Examples Of Ethos In A More Perfect Union

There is not one rhetorical strategy used in this speech as ethos, pathos, and logos are all seen. Obama appeals to emotion well, reaching people affected by racial issues. Obama successfully uses allusion and repetition, along with personal anecdotes to relate to the audience. Ethos is a rhetorical strategy used

Another way Clinton uses pathos is when he tries to comfort the people who have lost loved ones by saying, “You have lost too much, but you have not lost everything.” Clinton lets the audience know that they have people that will help them through this hard time and they have the nation behind them: “You have certainly not lost America, for we will stand with you for as many tomorrows as it takes.” Clinton ultimately reaches his goal of comforting his audience by using ethos and pathos strategies throughout his speech.

In Obama’s speech “A More Perfect Union”, he emphasizes the importance of unity among Americans. He wants people to overlook their ethnic backgrounds and join together as one. This speech brought out many points that Americans should take into consideration. That even though we are all from different backgrounds, we should overlook our differences to make us a stronger nation. Obama’s speech was inspiring in some aspects, but in a way his speech also is controversial.

Clinton uses ethos in her speech to persuade her audience by showing them your credibility. Ethos is an effective way to persuade an audience. This helps to show the audience that the speaker knows what they’re talking about. As First Lady and Senator, Clinton shows she has credibility on the topic by saying “Over the past 25 years, I have worked persistently on issues relating to women, children, and families. Over the past two and a half years. I’ve has the opportunity to learn more about the challenges facing women in my own country and around the world” (Clinton 2).

Pathos, which is a term used to describe when a speaker uses stories, quotes, or vivid language to pursue the audience to do something. A great example of when Michelle Obama uses pathos is when she says, “Many of you probably grew up like I did – in a community that wasn’t rich, not even middle class, but where people knew

The strongest of Obama’s points reside in his use of pathos, or emotional appeal, to connect with his audience. The audience and appeal are blatant from the beginning of the essay to the final word. Americans. Due to the loss of American lives, the emotional charge within the audience is almost palpable. Obama highlights this when he states:

President Obama frequently used pathos as his tactic in persuading the audience that this is an act they should support. Near the beginning of his speech, he tells a heart

Ethos is an appeal to ethics in writing to convince the audience of the speaker’s character. In the start of the speech, King tells about a hypothetical journey through the ages of time. He mentions the Great Depression and uses the famous words, “We have nothing to fear but fear itself.” a paraphrased line from John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address. The use of JFK’s words gives credibility to King by mentioning and remembering a popular past President. Another example of King’s use of ethos is in this quote, “Somewhere I read of the freedom of assembly. Somewhere I read of freedom of speech. Somewhere I read of the freedom of press. Somewhere I read that the greatness of America is the right to protest for right.” Martin Luther King Jr. says this because these are all amendments in the Constitution that were not being applied to African Americans even though these are

Ethos addresses the character of the speaker. Their reputation, credibility, honesty, and authority. What is the speaker recognized for? Does the speaker appear professional, do they behave in a professional manner? Are the speaker’s intentions clear, do they demonstrate concern for their audience? Does the speaker speak with confidence, is their message succinct?

In Bush’s speech, he uses pathos. Pathos is the use of emotional strategies. It’s important that Bush used pathos because it helps draw the receiver in by expressing emotions like anger towards the terrorists and sadness towards the nation. Bush expresses anger by saying “We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.”

He says, ““I don’t have to tell you how many are still denied their basic rights… who must live a lie to keep their jobs, or who are afraid to walk the street, or down the hall at school” and this is when he starts building the emotional connection with his audience. This is when first his audience see pathos, but at the same time he is encouraging them to fight for the gays rights and to give them a better treatment. Obama said. “I said I would never counsel patience; that it wasn’t right to tell you… that it was right to tell African Americans to be patient in the fight for equal rights a half century ago” in other words he is using the pathos appeals to support his opinion and let people know or to rethink how fighting in a civic movement would be significant later. The way Obama express himself to support his claims are extremely under the rhetorical appeals ethos and pathos by providing the explanation of actions that back then were not a completely success but that now have a significant impact into the community.

Ethos is convincing the audience of the author’s credibility. King uses ethos within his speech by establishing credibility in his self. He starts his speech by bringing up The Emancipation Proclamation. The Emancipation Proclamation is a document issued by

The rhetorical appeals that were set forth in this speech were mainly, logos (logical thinking), ethos (ethics and moral connections) and pathos (focus on sadness and tragedy). First off, logos were all about logical thinking and the only logical thinking is that there are problems in American, major problems, that need to be addressed in order for us to live in harmony with each other in this nation. Ethos is the ethics and morals of the American people that if we fix the root of the problem, which Obama sees it as a one nation type problem, but in all reality that it’s not just one rooted problem, it branches upon branches of problems that stemmed from our racial background as immigrants to North America. Obama displays pathos situations a lot in this article he produced. Pathos comes down to playing on the heart strings of America to try and relate that our

He goes into depth about the things we can do that will get our country nowhere and will only cause us more harm and then he turns around to elaborate on the things that will make a difference and will help our nation such as addressing education problems for all races. In his explanation on the negative choices we can make, Obama mentions the OJ Simpson trial and the tragedy of hurricane Katrina. Through the mention of these two historic events it brings in a sense of emotion. In regards to the OJ trial some may feel angry, sad, maybe a little confused, or possibly even nothing, but as far as hurricane Katrina most would feel much sorrow and sympathy. When a speaker emotionally effects an audience with words its most likely because he or she used pathos which is very effective because it can cause a better or worse reaction from one’s audience and may also sway a group of people to agree or disagree with the speaker’s argument. In Obama’s speech, he uses pathos to appeal to citizen’s in a more personal way by giving them something to feel by alluding to something they can relate to. Obama gave his speech on race equality which would only make sense to have a theme about race, throughout the entire

Firstly, Both Obama and Chavez use ethos to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of their argument. For example, in Obama's speech, paragraph 28 states, “I would not be running for president if I didn't believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country.” This piece of text appeals to how the audience trusts what Obama is saying because he uses the hope of what America wants and what he wants, to better shape himself as an authoritative and trustworthy figure. In Chavez’s is text it says, paragraph 19, “ Ask the family of Rene Lopez, the young farm worker from Fresno who was shot to death last year because he supported the union.” Chavez used this to intensify the seriousness of how the farm working union gets shut down when all they want is equality, by using an actual group of people who are affected by it. Both Obama and