On Tuesday the 20th of September, a presentation was required of all students to show a video of individual experiments after a week was given on the day of the original assigning. Given the task of performing an experiment in order to become acquainted with the Scientific method, students of Biology 621A were required to record their experimentations in full - providing a question to be answered, constructing a hypothesis, designing an experiment that would aid in the proving (or disproving) of the hypothesis and collecting the data found from the experiment. These would go on to be graded based on their overall presentation quality, and content in regards to the mastery of the scientific method while proving its functionality and existence in scientific experiments no matter how small, while determining factors like independent or dependant variables.
After inspecting Rebecca Penny’s experiment, it’s enough to conclude that it mainly focused around the question – Is it possible
…show more content…
Based upon the variables, equipment and the main question to be answered – no data can really be questioned or collected as it is more of a yes or no answer. Although, a method is present for collecting the data as the visual feedback of the experiment will dictate if it works – but if it had to be done, a table indicating yes or no would be a valid way of collecting such data.
PROCEDURE:
For the experiment to be carried out it was required of the experimenters to first fill up two cups of the same height to the halfway point, filling one of the chosen cups with 6 tablespoons worth of table salt. Once done, it was required of the experimenters to stir the salt water solution to ensure that the salt had properly dissolved with a spoon. Once done, the two eggs would be inserted into the normal water, then the salt water – from which they determine a conclusion on data that was found.
a. Change the 24th bead to a different color. What does the sentence say now (re-read the entire sentence)? Does the sentence still make sense?
1. Develop hypotheses predicting the effect of pyrite and coal on the acidity of water?
The protein molecules in many foods provide the amino acid building blocks required by our own cells to produce new proteins. To determine whether a sample contains protein, a reagent called Biuret solution is used. Biuret solution contains copper ions. However, the chemical state of the copper ions in Biuret solution causes them to form a chemical complex with the peptide bonds between amino acids (when present), changing the color of the solution. Biuret solution is normally blue, but changes to pink when short peptides are present and to violet when long polypeptides are present.
What observations can you make regarding the gene pool and gene frequency of the surviving individuals?
Procedure: Using distilled water, premeasured containers and objects determine displacement of fluids and density of objects. Use ice and heat measure temperatures in Celsius, Fahrenheit and Kelvin.
C. An unknown, rectangular substance measures 3.6 cm high, 4.21 cm long, and 1.17 cm wide.
The luminous yellow flame is smoky because no air is entering the burner and hydrocarbon is converted into carbon dioxide
In order to conduct this experiment, a hypothesis had to be made on what would happen to the egg when it is placed in water and the question was answered by saying that it would alter in shape because of osmosis. Osmosis is when water moves from an area of lower solute concentration to an area of higher solute concentration. Then after making our hypothesis, the experiment was started by grabbing the egg from the bucket of vinegar with our hands. Second, the egg had to be taken to the sink and gently rubbing the egg with the pad of our thumb to clear off the outside, while the water was poured over it. Third, the mass of the egg had to be recorded , which was our initial mass, by putting it on the mass scale. Fourth, a cup was filled with water
Urey –Miller Experiment Description of the Urey-Miller Experiment In 1953 Urey and Miller were working at a university of Chicago, directed an experiment which would alternate the method of scientific investigation into the origin of life. Urey and Miller used very basic apparatus to conduct this experiment, they used: • 2 conical flasks • glass tubing • Power supply • methane (CH4) • ammonia (NH3) • hydrogen (H2) • water (H2O) Urey and Miller gathered a closed system which he pumped a mixture of gases that were methane, ammonia and hydrogen. One of the conical flasks was half full of boiling in order to add water vapour to the mixture and the gases were circulated around the apparatus. The gases mixed together created a high voltage electrical spark and then passed through a condenser to cool it down before going through a “trap” cooled in ice to collect any liquid products.
The most important part of the experiment was not whether the hypothesis was correct, but it was what I gained from the project. As I progressed with my experiment, I learned many things. My knowledge of the Bay Laurel, Laurus nobilis, plant expanded greatly. I learned that the Bay laurel was a large shrub with green and glossy
The universal messages being portrayed in this chapter is discovering the fundamentals of scientific research and what to do with data. The importance of this chapter shows past examples of experiments. These social experiments such as the Clever Hans experiment could give examples on what a fact, theory, and a hypothesis. The information in the chapter
The purpose of experiment 1 and 2 was to use AirTrack equipment to experimentally verify Newton’s Second Law in a friction-free environment and to analyze the energy transformation and conservation when a conservation force does work on an object within a system. The lab method that allowed us to achieve the lab purpose was using the experimental values obtained from using AirTrack and comparing it to the theoretical values obtained. The purpose of these courses two courses is that, the first experiment a constant net force but not constant mass as we added 0.100kg to the glider each run. The second mass had constant masses as we transferred 0.010 g to each glider. From table 1 you can examine that as mass increases, the acceleration. There are examples
This experiment will test the hypothesis that there is no difference between Core Biology students who meet outside of class to study and Core Biology students who do all of their studying on their own in terms of grades.
Summary: The article was mainly about the effects priming can have on an individual. The article thoroughly explains how thinking about a behavior, primes a person to engage in the same behavior they were just thinking about. The author describes this as an automatic effect, claiming we conduct certain behaviors unintentionally, using experiments to convey that behavior and attitude are automatic. The example used in the article to back up the author’s claim is stereotyping. The author believes individuals naturally stereotype, which ultimately has an effect on their behavior.
Turning to the institutionalization of biology, the term ‘biology’ came to be employed rather self-consciously in some quarters around the turn of this century for experimental biology. The insistence on experiment was used to help legitimize a series of new sciences, genetics among them, as distinct from natural history, botany, zoology, systematics, paleontology, and speculative Darwinian evolutionism. Part of the point of excluding these old-fashioned sciences was that they did not have adequate means of testing explanatory hypotheses or, worse yet, they did not even offer genuine explanatory hypotheses. One aspect of the movement toward experimental biology was the physics-envy of biologists and their long struggle of biology to demonstrate