Examples Of Response To Conflict Essay

through history, man always seems to be at war. In some cases he is the attacker, in others the defender. In both cases, these wars are broken down into two basic elements, the battles that are fought and the individuals who fight them. The elements conflict, courage, fear, cowardice, heroism, victory, and defeat make up the exploits of war we record in our history books. This paper will deal with war, more specifically, a special exploit within one of the most significant wars ever experienced.

Franklin D. Roosevelt said one of the most recognizable quotes in history during his first Inaugural Address: “The Only Thing We Have to Fear is Fear Itself!” (Roosevelt) Fear is one of the most uncomfortable emotions that humans can experience and it occurs all throughout a person’s lifetime. Terror can also be a very powerful tool to influence society and their decision-making. Fear can drive a population to purchase a product that they deem a necessity or advocate war. The existing fear of death and destruction in Max Brook’s World War Z led to influence survival choices of characters in order to prevent the spread of the infection. Similar circumstances can be observed during World War I and II through the use of propaganda encouraging US citizens to take part in the war effort. When comparing the two scenarios, one is able to understand that both World War Z and the World Wars were able to use the existing fear to influence society and society’s decisions.

World War II is deeply regarded as one of the darkest times humanity has ever been a part of. Such a time period is almost exclusively renowned as an incredibly bloody interval. However, behind the rain of blood is a psychological war. Sir Winston Churchill, the British Prime Minister during World War II was a participant of such a war. The book Churchill and Orwell: The Fight for Freedom (Referenced as Churchill and Orwell) by Thomas E. Ricks visualizes Churchill’s endeavor in World War II as well as this obscure mental war. Churchill had fought this mental war by opposing public disapproval, understanding the enemy and making alliances.

Throughout history, there have been a multitude of examples of wars brought too close to home. At times, there comes a point in war where consideration of innocent lives becomes thin, and all energy is put towards war efforts, rather than any other aspect of human life. These points in history are referred to as total war. Examples of total war can be seen as far back as in the ancient civilizations of Rome and Persia, however, the paragon of total war can be found in World War Two. Based on the overall involvement of a vast multitude of civilians, economies and countries targeted and impacted throughout the war, World War Two is the strongest example of total war in American history.

Gandhi once said, “I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent.” The meaning behind this quote is that violence brings temporary satisfaction, however the pain it causes remains. The important concept to grasp is that people must think about the consequences of their actions and how they will affect others. It may be a great outcome, but for a short period of time; however, it is important to consider rational decisions. This quote relates to the novel All Quiet on the Western Front by Erich Maria Remarque and World War I because at first it is all fun and games until that “good” slowly fades, the evil within the good will continue to remain. World War I included a series

From 1939 through 1941 millions were faced with the violence and devastation of World War II. Life on the Homefront in the United States and Great Britain was difficult and overwhelming.World War II was one of the most bloody battles in history, and most of whom were civilians.In this paper, we will explore what life is like for people during a terrifying war.

An extreme turmoil had been taking place during the early 1940’s. The world was at war. Many young soldiers had grown anxious during this upheaval since

I wish I was taught to stick up for myself, or that someone taught me how to deal with that kind of conflict. Experiencing conflict is one of the best ways to better yourself in that department, but as for me, I have had minimal experience. When a child, I realized that I was too sheltered from anything bad or remotely unpleasant. Even in elementary school, I rarely experienced conflict, I was always taught to mind my own business and to never get myself in the middle of other people’s business, if I did not start with me it should not end with me. So, I kept everything to myself and whenever my friends would fight, I would try my hardest to not pick sides or encourage them to just talk to each other and figure it out themselves. Myself, on

In the article, “Teens Who Fought Hitler” by Lauren Tarshis it shows the challenges and bravery shown when in the middle of a war. A kid named Ben lived in one of the world's harshest times in history. He and his family were forced into a concentration camp. They were not allowed out until the war was over. Ben had to survive in the harsh conditions. Eventually he left his family to join the “war” against Hitler. He would never see his family again. He managed to live through the war, but his family was never to be seen again. They tried their best to fight against Hitler.

