Examples Of A Moral Theory

For many political theorists and thinkers, the ideas of labor and property are central to the evolution of governments or states, and henceforth, very important aspects of human life. For some writers, the development of property is a direct result of labor, and government is set up to ensure the property rights of those who own property. Some view property and labor fundamentally or naturally connected aspects of human life, while others see it as merely a social convention. Each thinker also has different opinions about how property is acquired, as well as what the limits to property acquisition are. While one writer may provide the most fair account of property, another may provide a more feasible account of property acquisition and

Property has always played an important role in the life of an individual, community and country. The practical significance of the property lies in the fact that it enables us at least the necessities and amenities of the routine life if not the means of comfort. The property rights give the successor a way to overcome the sufferings and to fight the battle of their lives.

Real property rights do in fact serve two valuable goals. First, they prevent rivalrous uses by multiple claimants to a particular piece of property and therefore avoid the tragedy of the commons. Second they allow their owners to invest in improving or developing the property (Lemley, 2005).

Natural rights are not given to any man by the government every man is born with them. The right to own property is one of the natural rights that John Locke thought of during the enlightenment era. John Locke said that the reason that people should be able to own property is because everyone owns property in themselves so therefore people should have the rights to land. John Locke also says that more than land or property can be sold or given away, also the goods from the land can be sold or bought. This way of property rights was in effect in the U.S until 1926 when there was no just “taking” land any more, if land was taken it could only be used for public works.(John) Now since 1926 people have had to pay for the land that they want, but the value of land went down because there could only be one house per two or more acres instead of the only being one house per acre.(Powell) Liberty is a natural right that John Locke believed that people could govern themselves, John also did not see the need for a government, he said the only reason for a government is to protect the natural rights such as liberty. John believed that with liberty everyone is free to do what they please and that everyone should make mistakes as long as them mistakes are not affecting the liberty of other people. Currently in the U.S this right is similar

From this brief survey of global perspectives of land use, from the North American Arctic to southern India, it is apparent that human societies conceptualize property rights in a diversity of ways. These examples provide evidence that humans are fully capable of living well and sustainably under a variety of ownership models, including communitarianism.

The chapter five of The Broadview anthology of social and political thought: Essential readings deals with John Locke beliefs over property. The following paper summarizes his key ideas and discusses them as well as applying them to today’s society. The chapter starts with Locke referring to the Bible which stats that God gave the earth to Adam and his heirs. This insinuates that property is only reserved for the monarchy. Locke disagrees and spends the following chapter arguing that property is for humanity as a whole.

In Intro to Ethics, we have discussed each moral theory in the context of how the theories dealt with the theory of right conduct and with the deontic status the action had. When we looked at how each theory we talked about dealt with deontic status, we looked at how the actions were right or wrong. The main theories we looked at this semester that dealt with right conduct were utilitarianism, Kant’s moral theory, and virtue ethics. Although each of these moral theories has its own flaws, I believe that Kant’s moral theory is the strongest and most superior out of all the moral theories.

Property is a vague term people use to distinguish what belongs to them and what belongs to others. There is no easy answer to how people come to have ownership, but people do believe they are owed property. There are two different types of property to be evaluated: private and public. The benefits and harms of these types of property and their roles in a society have been widely debated. John Locke and Karl Marx have, what appear to be, vastly different stances on these debates. John Locke believes the government has the obligation to protect individual, private property and Karl Marx is a strong supporter of the government ensuring public property in order to eliminate the class system, but both would agree on what constitutes property and

As can be seen in the essay My Wood by E.M. Forster, owning property “makes [him] feel heavy” and causes him to be “annoyed” with others who might trespass onto his property. Forster continues by comparing himself to his neighbors and friends who have more property and says,

The topic I have decided to explore from this week's reading is the assertion that private property rights are a barrier to economic growth. I agree that having a well documented and enforceable system is necessary in protecting one's personal property rights, however the reading seems to believe that landowners are disadvantaged because they cannot secure loans against their property. In the reading, it is reported that Egypt has $240 billion dollars tied up in what he refers to as "dead capital". (De Soto, 2000).

Since the rational man sees property as something for the right holder to posses and accumulate for himself and not for the community to exploit, he creates laws that preserve his own possessions and deceives/forces others to help utilize their property. Locke argues cultivation is a positive good and hoarding does not lie “in the largeness of his possession, but the perishing of any thing uselessly in it” (Locke 46). He also states accumulation of property doesn’t injure others and money increases ability to accumulate (Locke 30-50). Although it may not harm the property owners to accumulate, it does affect the rest of the community that are at the hands of working for these property owners. While the rich owners are cultivating resources for themselves, they are constantly taking away from the community, leaving the rest of society in a vulnerable position. This leaves a lack of opportunity for others to accumulate for survival and infringes on basic human natural rights. It will eventually come to a time where the rich property owners have everything they need to survive while the rest of society perishes due to the deficiency of available

In James Rachels’ book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, he expresses ideas within the concluding chapter, “What Would a Satisfactory Moral Theory be like?” that lay an silhouette of every moral approach we have discussed so far and compounding it into a final discussion with a couple of final contentions towards a comprehensive understanding of morality and the approaches we can make as moral guides to make decisions that are virtuous for each class without exception. Rachels’ gives thoughtful perspective on all subjects that we have learned about and makes final accumulations for the way we can decide to use these for our own benefit. While then expressing the virtues we must value for ourselves to have a best plan, and the ways our choices can help others in a positive aspect.

Moral theories can help justify the decisions that are made. Each theory has separate viewpoints in which other theories borrow elements from. Moral theories attempt to explain what it is that makes some actions right and others wrong. These are then used as a guide to making choices. They operate at a more general level than moral or legal principles and rules. The four main groups that one should be aware of are: Utilitarian, Kantian, Aristotelian and Feminist.

Some flies were flying when they saw a jar of honey. They placed their feet in it, and they ate greedily. Their feet, however, became so smeared with the honey that they could not fly nor release themselves, and they were suffocated. Just as the flies were expiring, they exclaimed, "O foolish creatures that we are, for the sake of a little pleasure we have destroyed ourselves." Like these little flies, our human hearts perish in prisons of the vice that dominates us. Property ownership can be a vice, and also an excellent example that we are weak most of the time. Is property good or bad? This question has made me think a lot. In doing so I have come to the belief that property is not good or bad itself. In fact,

Ms Ngema:they are the same its just that most of the rules from ethics are made up of the society whereas the morals most of them are your decisions and choices you are not told to or forced to comply with them whereas ethics are certain that you are to follow them which is why we find the code of ethics at work place ,churches etc