Examples Of A Constitutional Paradigm

There are many types of modern and historic governments. The form of government a nation has is influenced by their past government and the specific circumstances in the country. There are many variations of essentially similar forms of government. All forms of government can be simplified into a classification as either limited or unlimited.

The essay identifies an ethical dilemma in the United States Army Aviation Branch. It seeks to identify the root cause of the problem using the ethical lenses of rules, outcomes, and virtue provide by the Center for the Army Profession and Ethic. Modern Army Leaders face an ethical dilemma, specifically in low-density Military Occupational Specialties, of completing the mission and enforcing the standards of Army Regulation 600-9. Units deploying or conducting critical training need Soldiers or pilots holding crucial skills. These Soldiers must comply with the body composition standards outlined in the regulation. There are no exceptions. Concrete experience obtained through interviews provided examples of the dilemma. The concrete experiences also provided the leaders action when encountering an ethical dilemma. The root problem produced two courses of action. The courses of action entered the ethical lenses. The impact on the force and recommendation to correct the root cause were given. Leaders must build, implement, and enforce a rigourous Physical Readiness Training program. They must also monitor and participate in the program.

The U.S. Constitution provides power to the President and Congress to develop and enact national security policy (Ulrich, 1). As such our civilian leaders have the right and responsibility to maintain oversight of the military. Two civil-military relations theories, Normal and Clausewitzian, offer competing views. The Normal theory suggests officers are professionals and interference from civilian leaders is inappropriate (Cohen, 4). The Clausewitzian theory contends the statesman may inject himself in any aspect of military strategy since

Throughout the late 18th century a committee of 55 individuals were called for a Constitutional Convention in which the new nation of America was undergoing an afterbirth of a new system of government. The delegates were debating upon the the pre-existing Constitution as well as the Articles of Confederation due to the fact that the current way the nation was being governed was not sufficient to appease the people. To counter the Articles of Confederation as well as support the Constitution Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison anonymously wrote the Federalist papers consisting of 85 articles defending the document of the public. So how exactly

This chapter covers quite a bit of information on the Constitution, but how it begins is by first establishing what was in place before the Constitution was created. The historical background given in this chapter explains how the Articles of Confederation were first created in order that some type of union among the states could be agreed upon, so that they were no longer just individual states, but a nation. Unfortunately, the only type of governing the people chose to accept was a weak and essentially useless Congress, who could barely get anything done. This idea was only further proven when it was not Congress that managed to stop Shay’s Rebellion, but instead mercenaries who were hired by wealthy citizens. Due to this startling result

Supporters of gay marriage in the United States were a minority group for quite some time. (Green, 2015) The topic of homosexuality and same sex marriage is one that probes the primary question of whether or not same sex marriages are ones fundamental right under both the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. (Lempert, 2015) The case of Obergefell v. Hodges was a case that held that the Fourteenth Amendment requires all states to recognize and grant same sex marriage licenses to couples that have been granted that right in other jurisdictions. This case may be considered a significant decision of the United States

The Constitutional Convention took place May 25 to September 17, 1787 with George Washington presiding.

How did the United States Constitution come about? This short paper on the Federalist Papers will explain how the Constitutional Convention in 1787 used them to assist in the writing and subsequent ratification of the Constitution. The Federalist Papers were actually 85 letters written to newspapers in the later 1780’s to urge in the ratification of the Constitution. Ratification was needed by 9 of the 13 States.

Affirming the notion that the elected leader of the United States is privileged following inauguration the title of also being the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces, he or she retains the option to utilize the privilege if and when a situation of confounding merit is introduced. During times in which the safety of the national public-home or abroad- is threatened, I believe that the president is entitled, with clarified ramifications of course, to exercise his or her capacity of powers within the United States Armed Forces as a means of temporary resolution to matters regarding support immediate or imminent threat. Although on recent accounts the elicited power of utilizing force has come into conflict with constitutional stipulations

The Constitution Requirements Define the Articles of Confederation and why the Constitution was needed The agreement made by the original 13 states in 1777 establishing a confederacy to be know as the United Stated of America; replaced by the Constitution of 1788. There have some reasons to create this Constitution.

The theme of obedience to authority has even greater significance in the military environment. The issue has been explored in the recent popular cinema through films such as The General’s Daughter and more significantly in the 1999 court-room drama A Few Good Men. The film, starring Tom Cruise and Jack Nicholson, presents both sides of the need for absolute obedience versus the right of individual conscience in the military. The issue of following orders versus human rights in the military has been intelligently handled. The film does not treat the issue in a one-sided or black and white manner but gives both sides of the subject. (“A Few

Disinterest of the American people left the constitutional structure of military leadership unrefined by further enactment (Huntington 8). The Founding Fathers built the United States on a system of checks and balances to protect the people against one entity having too much power, after all the saying goes “absolute power corrupts absolutely”. Although ingrained into the core lifestyle of the American populace, it would be a mistake to take this protection for granted. A lack of supervision coupled with growing distaste and distance from the civilian sector could result in a military that has an enormous amount of power over foreign war strategy. Despite the disagreement of many American, the United States continues to play a major role in world interests and activities (Mackenzie). Lack of civilian political leader control is a danger to democracy (Weber 101). That is not to say if left unchecked the civil-military divide will warp into a strong military state, rather that the military has a more immediate impact on foreign relation and represents the United States in many countries around the world. Controlled primarily by immediate military supervisors, the nation depends on them to dutifully obey orders given thousands of miles

It is important that leaders exhibit traits that will not hinder our military’s ability to combat irregular threats on the battlefield. Battlefields of today do not consist of two or more armies massing their forces against one another in an attempt to destroy the opposition. In today’s battlefield, leaders must exhibit three prominent leadership traits: judgement, integrity, and knowledge to combat irregular threats. Incidents in past conflicts such as the Abu Ghraib incident in Iraq and the My Lai massacre in Vietnam; have shown a lack of leaders judgement, integrity, and knowledge and have led to an increased insurgency against allied forces.

The Laws of War and Rules of Engagement exist on the battlefield in order to set rules in place for combatants in an armed conflict so that there is less negative impact on non-combatants. This is accomplished by establishing Laws of War and strictly adhering to them, even if the enemy does not. By following the established Laws of War we can minimize the negative outcomes on innocent people as well as attempt to keep ourselves in a positive view with society at large. Without strong leadership it is easy for a force to lose focus and discipline in the harsh conditions of combat. We need look no further than the incident that occurred in 2005 with the Army's 101st Airborne Division in Iraq, detailed in the book

As Captains, officers will be given the opportunity to become company commanders. Command holds the highest level of responsibility of any duty position in the Army. Commanders are responsible for millions of dollars of equipment, dozens of lives, and the application of lethal force. This responsibility is what makes military expertise vitally important to Captains in the United States Army. Additionally, the responsibilities of Command, if carried out improperly have the ability to cause significant harm to civil-military relations in this country. Gregory D. Foster identifies several shortcomings of the civil-military relationship in the rant he published in 2007. Though he offers no solutions to the