Violent Punishment Harms Society There’s something intrinsically wrong with harming a being who cannot defend itself. Animal abuse is a disgusting reality most of us would like to ignore; an owner stomping on their “beloved” pet is a visual that can make stomachs turn. Men hitting women is absolutely frowned upon; it’s one of the first actions little boys are taught never to do. So why is it acceptable – sometimes even encouraged – to hit children? Children are adorable and innocent, just like our furry companions, and they’re far weaker than a parent would be, similar to how men and women are. Why then does society condone this form of violence? Of course, there are several answers to this question.
Parents are afraid that if they don’t give their children harsh discipline they will grow to become incompetent members of society. This is a valid concern; no caregiver would ever want to see their child fail. Parents are also imperfect, they become frustrated and tired. Sometimes corporal punishment can be easier to dole out instead of a more productive strategy. What mostly keeps the cycle of corporal punishment going is the “My parents hit me and I turned out just fine” argument. If violent punishment is all someone has ever known, it’s understandable that they would turn to that form of discipline in adulthood. When looking at corporal punishment in this context it seems entirely justifiable; however, this would be ignoring a multitude of data that describes the
In modern society, physical discipline is still considered a somewhat suitable way of teaching children how to behave in life, though it is decreasing in popularity as time goes on. When using physical discipline, the parent should never have the intention of causing harm, they should always have the intention of being constructive. Whether or not physical discipline results in a beneficial outcome is dependent upon how it is used. If it is the only, or primary, source of discipline, the outcome is generally unfavorable. Also, as said in an article by Larzelere and Kuhn, if the discipline is too violent, and results in the child becoming injured, the child is not going to retain the intended lesson (1). An example of non-abusive physical discipline is conditional spanking. Conditional spanking "is defined as about two open-hand swats to the buttocks when a parent is not angrily out of control" (Larzelere, Kuhn 1). This type of punishment "teaches a child to cooperate with the milder disciplinary tactic, thereby making spanking less necessary in the future" (Larzelere, Kuhn 1) . When parents decide to use physical discipline, the primary intention of the parent should always be that the punishment is being "used in such a way that [it] reduces the need to use it in the future" (Larzelere, Kuhn 1). A parent should never hit a child
Reason number one supporters give is, some think it helps your child to understand your rules and by showing them what will happen if it is done. In the article by "Corporal Punishments" it states that "parents have every right to discipline their child that way, since it is perhaps the best way to teach children the difference between right and wrong." Pain is probably the most effective form of discipline." This evidence suggests that you have every right to do this to your child since it is your form of discipline that works for you. Another reason supporters give is that, parents believe that this help to get your child to listen to you. For example, the article by "Corporal Punishments" it states "as long as parents themselves have the right to discipline their children physically a home, schools should be allowed to continue using corporal punishments as well." This passage suggests that by having your child's teacher hit or threaten the child it will get them to get their work done and not disrespect the rules. Another reason supporters use is, by hitting and saying things, they'll become scared of you and won't do anything they aren't supposed to do. Evidence from the article by "Corporal Punishments" it states "For a child to develop soundly, it is important to maintain the same punishments in both locations. If not, the child might get confused about what he or she can get
Child discipline is an important part of parenthood. It is challenging for adults to manage children’s behaviors and find the correct lessons that will benefit their children. According to the research performed by Flynn (1998), most parents in the United States agree that "it is sometimes necessary to discipline a child with a good, hard spanking" (p.26). Socolar et al. performed research which agreed that “corporal punishment of children persists—roughly fifty percent of the parents of toddlers in the United States use corporal punishment as a regular method of disciplining their children.” (as cited in Gershoff, 2010, p.32). That is not to say that physical punishment is the solution as it can stop a behavior immediately but the results
Thomas Eddlem is a longtime freelance writer and high school history teacher. His credentials as related to the topic of corporal punishment is that he is a parent to three children as well as a blogger. His stake in this issue is appropriately used corporal punishment is both effective and beneficial. Additionally, He discloses no noteable financial backing for his opinions. He aims this article at a universal/ friendly audience. His purpose is to persuade the audience to believe that corporal punishment, when used on toddlers, is the most effective means of discipline. He claims a ban
In this generation parents do not like to spank or discipline their children. They don’t like doing this because they think it could hurt their children if they do so. When a child does something wrong they act a certain way, and get into trouble they should get spank for what they did. When a child gets into trouble they should be spanked for it because it teaches great life skills when it comes to it.
We live in a world where punishment is used in order to teach someone a lesson, or to show them that acting a certain way isn’t right. The mission of parents is to be able to teach their kids to surpass them, and to prepare them for the real world. One way of punishment that a lot of parents practice is spanking their children. According to the website, Brookings.edu, it states that in North America, 81% of parents say that spanking their children is sometimes appropriate. While some parents think that spanking is a good way in order to discipline their children, they shouldn’t because it teaches them that violence is the answer, it can cause emotional damage, and it doesn’t teach them how to communicate with other people.
