McTeague
The most familiar theorem associated in the novel McTeague is Social Darwinism, which is drawn from Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection. Social Darwinism is the application of the theory of natural selection to social, political, and economic issues (What is Social Darwinism). The concept interprets the “survival of the fittest” theory in which the most adapted will survive the natural conflict of social groups. In its most simplest form, this theory follows the conception that the “strongest will survive” and leads readers to distinguish the naturalistic premise of the novel. In Frank Norris’s novel, McTeague, Social Darwinism is displayed through the failure of McTeague and Trina, and through the success of Old Grannis and Miss Baker.
…show more content…
Both Trina and McTeague originate from lower social status and each try to grow out of this and into wealth in different ways. Trina, though being born into a poor immigrant family, obtains an immense fortune which transforms her into a greedy woman only wanting to seek more. McTeague, also originating from a poor family, tries to stand above his origin by becoming a dentist. When these two characters become one, through marriage, their desire to rise above their social class only cultivates more. McTeague’s ‘intelligent’ profession gives Trina hope that he will be able to get a higher social position and help her to achieve the same. She makes a mistake since she can not see an “animal in a man,” which makes a considerable part of his personality (Norris 21). Their obsession to luxuriate into wealth only fails when McTeague loses his job, leading the two to move down in social status, thus not living their preferred lifestyles (Themes, Symbols and Characters in
Corruption in early America is a major problem for the working class. These aspects of corruption are exposed in The Jungle by Upton Sinclair. There are many different types apparent in this novel. They include political, economical, social, and moral. One example of social corruption, Social Darwinism, is otherwise known as survival of the fittest. Social Darwinism is where the stronger or tougher people in society rank higher and receive more jobs than those who are weak. In Upton Sinclair’s The Jungle, the ideas and problems of Social Darwinism are explored through the struggle to find a job, poor working conditions, and a deceitful population.
After the publishing of Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, many of his followers began to apply the same idea of natural selection to society, believing that the “survival of the fittest” applied to social problems as well nature. It was a common ideology of the time that those who were better off, like wealthy citizens and corporations, were ….because they were better adapted to the environment. Therefore, the wealthy and the corporations were the fittest, and deserved wealth and power because they were adapted to survive. On the other hand, if someone was poor, it was
History and literature have developed in a parallel manner, as organisms often co-evolve with each other. With the publication of Darwin’s groundbreaking work, the Origin of Species, a new group of people, the Social Darwinists, applied the theory of natural selection to social hierarchy. A most notable Social Darwinist, Herbert Spencer, coined the term “survival of the fittest”, implying that people in higher social groups were more “fit” to survive than those who were in lower social groups (Bannister, “Social Darwinism”). This idea of social evolution contributed to the dehumanization of people. More social theorists, scientists, and
In the novel McTeague by Frank Norris, the author touches on various themes throughout the novel. Many of the characters exhibit animalistic qualities, greediness, and/or both. Characters are often compared to as animals, while others let their greed overcome them. Some characters— McTeague and Trina—also return to a previous place and/or state of being. Of all the themes noted in McTeague, the animal-like qualities, the greed, and the reversion of the characters are major reoccurring themes that can be found in the selected passage on page 323 of the novel.
In 1859, Charles Darwin published his most famous work, On the Origin of the Species by Means of Natural Selection (Encarta 96). This book explained Darwin's theory of natural selection, a process not unlike separating the wheat from the chaff, where the least fit are eliminated, and only the fittest survive. An extension of this theory known as Social Darwinism emerged in the late 19th century. "Social Darwinists believed that people, like animals and plants, compete for survival and, by extension, success in life" (Encarta 96). Under this theory, the individuals who acquire the power and wealth are deemed the fittest, while those of lower economic and social levels are considered the least fit (Griffin
The narrator tells of ‘how he cut loose from the charlatan, although McTeague himself seems like a charlatan. His clientele of “butcher boys, shop girls…” also convey a sense of his unsophisticated and uncluttered way of life. The fact that McTeague is satisfied with a life as an inconsequential
In Sinclair’s novel, the jungle, you get a closer look into the societal classes and the struggles that immigrants face when they come to America. In this essay, I will be talking about all the things that Jurgis as well as his family have overcome. Such as their downfalls as well as how they prospered and managed to stay together through most of the novel. Social Darwinism helps you get a different perspective of all the things going on in the societal classes.
