blood of Jesus when it is blessed by the

Receiving the Eucharist is one of the most important things we can do as a catholic. Holy Communion is the most important of all the sacraments. It completes the Sacraments of Initiation. The bread and wine we receive at communion is the body and blood of Jesus. It becomes the bread and body of Jesus through Transubstantiation. Transubstantiation is the conversion of the substance of the Eucharistic elements into the body and blood of Christ at consecration, only the appearances of bread and wine still remain. We participate in the sacrament of communion to commemorate all that Jesus did for us and getting nailed to a cross so we can be free from sin and have eternal life in heaven.

The Communion Christians have always regarded the Holy Communion as being one very important element towards achieving discipleship since the very beginning. However, the question in every Christian’s mind is “what are we doing?” it is, therefore, important to discuss what the holy communion means about theology. The Holy Communion has several names given to it. Among them are: the Eucharist, the Lord’s Supper, Divine Liturgy, and the Mass. Inside the New Testament, there are also varying details given there concerning what entails the Holy Communion on accounts given by Christ himself.[1] The Holy Communion does not compare to Baptism which is another sacrament that is non-repeatable. It is repeatable to some certain degrees as it can be done on a daily basis such as those performed by the Catholic Church. In other instances, it can be conducted on a much infrequent celebration such as the ones that happen in Reformed Churches. Referring to Baptism, there are differences in the practice and its significance, and sometimes the understanding of what it means to be baptized. This has gone ahead to become e a hindrance to churches having a common celebration, but at the same time, there is some spiritual benefit that accrues to the people that partake in it. In the same way, the Eucharist possess the same characteristics. Nature of the Union of Christ and Church The Holy Communion is not just a matter of people ingathering in unity. The purpose of having the communion is so