Explain Why Alexander Wasn T Great Dbq

To start off, Alexander the Great was great because he was a military genius. In document B, it explains how he tricked Porus into thinking that he was going to attack when he was not. When Alexander actually attacks, Porus will not be prepared. Alexander the Great

First reason Alexander the Great was it so great because he lack concern for others. In the four major battles Alexander the Great and his soldiers fought a lot of enemy soldiers to conquer other rulers land. According to “Alexander Legacy” anestimate of enemy soldiers and civilians Alexander killed in the four major battles is around 100,000.

Was Alexander the Great really great? To earn the title great, he must have done something astounding. Alexander the Great had fulfilled many goals in his life which made him one of the world's most impactful leaders, resulting from his education, his amazing military training, which lead to his many strategic accomplishments, and through transforming the Greek culture. First, Alexander received education in science, geography, and literature by Aristotle. He also learned many military techniques. Second, Alexander accomplished what no others could, he conquered the Persian Empire in just 3 years, which stood for 2 centuries. Third, Alexander impacted the Greek culture and started a new age, the Hellenistic age, this was a time of peace when

The finale reason Alexander was great is because he was an inspiring leader. For example, in document A, it shows all the places he conquered, this shows he’s an inspiring leader, because of what he could accomplish, which could be inspiring. Also, it shows how far he walked and how determined he was which could inspire somebody. Another example, is in document F, this shows how inspired Khushi is because of Alexander The Great, which could rub off on somebody else, and it tells us all the things Alexander did for him and how grateful he is, which is very inspiring.

Alexander should not have been called great, because of the many people he killed, and the land he

Alexander was a great leader because he was a inspiring leader to many later coming kings. According to paragraph 8 of the background essay “Julius Caesar wept in front of a Alexander statue because he had conquered so much in such little time”. This proves that even Caesar was inspired and awed by Alexander. According to document E Marcus Macrinus had Alexander sewn into his clothing for 540 years. Alexander really had to inspire Marcus to make him put Alexanders face on his clothes for 540 years. Alexander really inspired

First of all, Alexander was great because of his intelligence. Alexander showed intelligence when he was about to go to battle with Porus, but he made a choice to turn around with his troops and go the other way so it would confuse Porus. In document B it says this when it says “When Alexander saw this, he decided to move his troops in all different directions so

Those who see Alexander in a negative manner obviously have quite strong opinions about it. They see him as more of a madman than the most powerful leader. It is easy to see where they get their assumptions from for they look at the bloodshed part of Alexander’s reign. Instead of focusing on the rare ability he had to conquer so

Alexander was great because he protected his empire. In 334 BCE Alexander had his first battle at Granicus River. 11 years later Alexander and his army fought in 5 major battles and found about 11 towns (Document A). While on his conquest for 11 years no one from any other country was able to take his empire away from him. Armies from other countries attempted to fight for a piece of land, but failed miserably. Alexander fought through 5 major battles in three different continents and still won. Since Alexander and his troops marched through the continents the basic necessities such as food and water was hard to find. Alexander’s troops couldn’t carry tons of weight. Finding water and food in a new land is very dangerous and exposes the fleet to attacks. Alexander’s troop also can't carry heavy duty tents so shelter would be very limited, this could be very terrible because the horrendous

Alexander the Great did many things and conquered many empires. Doc E tells many useful facts to know him such as: it only took 11 years for Alexander to build his empire. The life expectancy for humans in America 2016 was 71. So can you imagine using about 1/7 of you life to build an empire that big? Now that is progress. In doc E it also states that he conquered 70 cities and claimed them making the Roman Empire (at its greatest) 2,200,000 square miles. Somewhere on that journey the army had to cross a desert. (doc d) The Legend of the Helmet shows how he encouraged people in strange ways. Doc d quotes “in full view of his troops, poured the water on the ground. So extraordinary was the effect of this action that the water wasted by Alexander was as good as a drink for every man in the army.” This quote is important because this shows what kind of leader Alexander was and how Alexander acted. He was always loyal to his troops but listened to his religion too.. Like in doc d The Legend of the Hat Band, he believed by killing the person with the kings band he believed that he would gain talent, and many believed that he did. Now that you know what he was like, you can start judging

The definition of great is above average, but Alexander seems average to me.Therefore, I don’t think that Alexander deserves the title of “The Great”. To be great one must be a leader, trustworthy, honest, kind, and brave. Alexander III was none of these things. Alexander was a murderer, criminal, and he enslaved women and children.

Why do people see Alexander see him as not so great? Well one reason can be that he did sell people into slavery. He had sold many people into slavery because they went against his rule. Also, Alexander wanted to be a god. He wanted many people to worship him because he was great enough to be a god. In India, he killed Brahmins and Indians who resisted his rule. He sometimes killed them if they said he was ruling the wrong way. So Alexander did have a bad side at

Alexander the Great was a ruthless villain because he mistreated many people. He mistreated people by selling 30,000 of them as slaves, and and killing 6,000 people. I think this is uncalled for and in unnecessary. When you show that much anger and frustration for no reason, you will be remembered in a negative way. This proves my point on Alexander the Great

Alexander had extreme ambitions of greatness, he was able to accomplish more in his short life than most men did throughout their entire lives (“Lined with Gold”). By always striving to achieve more, Alexander gained many different peoples trust building a very vast and powerful empire. Being able to achieve many things for your empire shows that you care about the way your people live, this shows heroism because you think about your people before your mind wanders to yourself! “Some people would say… that Alexander was a villain because he only cared about himself succeeding and would do anything to make it happen. In their minds Alexander had a cocky mindset and was abusive to many of his advisors (“Alexander the Great: Hero or Villain?”). It was also believed that Alexander never took the time to rebuild the lands he conquered (Maxwell 3). This could be interpreted that Alexander didn’t give a care in the world about what went on as long as he was conquering others. Overall, what someone does can be interpreted in many different

Alexander III of Macedon or commonly known as Alexander the Great was the conqueror and king of the Persian Empire which is the Ancient Greek kingdom of Macedon. He was born on the 20/21st July 356 BC in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia. While in reign from 336 to 323 B.C, he united the Greek city-states and led the Corinthian League. He also became the king of Persia, Babylon and Asia as well as created Macedonian colonies in the region and was a member of the argead dynasty. Unfortunately he died around the 10/11th June 323 BC in Babylon at 32 years of age which was classified as middle aged back then.