Social Darwinism is a theory that individuals, peoples, and groups are subject to darwinian laws of natural selection. Another way to describe social darwinism is survival of the fittest. The strongest and the smartest will survive. It is now largely discredited, it was advocated in the late 19th and early 20th century by Herbert Spencer and others. It was used to justify political conservation, imperialism, to discourage intervention and reform and racism. This theory was used to support the laissez faire capitalism and political conservatism.
Australia is a fresh start, known as the new world and is filled with anglo-celtic people most of them have migrated from great britain and see england as the mother country. But with word of this land of opportunity spreading people from all countries and cultures are flocking to australia to start new lives. The anglo-celtic people however have aren't to happy with this. To them this influx of new people threatens the british “way of life”.
Social Darwinism in McTeague Social Darwinism is the theory that certain classes and groups of people survive and strive because they are superior, and they are more fit for their environment than others. Norris believed that people have to be content with their wealth and status, and be compatible with each other to survive in the urban society. Multiple characters in McTeague represented the idea of Social Darwinism. McTeague and Trina were two examples of citizens that were unfit for their environment, because they were extremely greedy and they did not comply with their social status.
She did not grow up rich and as stated earlier, her fate is to live a simple and laid back life. However, she deviates from her fate and creates complications for herself because of her obsession with money. Trina has $5,000 saved up and a side job, but she does not spend a cent of it, even refusing to give McTeague 5 cents to ride the train back home on a rainy day. Soon enough, McTeague is so frustrated with Trina that he begins to abuse her. He chews on her fingers, “crunching and grinding them with his immense teeth, always ingenious enough to remember which were the sorest” (Norris 244). This marks the beginning of Trina’s deterioration in health. If she had not neglected McTeague in order to save her money, he would not have become so violent towards her. She amplifies her hardships by moving into an even cheaper house--the one Maria died in--and she continues her miserly habits despite McTeague’s abuse. Her cheap attitude causes McTeague to rob and leave her. Additionally, fate punishes her for hoarding money from the Noah’s ark figurines; she loses her fingers. Even though her health is declining, she continues to work. She neglects herself so much that “[she] lost her pretty ways and her good looks. The combined effects of hard work, avarice, poor food, and her husband’s brutalities told on her swiftly” (264).
“For their point of view does not permit of a live-and-let-live kind of carrying on. It is a point of view that justifies itself by a whole hearted acceptance of the worst of Neo-Darwinism, the Allmacht of natural selection applied rigorously to human life and society and Kultur”(p.22, Headquarters Nights by Vernon Kellogg).
Darwin and Evolution are inextricably linked in the minds of most people who have had the opportunity to study them in basic biology. However, Darwin's theories of selection and survival of the fittest have been applied to moral, economic, political, and other cultural aspects of society. Dennett briefly touched on some of the political and social ramifications of Darwin's theories in the final chapter of Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Other philosophers and thinkers have also adapted Darwin's evolutionary ideas, in order to apply them in a societal or cultural context. One great example of this adaptation of the biological concept of evolution, is the appearance of Social Darwinism during the 19th century.
Social Darwinism is a theory that competition among all individuals, groups, nations or ideas drives social evolution in human societies. The term draws upon Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection, where competition between individual organisms drives biological evolutionary change through the survival of the fittest. The term was popularized in 1944 by the American historian Richard Hofstadter, and has generally been used by critics rather than advocates of what the term is supposed to
Social Darwinism was a sociological theory that merged Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection and the work of Herbert Spencer, Malthus, and other scientific and sociological theorists to justify imperialism, racism, and conservative economic policies. The overall acceptance of the power of nature in defining human beings developed during the 18th century Enlightenment. Europe’s exploration not only brought about immense economic and agricultural growth, but also exposed them to “human behavior and life patterns within environments and under circumstances dramatically different than their own” (4). The most popular catch phrases of Darwinism, “struggle for existence” and “survival of the fittest”, when applied to the life of man in society, suggested that nature would provide that the best competitors in a competitive situation would win, and that this process would lead to continuing improvement” (6. Hoft). This misinterpreted sense of superiority engulfed much of society at the time and was used to justify the logistics behind certain actions regarding capitalism, racism, and imperialism. Furthermore, it served as the backbone of some of the most heinous acts imaginable including the genocide and sterilization of certain groups of people.