Examples Of Ethos Pathos Logos

To understand King’s views on nonviolent protest, I will start by summarizing some of the main points in his “Letter from Birmingham jail”. In spite of the fact that the "Letter” is verifiably worried with justice all through, King likewise addresses the question specifically at a few focuses. In actuality, he places that justice maintains the poise of the human soul, while injustice conflicts with it. By talking about this idea by and large, he builds up criteria by which to obscurely assault both segregation and silence it. He at last suggests that the man who sees injustice and does nothing to stop it is acting unjustly also. Taking after this thought, he contends that laws must be permeated with an ethical sense so as to be just; as such, law and morality can not be viewed as independent interests or areas. The best way to really enact change and help humankind rise above its confinements is to act with as well as grasp “extremism”. According to Mott, “That this action had been termed “extreme” King admits “initially disappointed” him.” But King decides that if loyalty to good principles

King uses irony, by giving examples of him using peaceful actions that were condemned anyway because they were said to ?precipitate violence?. He went on to say, ?Isn?t that like condemning a robbed man because his possession of money precipitated in the evil act of robbery??(King 563). Dr. King also realizes that the white moderates are mostly religious. He reminds them ?Human progress never rolls in on wheels of inevitability, it comes through tireless efforts of men willing to be co-workers with God??(King 563). Again, he urges the audience to get up and become active, and that there will be no change without their action.

King articulates that his nonviolent protest look “to create such a crisis and foster such a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue.” King is agreeing with the clergymen but show that the community declines to listen and that nonviolent protest make a massive impact, the clergymen can see how his actions are only option.

King also uses quotes from the Bible to further involve the emotional attachment of the people with the Bible. He compares himself with Apostle Paul when he says that he is going to carry the gospel of freedom to the places beyond his native town. This served two purposes. On one hand, he could reach out to the illiterate people who knew of Paul through churches, and on the other hand, he made it clear that he was undertaking a big mission. So, the whites were expected to come to support him in the name of god. Besides using the name of god to appeal to the people, King presents the real scenario of the life of the African American people to arouse sympathy

King told a story about a bus protest he attended in Alabama. He thought that he would have had support from the white church, but sadly he did not. The ministers, priests, and rabbis refused to “understand the freedom movement and misrepresenting its leaders; all too many others have been more cautious than courageous and have remained silent behind the anesthetizing security of stained glass windows.” He hope that when he came to Birmingham, the white church would see the justice in King’s actions and serve “as the channel through which our just grievances could reach the power

King’s ideas regarding civil rights and injustice are valued by most people, and this essay demonstrates how articulate and meaningful his words truly are. Although opposite views can be noted, based on the logistical aspects of struggle, the rational, ethical, and emotional views that King expressed can not accurately be refuted. This essay precisely expresses the importance of fighting for justice, and the correct manner in which to do

To begin with, we must use nonviolence to achieve freedom based on the article "Letter from Birmingham Jail" King argued "my friend I must say to you that we have not me a civil right without determine a nonviolent pressure" this demonstrates that king wants to achieve freedom in a nonviolent manner. In addition King states "actually we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is

In his letter to the clergy he justified the use of ‘nonviolent direct action’ as tactical means to bringing parties together to negotiate. He vehemently condemned all forms of violent action but insisted that it was strategic and constructive to employ the nonviolent tension as a powerful alternate to negotiation. Similarly, Dr. King Jr. stressed to his audience in his momentous speech in Washington DC, that the desire to attain set goal must not be tainted by any acts of retaliation and cautioned the crowd to avoid the temptation of being ‘guilty of wrong doing”. He emphasized the importance of adhering to strict discipline and conducting their struggle in the highest form of respect for human dignity.

King did not hesitate to declare his distaste for a certain group by stating “the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice” (80). In this statement, King was acknowledging the way many whites who claimed they were in the movement to assist, were really there to shut the noise up and avoid conflict. In so many words King stated, he could not sit idly and allow injustice to be swept under the rug by these so-called peacemakers, and believed the white moderate was hurting more than helping the forwarding of the movement. King was also frustrated with people within the group he so lovingly was fighting for. King spoke about having two upsets when it came to African Americans. “One is a force of complacency… The other force is one of bitterness and hatred, and it comes perilously closed on advocating violence” (81). These statements were used to point out that some blacks were accepting the fate placed on them by the superior whites to be impoverished and denied rights while others were so furious with the system in its current state they were willing to go further than the peaceful protests currently held and take justice into their own hands through violence, King was hurt by the current state of his people and felt something needed to

Expressing disappointment towards the church leaders, he states that they should do more, to help the minority stand on their two feet, and not feel discriminated against. This is because following the teachings of God, every human being is equal. Therefore, the church must help structure society closest to how The Bible shows. King fought for this same equality. However, being verbally reprimanded and going to jail for voicing his rights, he shows what happens when you go against the norm of society. The church is there to break those norms, and construct new ideals in accordance with the word of God.

King disagreed with acquiescing and violence but agrees with the oppressed that non-violent resistance is a way to achieving freedom. Peacefully protesting can bring better change than violence. King wrote, “The principle of non-violent resistance seeks to reconcile the truths of two opposites – the acquiescence and violence- while avoiding the extremes and immoralities of both”. The use of non-violent resistance not only brings greater change, but also corresponds somewhat with acquiescence and violence. A non-violent resister would favor a person who acquiesces by agreeing that physical aggression is an immoral thing to do.

African American were fighting for their freedom in the Jim Crow South, to be treated as equals. But because of these laws, blacks could be arrested for even the smallest misdemeanor and be barred from voting. Luckily Dr. King discovered that nonviolence was the best weapon he had in his arsenal. King’s best example for the importance of peaceful resistance can be found in his open letter, known as the “Letter from Birmingham Jail”. It says that people have a moral responsibility to break unjust laws and to take action against them rather than wait for justice to come through the courts.

King refuses to believe that anything, even that injustice from white supremacists and police brutality could halt their cause. King carried this mentality with him wherever he went and protested his beliefs. This positive force is exactly what the suffering citizens of racial injustice needed to push

and Carson Clayborne information that can be used when researching King’s nonviolent protests. Three main supporting details that can be used in the research of King’s nonviolent protesting is the theology behind nonviolence, the demand for social change, the success of nonviolent protesting in Montgomery, Alabama. The theology behind nonviolence is described by King as the combination of Gandhism and Christianity (qtd in King 89). Gandhi’s teaching of nonviolence is an important factor when researching King’s nonviolent tactics because it was Gandhi’s theology that inspired King for all of his campaign trials and tribulations. King relied on the six principals of nonviolence to be the strength he needed to not abandon his journey for social and economic justice (qtd in King 95). The six principals allowed King to keep his religion strong mentally and physically and also understand that justice will come as long as he continues to fight for equality. In continuance, King and Clayborne also provide the success of nonviolence movement in Montgomery. King being able to make officials aware of social problems is important when researching nonviolence because it proved that nonviolence protesting can grasp the attention of local and United State Federal Government and possibly create social and economic change. Lastly, the proposal for social change is also an important factor in researching nonviolent protesting led by King because it

He states, “We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence.”[“I Have a Dream” speech.] This idea is important because King was dedicated to nonviolence due to drawing inspiration from both his Christian faith and the peaceful teachings of Mahatma Gandhi when leading the civil right movement.[TheKingCenter.org.] He believed physical force should not be met with violence but with “soul force”[I Have a Dream speech.] The commitment to to nonviolence was one of the main components that made the civil rights movement successful. This shows how this idea was most one of the most important in King’s