Executive Branch Of Government Power

Minimal government regulations are an evident factor where a stronger emphasis is placed on the local governments along with the development of policy and markets. An example of a limited government would be the United States due to the U.S. Constitution bounding abilities. Another key principle of the U.S Constitution is the concept of checks and balances and how it regulates the branches of government. The system of checks and balances is an important component of the Constitution due to its basic function of keeping the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial branches in check, but it also establishes the that no branches should be overpowering the others and vice versa. The legislative branch is responsible for enacting state laws and granting money so the government may operate optimally. The executive branch is responsible for implementing and administering policy intended for the public and receives funding from the legislative branch. And the judicial branch is responsible for interpreting the U.S. constitution

(James Madison, Federalist Paper #51, Document A). Madison is referring to a federalism, where powers are divided between the Central and state governments. In the finalized constitution that resulted, the Central government is able to regulate trade, conduct foreign relations, provide an army and navy, declare wars, print and coin money, and set up post offices. The states governments were permitted to set up local governments, hold elections, establish schools, and pass marriage and divorce laws, and regulate in-state businesses. Both are able to borrow money, set up courts, and make and enforce laws. The delicate balance of distribution of powers prevents either the state or central governments from taking too much control. While the national government deals with foreign and national domestic relations, the state governments deal with almost all local matters, and they both have a few shared powers, resulting in a comfortable balance. (Document A)

The idea about separation of powers is established through the three branches of government. These three branches are legislative, executive, and judicial. Document B shows that each branch has their own specific powers. The legislative branch holds power regarding the Senate and House of Representatives. The executive branch is home of the President and deals with the congress. The judicial branch has control over the supreme court and appointing judges. The three branches of government fight against tyranny by ensuring that no one branch has too much power over the other

The Constitution, however, provided for division of power of the National government into three distinct branches, each with specified duties. The Legislature composed of the Senate and House of Representatives is mandated with making laws (Maier, 2010). The executive was to enforce laws with the President while the Judiciary and inferior courts is to judge using the law. A mechanism was also provided to each of the three branches to view the power on other two and encroachments into other branches ' powers.

Even though a select few governments today are federal, many are unitary governments. All power resides in the central government, and citizens vote for central government officials, not state government officials. Great Britain and France are examples of unitary governments. Each British county has little power compared to the power United State’s state governments have. If the French Assembly wants to redraw the boundaries of local governments or change the ways they operate, it can. If the U.S. Congress wants to abolish a certain state, like Utah, it cannot. U.S states have the power to make certain laws for their own local governments, and they get their power directly from the Constitution. For example, states can make laws about taxation of their citizens and speed limits. Compared to a federal form of government, unitary governments are one sided when it comes to power.

One absolute similarity with these two articles covering the executive branch on the presidential power both claim that President Bush and President Obama use of their powers for their own advantage, or at a higher extent of what they are given in Article II of the Constitution. In my opinion, the power of the U.S. president should not be lessened for presidents later on down the line. Congress allows a lawless executive branch- or lose authority as is, if more was added restricting the president to his constitutional powers, is there a point to a president? In the article Obama is not a Monarch, Ted Cruz explains the president’s executive amnesty; calling it a lawless executive branch. As well as in the article The Founders’ Great Mistake by Steve

Legislative, Judicial, and Executive are the three branches of government, each one has it's own unique operations. The Executives branch, primary power relies with the president, he chooses his vice president, and his Cabinet members. An essential function of the executive branch is to ensure that laws are carried out and enforced. The legislative branch, consists of the senate and the house of representatives, better known as Congress. There are hundred senators, two from each state.

The Executive branch has the power to command the Armed Forces, deal with other international powers and many more. The Legislative Branch is lead by the Congress which includes the House of Representative and the Senate. The purpose of these two bodies is to make laws. This specific branch has the power to pass laws, approve treaties and originate the spending bills. Lastly the Judicial branch is lead by the Supreme Court, this branch has the power to review and evaluate laws, interpret the Constitution and decide the cases involving the state’s rights. Those 3 branches are another part that makes up the American Government. Checks and Balances was a system built into the Constitution because of the creation of the 3 branches. This system was assembled so that each of the three branches of government would need each other in order

The executive branch of the federal government is the branch that is responsible for putting laws into action. The executive branch is made up of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. The Prime Minister is the leader of the political party that wins the most seats in the House of Commons. The members of the Cabinet also belong to the leading political party and are Members of Parliament (MPs) or senators. The Prime Minister and the Cabinet also propose most of the laws. The executive branch is the head of the government and runs the day-to-day part of the federal government.

There are things that both governments have the power to do; like collect taxes. National government has control over currency. State government has control over some laws like: property laws, banking laws, public health, education,criminal laws and licensing of professions. Police powers belongs to the states. Now that I have been reading and researching about this topic, I think it is safe to say that the states have a lot more powers than the national government does. This limited government is beneficial to the people of our country, in my

2. The president’s power is and will always be limited by the congress. Some examples of powers that are limited are:

In my opinion, government power is not well balanced. The judicial arm is clearly too powerful. There are supposed to be ways of checking the power of the judiciary, but they aren't working. The Supreme Court gets away with far too much, such as stealing from a presidential candidate his right to find out whether he actually won or lost the election. Another recent instance being Maryland being upheld by Congress to create a Bank of the United States.

The Constitution’s Preamble mention that the federal government was established to “form a more perfect union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote

Executive Power is vested in the President of the United States by Article II of the Constitution. Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the American Constitution, called the 'Executive Vesting Clause ' has been the constant focus of constitutional analysis, even at the time of its ratification. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton famously debated this clause in 1793, on the specific issue of residual authority given to the President above and beyond powers as enumerated in the Constitution. The power and authority of the President affects not only the President himself, and the two arms of the Congress, but also the freedoms and rights of U.S. citizens. The precise delineation of executive power has been the subject of notable Supreme Court cases particularly with respect to foreign affairs and war. Today in the United States, due to the 'War on Terror ', issues of executive power are again prominent topics with respect to American law and politics. To some extent, jurisprudence in terms of the President 's executive powers finds a foundation in the concurring opinion by Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson from the Steel Seizure Case. Rendering his opinion on that case, Justice Jackson stated that Presidential powers fluctuate and are not fixed relative to whether they concur or disagree with the relative powers of the Congress. According to Kozinski, Justice Jackson prepared a sliding scale that illustrated the

Legislative: This branch of the government has the power to create and change laws. The legislative branch is composed of the House of Commons and Senate.