Examples Of Intertextuality In The Da Vinci Code

In the article “Intertextuality and the Discourse Community” James Porter points out to the audience that there is no original piece or writing. Porter’s article addresses the concept of plagiarizing. He does not oppose that plagiarizing is wrong, rather he claims that it is inevitable. Porter argues that in all pieces of writing are intertexual. Intertexuality is the idea that all writings have traces and ideas from other past text. Intertextuality is important to completely understand a piece of writing.

Intertextuality is everywhere. Many texts, whether as a book or a movie, has a “connection” with each other. During class, we discussed many times on how one book relates to another. But what does all this work done in class have to do with anything in life or one’s future? A person may not know it, but the truth is, all these efforts are extremely helpful in one’s life. If they can make compare texts and see their association with one another, then he or she can make lots more assumptions on other various writings. This can be helpful if the person wants to understand the compositions that they are reading. As I was reading, I noticed that the writings shared a lot of the same perspectives and themes. These include the topics of vampirism,

According to Doug Downs and Elizabeth Wardle, the authors of Writing about Writing: A College Reader, intertextuality is “the idea that all texts contain ‘traces’ of other texts and that there can be no text that does not draw on some ideas from some other texts” (395). When breaking down this definition, it is understandable why certain scholars of writing have concluded originality and individuality no longer exist. If all writers do is draw on the ideas of other writers, this would call the concept of originality into question. Furthermore, James E. Porter, the author of the essay “Intertextuality and the Discourse Community,” describes how intertextual examination reveals “the bits and pieces of Text which writers or speakers borrow or sew together to create new discourse” (397). In this way, Porter broadly paints intertextuality as smaller, individual texts belonging to larger, collective texts wherein all modes of authorship depend on the borrowing of texts from other sources. From this, one may naturally reach the conclusion that intertextuality forbids originality and individuality, considering that writers and speakers are simply literary tailors altering and sewing together bits of other texts. While it is true all texts contain allusions to other texts, the assumption that this puts limits on the individuality and originality of writers is fallacious because there is not a single being in the universe that has the exact same perspective as

By connecting, considering and concluding the response gained from literary works, the reader can obtain a deeper, analytical understanding of these techniques and tools used by the authors of the various literature forms. For this assignment, I have chosen to compare and contrast two separate literary works from “Journey into Literature” (Clugston, 2010), with similar themes. . The poems I will discuss are “The

Knowledge is a powerful thing. Additionally, knowledge can give a person an advantage in many aspects of life. Knowledge can help an individual get a job, it can help one get ahead in a class and it can help an individual understand what happens around them and why. Moreover, the wiser one is the more successful they can be. In the excerpt from the novel Under the Feet of Jesus, Helena Maria Viramontes describes how and why Estrella began to read and what provoked this change in her development. In order to convey Estrella’s development, Viramontes uses literary devices such as selection of detail, figurative language and tone to describe Estrella’s development from being puzzled and vitriolic to being educated and astute.

In chapter five, “When in Doubt, It’s from Shakespeare” talks about the reappearance of different well known figures in literature. Foster follows this by giving an idea that literature is made based on other literary stories. He states that one of the reasons why story borrowing occurs is because there is only one story and it’s the human experience. Book critics usually refer to the literary works and texts as ‘intertextually’. According to the author, intertextuality is sometimes used to challenge a reader. If the person reading the story can point out the similarities or repetitiveness in the text then the meaning will easily be revealed to them. In conclusion, being able to identify different meaning of literary text and analyze it gives

Intertextuality is the “ongoing interaction between poems or stories.” The “intertextual dialogue deepens and enriches the reading experience, bringing multiple layers of meaning to the text, some of which readers may not even consciously notice” (34). The book Siddhartha is related to the life of Buddha which is displayed through the plot through the characteristics of the characters, the doctrines, and specific objects that

“Intertextual dialogue deepens and enriches the reading experience, bringing multiple layers of meaning to the

A story is only as good as the way it is told. The way a writer uses his or her words to say something is just as important as what they don’t say. Charles Baxter, author of plethora of books and university teacher, writes a craft book that goes deeper than the surface of writing and deeper than the words written down. In Charles Baxter’s The Art of Subtext, he discusses how authors can use the words they do write just as much to express what they don’t write.

For several years I failed to grasp the important aspects of literary and rhetorical devices. . However, since the beginning of my junior year my understanding of literary and rhetorical devices has improved substantially. Especially on the correspondence of identifying literary and rhetorical devices when reading. Also being able to incorporate these devices into my writing. Such as in my comparative analysis. I wrote about the irony in “Lamb to the slaughter” by Roald Dahl and “Desiree’s baby by kate chopin”.

In order to evaluate texts using Intertextuality, it is important to define it as a form of critical literary analysis. Charles Bazerman of the University of California at Santa Barbara writes: “We create our texts out of the sea of former texts that surround us, the seas of language we live in. And we understand the texts of others within that same sea…the relation each text has to the texts surrounding it, we call intertextuality” (83). While there are several definitions of intertextuality, Bazerman’s covers the most ground. In this broad sense, intertextuality refers but is not limited to the following components of which written works are comprised: borrowed culture, borrowed genre and theme, and more specifically, borrowed text within

I have used just two examples of intertextuality with reference to names, but there are quite a few. From the example of William Wilson, we can see that by alluding to Poe's work, Auster used intertextuality to make reference to the doppelganger and also possibly to Poe's Detective Dupin stories. By heavily referencing his own name throughout the text Auster used intertextuality in a different way, by not referencing another work but referencing himself he added a completely different aspect to the story allowing for layering on many different

Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code is one of the most successful and controversial novels of our time. Other authors have jumped on the bandwagon writing novels on Christian topics or treasure hunts or simply discussing The Da Vinci Code. Even the film industry has profited by using Brown’s strategies (and topics) in the successful movie National Treasure and by taking advantage of the Grail publicity in TV productions like The Blood of the (Knights) Templar. But which strategies does Brown use to make the reader enjoy reading The Da Vinci Code? In my essay, I would like to focus on his use of narrative techniques.

Leonardo da Vinci is one of the most remarkable painters, sculptors, architects and brilliant philosophers of all time. He was born on April 15, 1452 near Vinci but the biggest part of his life he spent in Florence where he began drawing and after a certain period-painting. When Leonardo was fourteen he began working with Andrea del Verrocchio, who was one of the most recognized painters of his day. Da Vinci’s work soon

While members of the church have dismissed The Da Vinci Code as fiction and lies, Dan Brown claims otherwise. In defense of his novel, Brown starts out the book by stating, “All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate” (Brown 3). By making this statement in the beginning of his book, Brown is setting himself up to be questioned by skeptics. Many critics of the novel are quick to point out every flaw they can find in the novel and quote it as misinformation. The article, “Masterplots II: Christian Literature” by Suzanne Araas Vesely, explains, “It is important to be aware that The Da Vinci Code is literary fiction; the appearance of historical accuracy is only superficial. Brown’s book is a minefield of disinformation for the unwary reader.” Vesely doubts the accuracy in The Da Vinci Code and depicts the readers who take it as fact as ignorant, ill-informed people. While Vesely points out the disinformation given by Brown, in