A completely different approach from battles in the past was that in World War I, civilians became a new target. When Germany would invade a country, the troops would attack civilians and even imprison them (Audoin-Rouzeau & Becker 45). These prisoners of war were then put into camps on German territory and because of the blockade against Germany created by Britain to lessen their resources; the prisoners were being “deprived” of food (Audoin-Rouzeau & Becker 62). German military would even use the prisoners in battles, turning them into “human shields” for protection (Audoin-Rouzeau & Becker 77). German troops even went to the extreme with attacking civilians by exiling them to face starvation, as German military did with the Armenians (Audoin-Rouzeau & Becker 64). The German military used genocide to ultimately fight against their opposing nations. Another way opposing sides would fight against one another was through the use of tanks and planes, a concept never used before because of technology. Bombs were then dropped onto enemy’s territory, killing almost all innocent people (Audoin-Rouzeau & Becker 108). By using excessive violence, “psychological damage” that was irreversible was inflicted on a vast majority of soldiers, still inflicting harm even after the war ended (Audoin-Rouzeau & Becker 25). This new style of fighting

As much as it is glamorized on television and video games, people have forgotten the realities of war. For in war, soldiers and civilians alike have suffered severely, and combat has put everyone who is involved to a true test of character. An example of the tests of war is found by looking at Germany’s failed attack on the Russian city of Stalingrad during World War II.

They did not have the strength or will to believe in themselves anymore. They also doubted that life would ever return to normal, as it had been before the war. The Western society entered an age of darkness and pessimism. Many intellectuals even began to doubt the future of civilization. Increasing numbers of thinkers and writers expressed their somber views about the new reality of life. Paul Valéry argued that “the best of life is behind us, that fullness is behind us, but disarray and doubt are in us and with us.”8 People didn't know what to expect anymore. Great numbers of men and women were anxious about what the future held for them. Many feared that another war would break out. Valéry states that “The storm has just ended, and yet we are as disquieted, as anxious, as if the storm were still to break upon us…. We do not know what will come forth: still we can reasonably fear it.”9 The storm in this case was the war which left people in such a shock that they looked upon the future with great apprehension and uneasiness. The soldiers that served in the war were hit especially hard by the horror of war. Erich Maria Remarque, a German soldier vividly portrays the carnage of World War II: “We have become wild beasts…. [and] crouching like cats we run on, overwhelmed by this wave that bears us along, that fills us with ferocity, turning us into thugs, into

People should perceive war as an unnecessary diplomatic maneuver that simply scars all under its influence. The horrors of war are innumerable with each one determined to ruin the lives of soldiers, their families, and civilians. All Quiet on the Western Front displays this truth such that it awakens the most nationalistic warmonger. The barbarities of war can come in three forms: physical, mental, and through the aura of manipulation. The physical horrors include the gory combat wounds, the ghastly sights of corpses, blood, and annihilation, and the weapons created and utilized purely for harm. The mental horrors consist of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, the loss of innocence in young men, and animalization. Finally, the fact that

A common source of conflict in India is the lack of a Uniform Civil Code. This argument stems from the discrimination Indian women face under religious personal laws. A Uniform Civil Code replaces patriarchal personal laws with a common set of laws that would govern each citizen and cover matters relating to marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption and maintenance. While India is a democracy, Indian leaders recognize that there are several religious groups living within their borders so they strive to be a pluralist country, a country where there is more than just one center of power, which in India 's case are Muslims, Hindus, and Christians. While this approach looks good in theory, it leaves critical matters such as marriage, dowry, and property rights solely in the hands of religious leaders. This approach allows for the subjectivity of religion to be exploited and removes the checks and balances system that many countries thrive on. The discriminatory nature of these laws is a direct antithesis to the equality that the Constitution grants all of its citizens. While religious leaders argue that changing these laws is an assault on the rights provided to them, it 's also critical to note that they directly assault the laws granted to Indian women. While Articles 25 through 30 of the Indian Constitution protect religious freedom and cultural rights of minorities, Articles 14 through 24 ensure an individual 's rights to equality and freedom. This forces the question: why be