Examples Of Functional Equivalence Theory

To be clear, the intent of this essay is not to argue for or against the content; instead, we are analyzing what the article does in terms of the following:

In the interpretation from the ST to the TT there is fluctuating level of exoticism and calque and also social transplantation. A case of this is in the main passage where the TT utilized "God", yet then in the following sentence utilizes "Allah". Allah is not an English word, but rather a social transplantation from Arabic. Another illustration is the point at which they gave more setting to "Ya Allah" however including the clarification of "getting out woefully". This give the peruse of the TT a clarification with regards to the activity being minded out in the ST. The intentions in minding out a different type of interpreting is so that the ST TT still can have a similar impact. That way the peruse of the TT who could conceivably have a social comprehension of the first ST have a superior comprehension of the activity, which means, or profundity of the content in its unique stature. In interpretation of writings a primary part is to decipher not recently each word, but rather the foundation of each word in a way that significance has not been lost

As a continuing effort to improve quality of his assumptions, we could revisit and review his assumptions with the following generic questions:

Theory of translation: One puts primary emphasis on formal or on functional equivalency bridging into modern language.

vii. Does the article fit into an existing theoretical framework? In other words, what theory (ies) does the article address that was discussed

In conclusion, the author opposes every idea mentioned in the article. This proves that his negative attitude could affect the way the reader views his points. White’s explanation of the pros and cons contradict his opinions shown in the article. In regard to the author presenting this article with facts, he failed to support them with any credibility. Thus, his assumptions are weak which make his claim unreliable.

The book presented multiple terms and theories that I could beacon to. The four that presented me with the biggest ideological standpoints are: The Mildred Paradox, The Mildred Corollary, The Vending Machine Model, and The Tectonic Plates. All of these sparked an interest with me and helped me shaped my own opinion on this book and the ideas presented by it.

My rebuttal of Leveille and Mizner’s argument centers on the ideas behind premise 4 and how they lead

This has been a fast and interesting 8 weeks. For your Final Exam, I want you to reflect on the topics we had discussed during the last 7 weeks. Your responses below should only reflect your thoughts, understanding, and critical thinking. Your responses to each question can be at least 2-3 well-written paragraphs.

In the following paper I intend to compare and contrast the three major philosophical viewpoints regarding this question, and come to a

Validity- This article in comparison to other sources is harder to understand and contains minimal information about the theory compared to previous sources. There is factual information stated throughout the article but gaining a clear understanding comes with greater difficulty than it did with the other articles. It makes poorer points on the systems as it does not explore them in as much depth as other sources did.

When so many limitations of the functionalist theory are put forward it is difficult for one to submit to this theory as one of universal application. The conception of consensual norms and values presents one of the major limitations of the functionalist theory. By accepting the status quo in terms of core values, functionalist theories fail to explain how structural inequality contributes to deviance .

Walter Benjamin’s essay, The Task of the Translator, is illuminating in the way in which it shatters any preconceived ideas that may view the act of translation as diminishing the value of the original. Benjamin has high regard for translation, placing it in the realm of art as a distinct form. He argues that art is not about the audience or the receiver that is, it is not primarily about communication. The purpose of art is not to instil a specific belief, impart information or to entertain certain sentiments in the reader thus, appreciation does not reside in generating a moral by interpreting its content. As an art form, translation for Benjamin is not about propagating ideas or beliefs but is about embarking on the task of attaining pure

It is important that we understand and preserve the many different languages the Bible is translated into because they are disappearing at an alarming rate. Through these translations we may find a deeper meaning and understanding. Jost Zetzsche stated it best when he said, “I believe that translations of Scripture are not secondary fill-ins but as integral part of the ongoing and primary expression of God’s message in written form.”

Skopos thory is a functional theory belongs to a functionalist and communicative approach to translation theory, that appeared in Germany in 1970s .Translation studies were concentrated on equivalence concept which was the core idea of linguistic approach that had dominated for many years. The functional translation theory of Germany represents a big move away from the linguistic school of translation studies.