Explain The Skills Required By Executive Assistants

An authoritative leader addresses the end but generally gives workers freedom to innovate, experiment and take risks. The authoritative style works best for organizations that are off track, it helps in creating a new course and fresh long-term vision. The affiliative style strives to keep employees happy to create harmony among. The style has a positive effect on communication. People who like one another a lot talk lot. They share ideas, inspirations leading to flexibility, innovation and risk taking. This style should only be employed when trying to build team harmony. The democratic style allows leaders to build consensus through participation. By spending time getting people’s ideas, a leader is able to build trust, respect and commitment. This style works best when a leader is uncertain about best direction however, it does not make sense if employees are not competent. Pacesetting is a leadership style that expects excellence and self-direction. The leader is obsessive about doing things better and faster, and expects the same of everyone around

While the secretary supports the office as a whole, the executive assistant supports only a company executive or director. If it is a small company, the executive assistant supports all of the executives. While the executive assistant is privy to the most confidential information

There are four main leadership styles, the first being Autocratic style which the manager retains as much control and decision making authority as possible, the manager does not give employees any input or consultation. The next is Bureaucratic which is where the manager manages ‘by the book’ which is where everything must be completed according to procedure and protocol. Mangers using this style will only consult with those above them in the chain of command. They simple enforce the rules of the workplace. The next style of leadership is Laissez-Faire which is also known as the ‘hands off’ approach to management. The manager usually provides little or no direction and give employees as much freedom as possible. All power is given to employees and they are to dictate their own work ethics. The last leadership style is the Democratic style which is also known as the participative style and this is where employees are encouraged to be a part of the decision making process. The democratic manager keeps their employees informed about everything that affects

Some management styles may be best for the situation and some may not be. Therefore, awareness on different types of management styles will help the managers to handle different situations the optimal way. Different management styles are capable of handling different situations and solving different problems. Therefore, a manager should be a dynamic person, who has insight into many types of management styles such as:

Additional styles are consultative and paternalistic. On the contrary to democratic style, managers make decisions after having consulted. Efficient management does both – points out the most viable suggestions and raises motivation of the team. Paternalistic style means that kind of relationship similar to the way a father fosters his children. As a leading role of the management, this style has a lot in common with autocratic style. However, managers pay more attention to what their subordinates need and strive for. They tend to give detailed explanation of matters, care about the feedback they receive, form the direction of actions employees could follow, forge necessary qualities and qualifications, and make common decisions (“Leadership,”

When using an authoritarian leadership style, close adherence to regulations and policies are the fundamentals of this leadership style. Workers are held to a specific standard, and the relationship is purely professional. In a democratic leadership style, the decision-making ability is shared. The superintendent relies on feedback from the foremen when making decisions.

The impact of the dependent style can have an impact on my management style. The ability to manage individuals and be an effective leader in very important in today business world. Managers have to perform many roles in an organization and how they handle various situations will depend on their style of management. A management style is an overall method of leadership used by a manager. It is important to have management style to define who I am, because I have to have a strong management style in order

There are three generally accepted styles of leadership and management. The first of which is an authoritarian approach. This approach leaves little in the way of discussion and communication beyond what is dictated and mandated by the leader. The second style is participatory where a democratic approach that involves discussion and teamwork is embraced. The final leadership style is referred to as the laissez faire approach. The laissez faire leadership style is a very hands-off scenario where leadership only becomes engaged when they are engaged to do so by the followers. ("Lewin’s Styles,"

Leadership style is defined as a leader’s style of providing direction, implementing plans and motivating people. In the Business World, there are all types of leaders that are exhibited in the political, business and other fields. Leaders should be able to distinguish which is important “being the boss” or “being liked”. Managing people can sometimes make you feel like you are running a zoo but taming the inner animal by learning about your leadership is the key to becoming an effective manager.

There is authoritarian management, this is where a manager takes care of all managing and decides on policies. The managers that use this management style rely on their staff to follow the management guidelines that were made by senior management. The staff knows what needs to be done and how they should do it (MBA online Program, 2013). There is also democratic management, this is where there is flexibility for the staff. The staff can have a sense of ownership because they are also involved in decision making. Paternalistic management is where the boss is there acting like the father figure and is trying to make the staff enjoy their work environment and make them happy. According to MBA online Program  (2013), “an Autocratic Management style exists when the manager makes unilateral decisions with little or no regard for employees” (7.). Finally there is Laissez-faire management; this is where the staff can manage areas on their own. This type of management style, works great for creative, professional, and motivated employees (MBA online Program, 2013).

When a mass of people, organisation, country or a whole world gets influenced by leadership quality of a person, then the person is said to be a leader. Leader is the one who guides and shapes the actions and opinions of others. Leader is one who represents the views and feelings of others or the one is able to change the way others think. Successful leaders are those who have their own leadership qualities and effective management principles and at least have a determination to change something for the sake of people. Management styles vary from one leader to another. Two common examples of management styles can be taken as autocratic and democratic.

First, I will be explaining my management style. Even after discussing management styles, I am still not sure where I fall. I took several quizzes, but would get a different answer each time. Personally, I believe I usually settle between the authoritative and pacesetting management styles. I have high standards, but I am open to letting others find better way to complete a task. If they fail, I will take over and do the task myself, or let someone I find more knowledgable do it. I usually work by persuasion, and always provide feedback when I feel something could improve or if there is an easier way to complete a task.

The first leadership style that I chose is the Team Leadership. I think that team leadership is a great style to use for management because everything is stronger when it is pulled together. Strong team leaders can motivate and guide your business teams so they complete tasks and make decisions effectively. Whether the team chooses its leader or you appoint one, no single leadership approach guarantees success. A team that does well with a strong leader may fail under the guidance of someone with a less effective leadership style( http://smallbusiness.chron.com/pros-cons-team-leadership-styles-62320.html ). This is like the example of Navy Seal B.U.D.S. training. The Seal’s are broken down into different team for small boats based on size.

Executive assistants are natural-born leaders. They are the trusted confidant of their executive and are notably the most versatile role in the office. Executive assistants are productivity Picassos, painting fluid implementation on what was previously a white canvas, and always, with little direction. They cope with anything thrown at them, consistently with composure. Ultimately, they lay the brick for the foundation of many components of the business in which they serve. They are a perfect candidate as a member of the leadership team, because they already know the ins-and-outs of the business and are expert decision makers. Long ago was the time when EAs were just merely gate-keepers. EAs have broken into a dynamic role, helping guide functionality

Employees may have more than one administrator as there are numerous supervisors at the same level inside the association which may ruin the development of the association as chiefs have a wide traverse of control.