Explain Why All Cities Should Have A Public Dog Park

I believe that a dog park would be an excellent idea for Muscatine, Iowa. Not only would a park benefit the dogs but it would benefit the owners. A dog park would help in raising and caring for the dog. Dogs should be able to play and be free in a space that they will be safe. Not everyone has the space available at their homes. Some people live in apartments that don't have the yard space needed to let the dog run around. Expecially with bigger dogs. They need a lot of room. I can understand why people would be opposed to the idea though. There's always a chance of a dog harming another animal or human. Dogs can carry diseases, fleas, lice, and other harmful things that can be transfered to humans and animals. But if you let yourself

Safer conditions for everyone. It is important we keep pets healthy both physically and mentally, a dog park can do both. Dogs need exercise to stay healthy, in the area 68% of residents live in rental units an a quarter of those are apartments, can you imagine living your whole life in a small apartment only going out once or twice a day? Yet we expect our dogs to live like that. When animals do not get the proper exercise it can cause a starin on them mentaly resuluting in behavioral issues including barking and bitting acordigng to the ASPCA, this can put people at risk even young children. A reports states that dog-bites went down 36,000 per year in new york after allowing off-leash parks, That was potintaily 36,000 law suits right there that are elimantaed just by alowing dogs to get proper exercise. Exercise also reduces barking making it a more peasent

I do believe it would be best for everyones sake if the dog park was built. Clearly, the passage stated in benefit to the dog park being built, "Bad behaior caused by dogs being lonely or poorly exercised is partly responsible for the 2 million pet dogs that end up at U.S. animal shelters every year." The prevention of putting an animal in a shelter could possibly avoid lawsuits from the animal attacking a person.

The need Muscatine, Iowa has for a dog park is a difficult topic. Dog owners have lamented over the fact that there is no safe and legal area for them to allow their dogs to exercise in. In oppistion non-dog owners feel that the construction of a dog park would hamper their ability to peacefully live their life. Whilst there are difficulties to building a dog park for the community, I believe the pros out weigh the cons.

Statistics show that 37% of Americans who own dogs often look for a dog park when choosing a place to live. On the other hand, some people believe that a dog park would not be a good idea for the city, and that it would just be a burden for taxpayers and a lawsuit waiting to happen. Some cities require a owner to obtain and display permits to have a dog off-leash at the dog park, but most people do not do so. Most cities rely on the people respecting the parks' rules. Which means if a dog attacks another dog or person, the victim can legally sue the owner and the city for not enforcing the law. That's why I think everyone should obey the parks' rules or the community should better plan a park so everything goes smooth for everyone. Some people also believe it would be a burden by increasing the traffic and the noise in the area. But think about it for your dog, he or she would be much happier to have a fun day at the dog park. With all that said, I think it's a great idea to bring a dog park to Muscatine, IA. Let's do it for the dogs so we can all be a happy family at the end of the

Dog parks in the city would help dogs get daily excercise and it would help them get in shape and it would also help to calm them down beacuse it is proven that dogs that get daiy ecercise tends to be more playful,less noisy,and isin't mean. but the cost of building a dog park would cost up to 70,000$ just for the fence thats not including a building permit and all the work. Most dogs would benifit from having a local dog park but the federal cost of funding a dog park would be outrageous even though it was proven dogs that get daily excercise tends to be more happy and less viceous. There was approximitly 40,000 dog bites a year from New York after they received a dog park the number dirasticly dropped to 4,000 a year. Accordin to the ASPCA

Some believe, dog owners shouldnt pressure the city to provide the community with a dog park, because its your problem not having the space and the place to walk your dog. But on the other hand, having a dog park is great for the dogs. Its physically and mentally good for the dogs according to the ASPCA.

I am a proponent of dog parks. It is my belief that these parks are a wonderful addition to any community. There are many benefits to having such parks, not just for the animals, but for us as well.

A vast majority of citizens in one city own dogs. Some citizens would prefer having a dog park for there dogs, but some do not think it would be the best idea for the community. Dogs can get out of control, attack others, put other dogs at risk and so for. Dogs can also get out and communicate with each other and have the best behavior. People have different opinions on this situation and i think adding a dog park in cities would be an excelant idea.

I belive that a dog park is essential for a large community. They have so many positive things to bring to the table. There are some negative things, but as I see it the good out weighs the bad. Hopefully my opinion can persuade the people against it.

In my opinion I think that cities should have dog parks. I chose this statement not only because I love dogs, but for other reasons as well. Here are three reasons why I think cities should have dog parks.

Exercise and socializing are very important for dogs. A Lack of physical exersise can lead to a number of physical and mental health problems including becoming aggressive. A dog that is unable to socialize can not learn how to properly interact with other animals and people. Making the risk for dog bites higher. It has been proven that when a dog park was opened

When it comes to this issue both sides of the argument are well considerd in my perception. Being a very indecisive person it takes me alot of mental effort to figure out what it is that i want, That beig said the most reason solution comes down to data and statistics. Atleast in my opinion the side with the most beneficial data is the one that triumphs the opposing side; in response i suppose the benefit of a dog park can be a positive thing and a negative entity depending on the mental perspective that it inflicts on other individiual's and the economy.

Dog parks are should be a part of neighborhoods. Some people believe that their dogs should have a play to excerise, play, and interact with other dogs. whereas other people believe that dog park would be a burnden.

First of all I know the problem of living in a city and having a dog. There are many disadvantages for the dog and the owner. When can I go out with him and play with him? Where can I go without breaking the law of off-leashing my dog? I can say there are many positive things of building dog parks in cities. For example, if you have a dog park you can go there and off-leash your dog and play with him or her. The dog has enought space to run and to jump. This is one of the main problems for bigger dogs, who live in cities. Often the owners don’t know that a big dog