Explain The Meaning Of A "T-Shaped Person."

Zakaria begins his argument by establishing the opposing viewpoint that “technical training is the new way forward." This summarization of the opposing viewpoint builds his credibility and relatability through recognizing the opposing viewpoint, thus increasing Zakaria’s own ethos. Then Zakaria quickly counters by introducing his primary claim; that “a broad general education helps foster critical thinking and creativity." This “critical thinking and creativity” is later defined by Zakaria as innovation, He states that “innovation is… understanding how people and societies work… need and want." Directly following this claim is a slew of evidence, in favor of Zakaria’s primary claim, that includes statistics based on test scores from international STEM testing in 2012, and statistics on the countries with the top “venture-capital investments as a percentage of GDP." These statistics build Zakaria’s logos by adding real life support to his claim. Zakaria then transitions to his next secondary claim, that “companies often prefer strong basics to narrow expertise." This claim is supported by four

4. How does your view of behavior affect how you might address this consulting assignment?

As the author states, “Innovation begins with someone being aware enough to sense a new need” (Kanter, 2003). Being a person who has always struggled with adapting to new things, I would definitely benefit from strengthening this skill so that I am equipped with the necessary tools that will allow me to sense when there is a need for change as well as being able to identify the gaps between what is and what could be. Another weak area for me is skill #4: Enlisting Backers and Supporters: Getting Buy-Ins, Building Coalitions”. Strengthening this skill will allow me to bring on board the right people who are needed to help successfully implement the change as having too many people involved with the process could cause a delay in the implementation of the change, or could result in failure. This will require me to communicate my vision in order to find out who is receptive of the change and who is resistant as well ask finding out exactly who I will need to help with the change process.

This was by far the most challenging course that I have encountered while obtaining my Master’s Degree in Educational Technology from UCMO. That is not a negative comment as this course has actually impacted me professionally more than any other course I’ve taken to date. This course has taken more time to complete the assignments, more of my attention to detail, and more of my creativity. The last point was the best part about this course. I consider myself to be fairly creative and this course definitely allowed me to do that while bringing my somewhat odd personality to a professional forum. For this I am grateful. Let’s get to the good stuff, shall we?

Growing up in the Silicon Valley, I’m surrounded by people who value embracing the quirky and nerdy side that can lead to creative thinking. Their diverse intellectual passions have shown me how I can make my own difference in the world by realizing that there is no single mold that I fit into.

T = How will I tailor the learning experiences to the nature of the learners I serve? How might I differentiate instruction to respond to the varied needs of students?

I've always been a calm and collective individual, favoring the slow and calculated approach to problem solving, assuring the problem is achieved to maximum success. As such, I'm the kind of person to try everything first hand, in order to find out the true best way in order to accomplish a task, despite what a guide may say. However, I also have the intelligence to do so in a productive way. They say you shouldn't reinvent the wheel, and to build upon others success, at some point someone tried just that, and was able to create a 'better' wheel. At the end of the day, it is still a wheel, but it's this innovation that drives the world forward. I'm an innovator. I'll be the guy trying the thing no one thought of, using some method someone dismissed as 'xp waste' and still be able to put some spin on it in order to create something that is better than everything else.

Tasks There are three tasks to this assignment. A Letter B Case Studies C Short answer questions

At these times, in compound business environment and growing competition, to be able to compete on the job market you need to possess outstanding skills and be always a step ahead of others. Being a good learner and constantly developing one’s

“We’re drawn to the image of the lone genius whose mystical moment of insight changes the world. But the lone genius is a myth; instead, it’s group genius that generates breakthrough innovation. When we collaborate, creativity unfolds across people; the sparks fly faster, and the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.”

Gore's competency to attain innovation can be traced from the company's culture where employees are encouraged to feel free, collaborate through self-motivation, and communicate among themselves. Gore's innovation stems from contributions made by flexible working schedules allocated to employees. Gore has granted all employees one day off per week in order to pursue their personal commitments (Hamel & Breen, 2007). New employees at Gore are put into wider roles, which include business development leaders or R&D engineers and not other narrowly defined jobs. In order to assist the new recruits to be at their best, each is allocated a guide who gives the newcomer guidelines on the norms of the organization. Instead, bosses are teams, which are made by associates. In this case, tasks are only accepted and are never assigned, but associates dedicate and commit themselves because this is the only way they are measured. This is a voluntary commitment, and many find it hard to keep up with it and opt to leave (Deutschman, 2007).

There are many personal characteristics that can affect a person as an individual and his professional success, namely openness, ability to learn and adapt etc. These personal characteristics can sometimes make a person successful and sometimes doesn’t. As I spend more and more time as a professional, I perceive that there are few characteristics that are essential for professional success: namely ambitious, creative and adaptable. These characteristics come out in many different ways. Have you set your goals? Have you decided the path you have to take to pursue your goal? What are the sacrifices you can do to achieve your ambition? How much can you think out of the box to resolve a particular issue or bring new idea to the table? How

Within their jointly authored case study entitled Deep Smarts, Harvard professors Dorothy Leonard and Walter Swap seek to quantify the intangible set of intellectual abstractions which combine to form the foundation of extreme competence in an employee. Citing that rare but harmonious connection between "raw brainpower" and "emotional intelligence," Leonard and Swap posit the existence of "deep smarts," which they define as "the stuff that produces that mysterious quality, good judgment" (2004). Seemingly an amalgamation of human attributes which aid in decision making and critical judgment, deep smarts would appear to be the highly functioning union of intuition, instinct, intelligence and insight. The authors base their conception of deep smarts on the value of firsthand experience, by noting repeatedly that deep smarts are "based more on know-how than on facts; comprising a system view as well as expertise in individual areas" (Leonard & Swap, 2004). According to the authors, most corporations and large-scale organizations have members, from executives to temporary employees, who possess deep smarts through the "judgment and knowledge - both explicit and tacit - stored in their heads and hands" (Leonard and Swap, 2004), but these valuable assets are routinely overlooked and underutilized. The purpose of the case study is to present managers, and others responsible for maximizing an organization's efficiency, with viable methods for identifying those employees with deep

In order for one to completely explore the task expected from the author, it is paramount to understand the meaning of the terminology used in this essay.

NOTE: Question 2 is designed to help you visualize who are the key individuals or organizations linked to the main actor in the case and nature of their relationship. The main actor is typically faced with major decision(s)/ issues. This exercise helps you see how all the individuals/organizations you map on this figure are “connected” to the main actor. It also forces you to think about which individuals are important enough to merit a mention on this figure and why? Frequently you would need to understand the motives, agenda and incentives of these individuals when you recommend a course of action or try to find explanation for the choices they make. Question 3: Create a two column table. Go back to your marked-up copy of the case and write down a list of terms/jargon that you are unfamiliar with in the first column. In the second column guess what that term may mean. Does not matter how little confidence you have in your guess – you must guess! See below for a schematic.