One report shows that “physical punishment doesn’t improve children’s behavior in the long term.” Spanking your kids leads to many negative outcomes including mental health problems. There is even a greater risk for kids to have a serious injury when they are physically abused (“Discipline vs. Abuse”, 2016). Parents are likely to hit when they are angry. Being angry makes people go crazy. Parents could only mean to hit the kid a little, but end up really hurting the kid because they were angry.
The use of corporal punishment teaches children that it is acceptable to use violence to solve problems; however, many people believe using corporal punishment to discipline children is acceptable because it was used on them. Parents
There are people who think that corporal punishment for children is a proper and productive way to discontinue bad behavior. If you spank your children for their bad behavior they will learn not to do it again. Then there are people who think spanking your children is a harsh punishment and use other options like time outs and taking away favored objects. This type of punishment teaches children that what they are doing is wrong and without using violence. Parents and guardians should not be able to spank their children because it can lead to a more violent nature, make it harder for them to make choices in the future, and give them both mental and emotional problems as well as possible physical harm. Stories of parents getting so angry at their child’s behavior they lash out without even thinking and this leads to problems for someone who only made decisions based on what they know, being a kid.
Many parents say physical punishment works on improving behavior or teaching a child a lesson. These parents think this is the only way to discipline a child. So as years pass more parents tend to use this strategy to discipline their own children. According to the Health Update, “one of four 10-16 year olds or 6.2 million children is a victim of assault or abuse every year” also “one-third of the children surveyed said that they were assaulted or abused or that someone had tried to victimize them in the previous year” (Lawton 10). Physical abuse is not effective for any child. Another statistic according to the Public Health article wrote “nearly half of abused and
People that use this type of punishment in my opinion should be punished with jail time. When having kids it’s the duty of the parents to watch and care for their children, when the parents start to abuse it goes against everything about being a mother. The parents are their caretaker, and they depend on them in their first years of growing up, hitting them can result in teaching them that hitting is okay. When hitting should never be the answer to anyone's problem. However some people disagree with me, many adults are convinced that the only way to discipline your child is by physically hitting them. Even though they are aware that words can make a strong impact on children all the parents have to do is speak with a stern tone and show them that they mean what they say. On this website debate.org this person who commented on the contriversal topic of child abuse this young lady who was 16 said, “I think parents have every right to be spanked when they need it. I mean you cannot honestly believe telling a kid no don't do that again is gonna cut it do you?”(“kate.22”) she claims that children won’t understand what no means and won’t learn by talking to them, however, it was also stated that A child just needs a sturdy hand because if a child is beaten after misbehaving, they will grow up believing that violence is the answer to everything. It makes them more vicious, more aggressive and sadistic (“two vic”) he wrote that hitting these children will cause them to be more rebellious and reading that i can agree, i witnessed my cousin get hit every time she did something “wrong” and now she hates her parents and ran away from home at the age of 18. Corporal punishment is a slap on the hand, but when parents start to hit their children over a mistake or something stupid they did, that is abuse. When abusing these children, the parents should be punished. They should do jail time and accept the consequences. When it
Corporal punishment in these days has been becoming a topic in many old timers talks. Many believe that it helps and is definitely the way to go. The older generations still seem to believe that society would be better off if kids still got punished the way they did. They refuse to ignore data that has not supported the clams they bring up about making children better behaved or as they call it “Straightening them up”. Many believe that our liberal democracy population has views that are not valid and that the old ways need to come back to help us grow.
The world has changed in many different ways, but there are still things that need to be changed for the better. Corporal punishment is one of those things. All around the world, corporal punishment is affecting children in many ways. It is described as a form of discipline that hurts a child in a way and is used both in homes and schools. It has been going on for years upon years and very few people try to stop it. People believe corporal punishment is good for children, but there have been so many negative outcomes that other people argue against it. Although some people believe that corporal punishment helps improve a child’s behavior, corporal punishment should not be used because it could be used excessively and it is ineffective.
Corporal punishment is wrong because it causes long-term negative effects on students. If a student receives a paddling as a punishment it could cause serious problems for that student mentally and physically. One example of this is in an article called Should Corporal Punishment Be Used in K-12 Schools?. It says “frequent use of corporal punishment leads to a higher risk for anxiety, depression, substance abuse, stress, and other mental health”. These would be dangerous for a child’s health. In serious cases this could even lead to suicidal thoughts. Not only can corporal punishment affect a child's mental health, it can also have an affect on their performance in school. Another example from an article says, “Students who experience corporal punishment in
Discipline has always been an effective way to guide children. There are many forms of discipline that parents use and they all have an effect. Some work better for some children while other forms may work for another. Parents can sometimes be stuck with how they should discipline their children and they want to know more about what is effective. In terms of punishment one form that is commonly used is corporal punishment, which is punishment in the physical form. One form of corporal punishment is spanking. For years and years, the spanking debate has been a major parenting dilemma. There are those that believe that spanking is wrong and shouldn’t be used and there are others who believe that sometimes a good spanking gets the point