Executive Order Persuasive Essay

A Federal Judge temporarily barred Trump’s Executive Order concerning the travel ban. This has caused extreme controversy among American’s as topics such as immigration, refugees, vetting, and religion all take tolls on the perspectives of the media as well as the average American. Nevertheless, the travel ban has been critiqued as well as praised by different groups and the Federal’s Judge’s emergency order has sparked debate on the constitutionality of the order.

(WEN) - Two weeks ago President Donald Trump signed an executive order to support immigration enforcement and punish local governments that don't comply with federal authorities. This includes potentially taking away funding for any city that deems itself a sanctuary city.

The bill “seeks to protect faith-based providers from adverse actions for exercising their deeply held religious beliefs,” Frank said.

From what I know, every year the winner of the NBA Championship, World Series, and of course the super bowl. Being that the New England Patriots have just won the super bowl, the team has been invited to come on down to the white house and meet with president Trump and his administration. This is music to the ears of the team quarterback who has gone golfing with, and is an avid supporter of President Trump. All was fine and good until some of the players decided they don’t want to go. One of these freedom fighters whose name is LeGarrette Blount told NFL journalist Rich Eisen that "I will NOT be going to the White House. I don't feel welcome in that house. I'll leave it at that”(Zaru). A few of Blount’s teammates have joined him on this and the current number not attending as of 6:30 Pm on friday is 6 of the players. There are 53 men on the roster and here are 6 men that feel as if

Government-appointed officials can face controversy throughout their careers concerning their religious liberties. In this country, there are different points of view on how constitutional rights, specifically First Amendment right, should play into their jobs. While these officials still have basic rights as citizens, they are restricted within their duties, especially in the cases of completing public services for individual citizens. In his article “12 Rules for Mixing Religion and Politics”, Peter Montgomery stated, “As individuals, public officials and public employees enjoy the same religious liberty protections as all Americans… However, a public official has no right to cite religious beliefs as a reason for failing to uphold the duties of their office or for discriminating against some constituents….” Considering this, public officials are free to express

As part of the promise he made to religious leaders during his 2016 presidential campaign, on May 4, 2017, President Donald J. Trump signed a Presidential Executive Order Promoting Free Speech and Religious Liberty. This mandate, in opposition to the Johnson Amendment, is used to circumvent the Internal Revenue Service’s ability to revoke the tax-exempt status of a church, thereby granting them an inalienable right

Under the Obamacare, only employers who owned a “closely-held” corporation could file a religious exemption including houses of worship and the Trump administration believed that all corporations should have the “same protections” and be able to qualify for an exemption. (Pear 40). This concerns Pear’s audience of women rights advocates, women in the Obamacare program and the federal government because women right advocates will most likely argue that Trump’s mandate infringes women's right to seek contraceptive, many women in the Obamacare program will now be responsible for paying contraceptive coverage and the federal government will need to observe how the public reacts to this impactful change to health care.

If a same-sex couple comes to get married and is turned away, they feel this is unjust, especially now that marriage equality is officially a law in the United States, though many states are still denying it. How can the U.S. government have a law that makes same-sex marriage legal in all fifty states, an amendment that states the government will not intervene with one's right to freely practice their religion, and still have others' complaints being the reason for so many in jail? No, a religious leader should not be forced to execute a same-sex marriage. And the complaints of others are misunderstandings of the law. These ministers that refuse to do these things that go against their faith, are also exhibiting examples of civil disobedience. They are basing their actions on what they believe is right and wrong. This positively affects the society because many same-sex couples will now see that they are still allowed to get married, but they should not force ministers to go against what they believe

After the first week of Donald Trump’s presidency many changes have been occurring in the country. A continuous stream of executive orders signed by the President are causing extreme controversy. Executive Order: Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into The United States, the more moderate version of the “Muslim ban” that President Trump called for during his campaign was signed on Friday. Some people who were still in the air when Trump signed the order were detained or sent back to where they flew in from when they landed. This led to people being detained in airports sparking numerous protests at airports across the country, calling the order unconstitutional. On Saturday, a federal judge temporarily stayed the order, stopping people from being detained and deported from the country.

Regarding Erwin Chemerinsky’s article from January 29, 2017, “Op-Ed Trump's cruel, illegal refugee executive order,” I am happy to see this issue raised publicly. I believe Trump’s banned order is unacceptable because it is discriminate, unconstitutional, and inhumane. Firstly, it is discriminate because no one should be banned from entering the Unit States of America base on the nationality. This means any banned nationals with immigrants are not allowed and discriminated with voided visa. Secondly, it is unconstitutional because this order is breaking the first amendment which allows an individual’s region should not favor over another. In the article, Trump also told Christian news that will give Christians a greater help. Thirdly, it is

From a Constitutional perspective, Donald Trump’s policies violate the First Amendment by creating this order he

The Times Editorial Board suggests republican nominee Donald Trump is wrong about religious freedoms being silences by the IRS. As clergy from any sect are allowed to support any political person running for office during a sermon. According to 501(c)(3) tax-exempt charitable organizations, and the only pastors or clergy from any sect are supporting the Democratic nominee. Religion is a powerful tool for millions of people throughout the world, some believe we should end tax exemption for religious institutions and religion could possibly be the only influence in someone’s life, other individuals believe religion should stay out of politics, while others are very strong to support religions right to express their opinion on who the next presidential candidate should be through the First Amendment.

President Trump has made about 15 executive orders since his inauguration. The first executive order by Trump was signed hours after his inauguration. The executive order was to revoke funding for Obamacare. Revoking Obamacare affects everyone with Obamacare insurance.Many Americans with financial trouble will now be having trouble finding health care.

“Your assignment is to write a persuasive essay and present it to the class in a week. You will be graded based on how convincing it is. Today we will be choosing topics,” announced Mr. Bowerbank, my 7th grade English teacher and ruler of classroom 110. My class simultaneously groaned at the prospect of work. I simply lifted my head with intrigue as it was already May and about time we had our first essay. He then proceeded to give examples of topics we could choose and gave us some time to think before we had to tell him our topic. My classmates were already rushing to tell the teacher their idea lest someone else steal it. That meant the usual abortion, death penalty, or drug use topics were out. I really couldn't think of anything and the teacher was slowly making his way through the remaining students like an executioner beheading criminals in a line. I have always thought that he would make a marvelous supervillain if he had a curly mustache, a tophat, and a cape. Eventually my name was called. I slowly dragged myself over to his desk. Even sitting down, he still seemed to tower over me. “What is your topic Cindy?” As usual in such desperate times, my mind turned to food. “Waffles are better than pancakes.” I figured that a waffle was just a differently shaped pancake with a nicer texture. “Hmm. Excellent topic. I look forward to your essay!” I survived to live yet another day.

Religious freedom remains a highly-debated issue in the United States. Religion has the power to completely dictate someone’s life and their decisions because it is often the most or one of the most important parts of a person’s life. I am a Christian, and because of this, my life revolves around my God, and the decisions I make in my life reflect what I learn from the Bible. For others, religion is merely a self-identifier that doesn’t play a huge role besides otherwise. The extent to which a people believe or practice their religion is irrelevant when it comes to the Constitution. On 4 May 2017, President Donald Trump issued an executive order, declaring that day a National Day of Prayer. He did this again on September 3rd of the same year as a comfort for the victims of Hurricane Harvey. The National Day of Prayer, having been debated for many years since its introduction, can be analyzed with the First Amendment, containing a Wall of Separation and the free exercise clause to establish that it should be constitutional.