Examples Of Nature Vs Nurture Debate

The nature versus nurture debate is a controversial issue questioning whether or not human behavior is a result of biology. Nature is the idea that genetics and biology determine an individual’s behaviors and thoughts. The scientific study of how behavior is affected by biology is known as sociobiology. On the other hand, nurture is the idea that human thoughts, feelings and actions are the result of society and culture. In this argument, human behavior is learned through the influence of society, thus can be changed as societies change. In recent times, most scientists support gene-culture evolution. They believe that biology and culture are interrelated; biology is shaped by culture just as culture is shaped by biology. This means

“You inherit your environment just as much as your genes.” (Rich, 2015) In 1869, the phrase “nature vs. nurture was coined by an English polymath named Francis Galton. There are two sides to this debate, each with their own pros and con’s. Nature is the side that argues that the DNA and genotype humans are born with determines who they are and what personality and traits they will have throughout their lifetime. Whereas the nurture side of the debate argues that humans are born with sponges as minds, and through interactions and experiences while we grow, the knowledge and understanding of life is gained and this is how our personalities are sculpted. Many people have studied this debate through multiple schools of thoughts; each with their own arguments to which side they believe prevails. Yet, to this day, there is no proof to say which side of the debate if correct. Based on the psychological, sociological, and epigenetic schools of though, it can be validated that when it comes to the nature vs. nurture debate, nurture will always prevail and remain most relevant.

Susan Evers and Sharon McKendrick, the famous identical twins from the movie The Parent Trap, were separated at a young age by their divorcing parents. Sharon grew up in Boston to a socialite mother while Susan grew up in California on her father’s ranch. Sharon had structure while Susan’s life was very laid back. They looked the same and liked many of the same things, yet their personalities were very different. What is responsible for these differences? Is it simply that they are two different people with different interests and preferences? Or did the environments that they grew up in play a part in making who they are? In the nature vs. nurture controversy, nature proclaims that our genetic make-up plays the primary role in human

A child will feel love and compassion from the comfort of a parent and will exemplify that with anyone they encounter. The parenting style a child endures will shape their judgement of character and determine which parenting style they will use for their own offspring. According to the American Psychological Association, the parenting style a child experiences correlates with the societal, emotional, and individual development a child or adolescent undergoes. A parent that is involved in their child’s life will create a better outcome than a parent who is not involved. Another family dilemma would be if a child were to be adopted into a family that was not blood related. We would correctly make the assumption that nurture has a role within the development of that child. The child would not have the same genes as the family that they were adopted into. The child would develop from nurture based on what the family provides. Some may argue that genes are a vital component with the source of development especially among identical twins; however, I myself am an identical twin and can prove that my genes are not a huge component of my development. People conclude that since identical twins are a mirror of one another physically, that they are the same way cognitively. My sister and I have dissimilar interests and have our own individual personalities that were not predetermined from genes. If the nature argument were to be true, my sister and I should be living in the same place and studying the same major. We have the same genes, but are not completely influenced by biological

The Nature versus Nurture debate concerns the relative importance of an individual's innate qualities versus personal experiences in determining or causing differences in physical and behavioral traits. (Ridley, Matt. "What Makes You Who You Are." Time Magazine. 25 May 2003).

In society, not one person is alike. By saying this, many people believe that they strongly take after their parents. Meaning they think Nature is a big part in their life and why they are who they are. The genes in each cell in us humans determine the different traits that we have, more dominantly on the physical connections like eye color, hair color, ear size, height, and other traits. However, it is still not known whether the more abstract attributes like personality, intelligence, sexual orientation, likes and dislikes are gene-coded in our DNA. The nurture theory has experiments showing a child’s behavior with the environment as to adult behavior. In the Nature Vs Nurture debate, everyone has their own thoughts and ideas on each

“In the real world there is no nature versus nurture, only an infinitely complex and moment-by-moment interaction between genetic and environmental effects,” (Gabor Maté, goodreads.com). Nature is something no one has control over, but nurture is another story. Nature is what is passed down from the parents, such as eye, skin, and hair color. Nurture are the influences around someone, such as peers, the media, friends, and parents. “High school students them former classmates of Nancy and Kenyon Clutter, chanted cheerleader rhymes, bubbled, bubblegum, gobbled hotdogs, and soda pop” (The Answer, 192). In the following paragraphs, I will explain why I believe nurture is more overpowering than nature.

For many years, there has been on the ongoing debate that is referred to as nature vs. nurture. It poses a question that many theorists have contested. Do human personalities and behaviors relate to our genetic makeup, or are we directly influenced by the environment and people that we are subjected to? What is more important, genes or environment? While some theorists take either one side over the other, some believe that both nature and nurture play an active role in human development.

The Nature vs. Nurture debate is one of the oldest arguments in the history of psychology. Since the start of the debate psychologists argued that you were either a product of nature or nurture, not both. Nature enthusiasts suggested that you are a product of your genes, while nurture enthusiasts suggested that you are a product of your environment. What if I told you, you actually could be a product of both? Newer research and experiments suggest that many human traits and behaviors actually result from both genetic and environmental factors. Your genes help to provide the potential for a trait, but in order for the potential of said trait to be realized, your environment has to influence

The nature verses nurture debate, may theories of what determines a person’s personality and behavior. It determines the essential biology or life experience. nature-only views how people come from inborn tendencies and genetically based traits.

Nature is some skills that you get when you're born, and it is passed to you from your parents. Take Jim twins for an example - The Jim twins were reunited when they were 39 and they had a lot of things in common like they both worked on woodworking, they both married girls named Linda and Betty. They were both deputy sheriffs, first son's name was James Allen and same IQ. Jack and Oskar were identical twins who were raised apart. The liked the same stuff because when they met they wore the same jacket and glasses when met. When they met they would see who could do something faster or better. They were casually walking and you could see that they walked alike. When they couldn’t get something they were both stubborn. Once they bake they put a lot of butter and spicy seasoning. When one of them is in an elevator or next to a big group of people they like to sneeze really loudly. Anais and Sam- they both had creative careers, they are both spunky. They had the same sense of humor, have the same smile, they both talk with their hands, same pet peeves. Also there both dramatic, one difference is one of them spoke some French.

The argument of nature versus nurture is seen throughout parenting books and psychology journals. Can a parent truly change a child or is their future preprogrammed from conception? Parents and psychologists alike grapple with the relationship between nature and nurture. Orenstein (2011), a mother of a young girl, argues that gender is a socially constructed concept. Although she acknowledges general heritable and biological aspects of gender, she believes the environment a child matures in affects their expression of gender. Specifically, she believes young girls are socially reinforced to grow up loving dolls, the color pink, and the idea of princesses. Orenstein discusses how biases regarding gender are reinforced by environment, specifically

Nature vs. nurture is a debate that stretches through all periods of time. Since the biblical era to now the issue is still widely debated and even more so relevant right now than it ever has been. It’s beginnings stem from the first great minds who wondered whether one’s genetics decided their psychology, or rather their environment. Essentially that is all nature vs. nurture is; whether a person’s thought process, actions, and behavior are determined by nature or nurture.

This is possibly one of the hardest debates to try and describe to someone. On its face, it’s pretty

In one of the videos we watch there were two twins named Bonnie and Brenda, they were both girls. One of the twins wanted to switch genders. Anis and Sam were also two twins that were different. They didn’t live together and didn’t know each other for 25 years and when they met they were way different. They thought that they would be very alike and everything but they were different and that just shows how nurture is stronger than nature.