Executive Summary-Take-All System

The system is obsolete owing to the new methods of research and becoming aware of issues as well as faster sharing of information for the Americans to know any presidential candidate. Besides, United States of America has witnessed growth almost in every aspect of life and has shown the ability to handle new developments articulating the strength of the country to establish and manage a new electoral system. The reality that most of the states do not have laws requiring electors to vote according to the will of their state, the electors are unbound thus the system create the possibility of rogue electors. Also, the system presents a situation where the presidential election winner is determined by the House of Representatives causing disenfranchising a significant number of voters.

The Electoral College is an excuse of the electoral process, proving itself to be undemocratic, false in representation, and harmful to third-parties. Therefore, the Electoral College should be abolished, and the process should rely on the popular vote to have the leading judgement in the election procedure for a new president. The Electoral College has proven that a candidate may not need to win the popular vote of the people of the nation in order to win the presidential election. But first, beforehand, let me introduce the system in which the Electoral Process is based upon. The Electoral Process is the government’s created system of indirect voting in order to elect the nation’s president.

In the election of 1824, Andrew Jackson ran against John Quincy Adams and won more of the popular vote and electoral college but failed to get the majority.(Document 3) Since no one won the majority of the electoral college, the House of Representatives was able to choose the next president. The House of Representatives then chose John Quincy Adams. Andrew Jackson was the most popular choice among the citizens so he should have had office instead of John Quincy Adams. When there is no majority, and more than two candidates are running for office, the two most popular candidates should be taken and another election should be held between the two most popular candidates. If there is still a split and no one has still received the majority, the House of Representatives should then decide. This gives the power to the people rather than a select 435 people. This helps to set the stage for why a winner take all system allows for a lack of

The political system many of us know today as the Electoral College is one that has been in place in our country for over 100 years. The Electoral College is a system that helps determine who is elected as President and Vice President during major elections. The Electoral College is the primary source of determining who is elected. This system although having withheld through the times and stayed in place is not effective to me, and can lead to unfair elections in the eyes of some American People.

The article, “Electoral College: An Overview,” written by Ballaro, Beverly, Bourassa, and Cheryl, explains how the electoral college is used and why people do not support it. This article targets anyone who is able to vote in the 2016 election. The purpose of this article is to inform voters that their vote does not always choose the president and explains how the president is chosen and the system behind it. The thesis of this article explains that many people abroad are still unaware that the president is not elected directly by the people. The president is chosen by the electoral college. The electoral college is a body of electors chosen to elect the president and vice president of the united states. This setup allows the chance for an

In this country, we hold elections every four years to select the president. The founding fathers of our country established the electoral college to give the original thirteen states a fair voice in the election process. This country electoral called the electoral college into question on more the one occasion. In the most recent election, President-elect Donald Trump won the electoral vote over Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton won the popular vote. This election has sent the country into an uproar and citizens of the United States are now challenging the legitimacy of the electoral college process. This paper will examine whether this process is reliable and valid when choosing the leadership of this country.

There are several people within the states that have the power to chose the President. There is a system to help it is called Electoral College. People would vote as normal and then all the votes for the state would determine the states candidate. This can help or hurt the the people for the opposing candidate. There need to be changes to the Electoral College and how many electoral votes are determined.

If a candidate wins the popular vote but not the electoral, then they do not win the election. This is unfair. If the people want a certain person for their leader

In the United States, the Electoral College determines the victor of a national election. Each state has its own number of electoral votes, which is determined by state population. This system is a “winner takes all” system. Which means the candidate with 50 percent or more of the votes in an individual state gets all of that states electoral votes. The 2016 presidential election will have 538 electoral votes, this means that the election will be decided who is the first candidate to 270 votes. Some people have seen this system as outdated and unjust. Many are looking at a way to change the system and others would like to do away with the system

Perhaps, the most common criticism of the Electoral College is the winner-take-all system, which picks the wrong winner, the candidate that did not win the popular election. How is that possible? The winner-take all system awards that entire states elector votes to the candidate that obtains the greatest of the popular vote, but in the case of a narrow edge (the candidate that comes in second) gets no electoral votes at all. This means if a candidate wins 3000 votes in a state, and the other wins 2998, the latter gets none of the Electoral College votes

Larger states, like California and Texas, are a main focus for candidates because of the number of electoral votes that they would earn. Also, a president can be elected, even if he or she does not represent the ideas or opinions of the people. In rare cases, a president can win the popular vote and lose the electoral college vote. “If this is the case, the very large margins secured by the losing candidate in the other states would add up to over 50% of the ballots cast nationally. Therefore, the losing candidate may have gained more than 50% of the ballots cast by voters,” says “Does Your Vote Count? The Electoral College Explained”. If the people vote for a particular candidate, that candidate should be president. Finally, people who disagree with their states are not represented due to the “‘winner take all’” system. A person may vote for the democratic candidate but the republican

The Constitution of the United States of America created a system called the Electoral College where it outlines the rules in which we elect the President of the United States of America. As stated in Article 2, Section 1 of the U. S. Constitution created the Electoral College. Each state receives as many electoral votes as it has senators and representatives. Therefore, each state, including the District of Columbia, will have at least three electors. This is the vision of the Constitution. Now the problem arises when all the Electoral votes from one state are given to the popular winner for that state. This causes a with people’s right to chose their leader as votes of the people that voted for the losing candidate are tossed in the trash. All this while giving the state the ultimate power to elect the president.

In the Unified States, the Discretionary School decides the victor of a national decision. Each state has its own number of appointive votes, which is controlled by state populace. This framework is a "champ takes all" framework. Which implies the competitor with 50 percent or a greater amount of the votes in an individual state gets the greater part of that states appointive votes. The 2016 presidential race will have 538 discretionary votes, this implies the race will be chosen who is the main possibility to 270 votes. A few people have seen this framework as obsolete and treacherous. Many are taking a gander at an approach to change the framework and others might want to get rid of the framework

Even though there may be some flaws in the system, it has been working since our government began. And the American people elect the electoral voters, who vote for the president based on that counties vote. This process may be corrupt at times, but if you look at this year’s election people wanted a change, and elected Donald Trump. The popular vote was against him, but throughout the country many counties switched sides and voted for him. Many of the votes Hilary obtained came from bigger cities who are always Democrat. This essay will take some thinking, but it is something that has happened recently and opened my

Another voting system used is the Single Transferable Vote System. The idea is that people vote just for the candidates and not parties. Several candidates are put up in a