Examples Of Discomfort's Trigger Happens When Someone Experiences An Ambiguous Social Situation

Asch got 123 student volunteers to participate in wat they thought was a vision test but was actually an experiment on conformity. All but one of the participants in each group was really a confederate and the real purpose of the experiment was to see how the acual participant would react to the behaviour of the confederates.

Box 3.2: Why do it this way? is especially relevant, as it considers an important advantage of the experimental method. Chapter 6: No experiments are discussed in this chapter, however, the essay question requires you to discuss the value of experiments. Consider if there are certain aspects of human behaviour and/or performance that cannot be meaningfully investigated using experiments. What are the alternative methods of studying behaviour? Sections 2 and 3 of Chapter 6 are relevant in this respect.

unknowing that they would undoubtedly be the teacher in the experiment. They were assigned to

2. A. The research was conducted by first paying his participants $4.50 ($30 today) to come in and take part in the experiment. The group of participants he selected was composed of 40 males between 20 and 50 who were told that the experiment was to test the effect of “punishment on learning“. There was 15 skilled-unskilled workers, 16 white-collar employees, and 9 professionals. Apart from them, there were 2 key participants, a confederate, who was actually a 47 year-old accountant and an actor who dressed as the experimenter. He decided to test the power of obedience in a laboratory which was clever on Milgram’s part. He designed a realistic looking fake scenario, complete with a shock chair and men dressed in lab coats. The most realistic component was the fake shock generator that actually quite scary-looking. It had levels of shock that went up from 30 to 450 volts and the levels were labeled to describe the intensity of the shock. The participants

In the experiment, people were picked randomly and one as a teacher and one as the student. They were told to take a quiz and give electric shocks of increasing intensity as punishment if the student can’t answer. During the experiment, many people were concerned as someone can be heard shouting but only a few people who decided to stop and stick to their morals. But the others kept on going because they were just following orders from a superior (Milgram 77). "The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Philip Zimbardo, is about an experiment that was made to understand the roles people play in prison situations. For the experiment, Zimbardo converted a basement of the Stanford University psychology building into a mock prison. The participants were told to act as prisoners and guards. It was planned to be a two-week experiment but was forced to shut down in 6 days, all because of people quickly getting into their roles and started acting like the real prisoners and guards (Zimbardo 104). To compare both experiments, although they differed vastly in design and methodology, the point of both experiments was to observe how far an individual would go in inflicting increasing pain on a victim. Also how people obey under authoritative circumstances, when given power or different roles, however the writers differ in the seriousness of the fight for individuality and the use of reality.

The participants seated themselves around a table, these confederates were not known to each other, and most important concept of this experiment relied on the fact all of the participants were working together, but for one. They took turns in a fixed order to call out publicly which of three comparison lines was the same length as a standard line on the left card. In reality only one person was a naive participant who answered second to last, the rest were experimental confederates instructed to give erroneous responses.

In such experiment, “ Elliott would cite phony scientific research claiming that one group was superior to the other. Throughout the day, the group would be treated as such. Elliott learned that it only took a day for the “superior” group to turn crueler and the “inferior” group to become more insecure.” (Danko) She would switch which group was the “superior” group so that all the students felt the prejudices.

Justification: James instructed college students for an experiment. Half had to express anger and the other happiness. Their result on how the actually changed to wait they showed. 3.

where there would be a teacher and a subject on two opposing sides of a wall. Whenever the subject made an incorrect answer, they would receive a shock, this experiment was rigged so that the subject would actually be shocked be rather made extremely convincing screams of pain and the subject was told to give the wrong answer to the teacher. When the voltage reached passed 200 v, the teacher would become more reluctant to go further with the experiment due to the pain that the subject was going through, but the teacher didn’t know that the test was rigged. After it got past 475 V, about 65% of the teachers would hold the switch to shock the subject under the pressure from the men in the white coats recording the experiment and in most cases were reluctant to press on the button by themselves. This experiment no only proves that many people will do dangerous and immoral things under the pressure of authority, but also supports the idea that many people would not commit these acts underneath their own free will due to human

Participants: When testing the before mentioned hypothesis, the participants will be the people of a local bar. We will randomly recruit 50 participants for this research with the details listed below in summary. A local get together family reunion will be used to select participants at random. The participants will be pulled from the local populous that come to the bar on a Saturday night. The researchers will keep an even amount of men and women when selecting participants. Once selected the participants will be assigned to a group using a die. If the die lands on an even number the participant will be assigned to the experimental group, likewise if the die lands on

They were informed and ready to answer questions from the class. However, they did realize that they have missed a control group until they were faced with that question. Like any good scientist, they modified their experiment and admitted that the results would be stronger of they added that one control group.

They will be asked to “hang-out” with one another, including confederates, as they would any ordinary day. The experimental group will also be asked to come into lab where they will be stripped of all personal belongings and put into grey uniforms, such as the ones inmates in jail wear. From there the students in the experimental group will be ridiculed and harassed by confederates for two hours based on their physical attractiveness, athletic ability, and intelligence levels while being given the same gender neutral brain games, sports recreation areas, and unlimited healthy and junk food. This procedure will be repeated three times within a two week period. After each of the sessions the amount of healthy and junk food will be

The participating students were observed for a period of two days. It took place during reading class. The observation had to be during the beginning of class until

‘The approach is designed to help in the resolution of difficulties that people experience in interacting with their social situations, where internal feelings of discomfort are associated with events in the external world’.

He had the experimenter come in dressed in a lab coat and explained that they were to ask a series of word associations to the learner and administer shocks for incorrect answers. As the number of incorrect answers increased so did the intensity of the shocks given. Voltage of the shocks ranged from 15/ slight shock to 300/danger to 450/xxx. The shocks were a form of punishment. The naïve subject was unaware that the shocks dispensed were simulated.