preview

Examples Of Blindness In King Lear

Decent Essays

King Lear Essay According to the dictionary, blindness is defined as, "Unable to see; Lacking the sense of sight; sightless", but in King Lear, by William Shakespeare, that is far from the definition of blindness. In King Lear, blindness is not just being physically incapable of seeing, but it is more being morally blind, being blind to the truth. This kind of blindness is demonstrated mainly in King Lear, the Duke of Albany, and the Earl of Gloucester. They can all physically see, but they all are morally blind to the truth, and it ultimately leads them to their downfall. To begin with, King Lear can physically see just fine, but right from the get go, King Lear is morally blind. His thinks so highly of himself, that he lacks the ability …show more content…

Lear was so blinded, that he did not see that he was getting rid of the one counsellor that was actually loyal to him, showing how blind he is to the truth. He ended up getting rid of the one daughter that actually loved him and the one counsellor that was actually loyal to him. His moral blindness ended up costing him his life, and he had to endure a tremendous amount of suffering as well, because of it. Secondly, the Duke of Albany is also blind to the truth, he is married to Goneril, but he does not see her for what she truly is. This is clearly evident when he says, "O Goneril! / You are not worth the dust which the rude wind / Blows in your face" (4.2.29-31). At this point the Duke of Albany finally realizes that Goneril is truly evil and now that he sees the truth, he is free from her evil ways. He no longer supports her but rather supports King Lear. He shows his moral blindness towards the Earl of Gloucester's incident when he says, "Where was his son when they did take his eyes?" (4.2.88). He thinks that Edmund was loyal to Gloucester when he was not, this shows that he was also morally blind to the fact. He could not see the truth that ended up costing Gloucester his eyes. His moral blindness did not end up costing him anything, but he realized how wrong he had been when he was supporting …show more content…

During the play, Edmund keeps Gloucester in the dark by saying Edgar wants to kill him to inherit his wealth. Gloucester only realizes that he was morally blind when Regan tells him that Edmund deceived him, "All dark and comfortless, Where's my son Edmund?" (3.7.82), after that Regan replies, "Out, treacherous villan! Thou call'st on him that hates thee; it was he That made the overture of thy treasons to

Get Access