Explain What Role Dose Risk Plays In Dentistry

Another issue of controversy is the safety of the chemicals used to fluoridate water. The most commonly used additives are silicofluorides, not the fluoride salts used in dental products (such as sodium fluoride and stannous fluoride). Silicofluorides are one of the by-products from the manufacture of phosphate fertilizers. The toxicity database on silicofluorides is sparse and questions have been raised about the assumption that they completely dissociate in water and, therefore, have toxicity similar to the fluoride salts tested in laboratory studies and used in consumer products (Coplan and Masters 2001). It also has been maintained that, because of individual variations in exposure to fluoride, it is difficult to ensure that the right individual dose to protect against dental caries is provided through large-scale water fluoridation. In addition, a body of information has developed that indicates the major anticaries benefit of fluoride is topical and not systemic (Zero et al. 1992; Rölla and Ekstrand 1996; Featherstone 1999; Limeback 1999a; Clarkson and McLoughlin 2000; CDC 2001; Fejerskov

Fluoride in drinking water has been a hot topic in the past decade. Some communities are all for it and some are completely against it. With such a range of opinions on the matter some organizations have took it upon themselves to present the pros and cons of the fluoride to the public so they can make informed decisions. Often times these surveys are bias to one side or the other, so I shall be giving information on both sides of the issue, the future outlook, and my personal opinion in order to help inform you to decide on your own.

Fluoridation of group drinking water is a main consideration in charge of the decrease in dental caries (tooth rot) . The historical backdrop of water fluoridation is a great case of clinical perception prompting epidemiologic examination and group based general wellbeing intercession. Albeit other fluoride-containing items are accessible, water fluoridation remains the most fair and practical strategy for conveying fluoride to all individuals from most groups, paying little respect to age, instructive achievement, or wage level.

According to World Health Organization data obtained from a study on 12 year old’s levels of tooth decay, fluoride has had very little effect, if any at all, on tooth decay. Countries such as Japan, Italy, and Iceland, who are non-fluoridated countries, actually have about the same level of tooth decay decrease as countries that have fluoridated water. Fluoride is considered a drug, according to the FDA, which means that it is a medical treatment. Medical treatments are not to be given unless the patient agrees to the treatment, therefore, placing fluoride into the public water supply violates informed consent seeing as how citizens are not given the opportunity to vote on the matter. Even if people could vote on the situation, not all people are going to agree with and since it is considered a drug, it

In those case the person have to control the levels of fluorides because in most cases the levels are greater than FDA/CDC recommend but most people don't treat their water to lower the amount of fluoridation. In the case cities water systems fluoridation is monitored and adjusted to meet certain standards, low enough not to cause harm yet high enough to aid in preventing tooth decay. Tooth decay is a big health problem if not controlled. Which one the the water supply systems did you read about that was causing the health

The current data suggests that water fluoridation disproportionately harms low-income and minority communities. In 2005, the Centers for Disease Control released the results of a national survey of dental fluorosis, which was conducted between 1999 and 2002. According to the results, in the U.S., African American children have significantly higher rates of dental fluorosis.2 Same observation has been made in other studies as well. Another study conduced in Indianapolis, Indiana, shows that “the prevalence of dental fluorosis in African American children (80.1%) was significantly higher than in Whites (62.5%). 3

Research has been showed that such an improvement is due to many factors that combined together. One of these factors is systemic water fluoridation, which has been announced to have a substantial impact on children dental health, alongside with topical fluoride that can be found in mouthwash, toothpaste, and fluoride supplements. In addition to better nutrition, rising standards of living, and better access to dental care 76.

For over 60 years, Americans have been inundated with propaganda proclaiming the benefits of artificially fluoridating the public’s drinking water to prevent tooth decay. I do not use the term “propaganda” lightly. In fact the “father” of modern propaganda, nephew of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays was brought in to sell spiking America’s public water supply with fluoride (Pilger). This was critical to protect the American Aluminum Company (ALCOA), the world’s largest aluminum producer, from litigation from their workers who were exposed to toxic levels of sodium fluoride. Fluoride in the public water supply is a detriment to the health of Americans and provides no positive benefits while presenting great risk. Fluoridated water is poison, it is proven to decrease IQ, and it is medicating the public with an FDA classified tranquilizer without the informed consent of the citizens.

According to the CDC, fluoridated community water has been hailed as one of the top ten public health achievements of the last century11. The April 2000 edition of the Journal of Dental Research stated the use of fluoride was primarily responsible for savings of about $40 billion in oral health care from 1960 to 200019. In Arkansas, the current cost for community water fluoridation is approximately 50 cents per person, per annum, which is a fraction of the cost for repairing one cavity20. For every dollar spent in fluoridation, 48 dollars are saved in avoidance of treatment21.

For the past seventy years, fluoridated drinking water has provided people across the country daily dental care, straight from the tap. Named one of the ten great public health achievements of the 20th century by the CDC, fluoridated water substantially reduces tooth decay, making fewer emergency dentist visits as easy as sipping a cup of good old fashioned H2O. Yet dangerous misinformation about fluoridated water persists. As Thomasville, High Point, Lexington and Denton’s most trusted source for dental care, you know Smith Bundy Fisher DDS PA always offers reliable oral health information you can count on. Here, they debunk harmful myths about fluoridated water.

Today I will be writing about the ever going argument of “Is fluoridated water better for your health?” Many people have said that it is in fact the opposite but i intend to change their opinion with my research project. If you don't know what water fluoridation is, it is the adjustment of fluoride to the recommended level for preventing tooth decay.

In the mid-1940s, Grand Rapids, Michigan began to control the amount of fluoride in the city’s water system in an attempt to improve the dental health of its citizens. Since that time, the adjustment of fluoride levels in the public water supply has been implemented throughout the United States and in other countries. This practice, known as community water fluoridation, has sparked ethical debates in a number of countries where it is currently not employed. Some governments have concluded that fluoridating public water is unethical while others find it a necessary community service (G. Pizzo, Piscopo, I. Pizzo, & Giuliana, 2007). The topic remains controversial because it has also been a topic of debate among dentists and other health care

It is important for everyone to take good care of their teeth and the extent to which they are taken care of can sometimes even determine what overall condition they are in. This makes sense because a person that frequently skips brushing their teeth will most likely have more cavities than a person that brushes their teeth daily, but it can also depend on the things a person is eating or drinking as well. In this paper, I will discuss the ways that fluoridation of drinking water affects our health in ways such as theories, developments, and the role that it plays in society.

iii. The Story of Fluoridation states, “In 1945, Grand Rapids became the first city in the world to fluoridate its drinking water” after it was discovered that fluoride could help reduce the rate of tooth decay and cavities. This program would be the first step in fluoridating most of America 's tap water.

Fluoride, an essential component for human health, is obtained mostly by drinking water but it becomes toxic when its concentration exceeds the permissible limit (Handa 1975; USPHS 1987; WHO 1984). A concentration of fluoride less than 0.6 mg/l may results in dental carries, while greater than 1.2 mg/l results in fluorosis (ISI 1983). Problem of excessive fluoride in groundwater was first highlighted by Short et al. (1937) in Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh and today more than 65 million people, including 6 million children, are affected by endemic fluorosis in 20 states of India as a result of consuming high fluoride water (Gupta et al. 2006) and Uttar Pradesh is one of those states (Jha et al. 2010).