Explain Why Are Some Leaders More Effective Than Others

Leadership comes in all types of styles. No two Army leaders will have the same style. There is a saying that goes around our ranks today, “Your leadership traits strongly reflect your past leadership.” Meaning that you will develop traits and habits that you have seen in your past leadership. Whether they are good or bad, you will not notice them yourself until you think about what you are doing or saying. It takes time to develop as a leader, and you will know when you find your style that works for you and you’re Soldiers.

At the end of the day, a true leader “in the army will do these three things live by the army core values, know the warrior ethos, and lead by example”-MSI textbook. Leaders both in and out of the army are held to a higher standard holding themselves in a professional manner at all times. The success of the group is attributed to the leadership styles and core values instilled in the solider to do his job effectively. General Eisenhower once

As a commissioned officer in the United State Military, you must me a leader. There are those who are born leaders, who instinctively step up to the task with a will and desire to aid and assist, and there are those who are chosen to be leaders. As a commissioned officer it is your job to both rise to the occasion in spur of the moment brilliance as well as fulfill your role as the selected role model. As former four-star General Colin Powell said, “Leadership is solving problems. The day soldiers stop bringing you their problems is the day you have stopped leading them. They have either lost confidence that you can help or concluded you do not care. Either case is a failure of leadership.” Your responsibility as a leader is to constantly have confidence

The definition of leadership is symbolized by the diversified type of leaders within an organization engaging the trust of their subordinates. The American Soldier fully support the efforts and leadership made by all men and women entrusted with this tremendous level of responsibility; our current war fighter generation finds itself making significant changes to the way we lead within our ranks as a fighting force and an advocate of peace. “Why Write a Leadership Philosophy” by Gerald F. Sewell says, “When I took over as a military sub-community executive officer in the early 1990’s, I failed to share my leadership philosophy with my community staff; consequently, many did not know what to expect. I became aware later that several civilian members on my staff were afraid of me and did not know if they should approach me”. From this quote, you can almost draw a conclusion that our line of work is one that requires transparency and absolute solid

The first leadership role that influences performance of soldiers is the drive that leaders have. This can be in the form of incredible achievements, ambition as it impels leaders to set hard tasks and challenges for themselves and their teams, high energy to achieve fuelled drive, initiative meaning leaders are proactive in terms of decision making and taking action and last but not least tenacity. A good example of how this trait is portrayed with emphasis on how General Tommy Franks a self-confident artillery man spent one year fashioning an elaborate plan to invade and conquer Iraq’s war troops (Rigon, 2012). The detailed plan was followed to the letter, and despite heavy bloodshed, desired results were achieved. From the time this General enrolled in the Army in 1965, to his period of retirement in 2003, he

I spent a number of years at 1st Battalion, 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne), based in Stuttgart, Germany. I grew up in the unit, learning as I went and increasing my responsibilities as I gained rank. Sometimes I had a Soldier or two for whom I was responsible. I mentored them, guided their activities, and pushed them to become better leaders. Then there were other periods where I wasn’t necessarily responsible for troops. My leadership development took the form of mission management and initiative, unit training, or independent project development. I also began to notice the importance of organizational leadership and perspective. By the time I left the unit as a Staff Sergeant, having also undergone significant personal growth and maturing, I came to see leadership not so much as a set of tools to get things done, but an attitude or a mindset that must maintain.

The United States Army is a thriving military force that has safeguarded America’s homeland for over 241 years and continues the fight for everlasting freedom. The Army’s success lies in its ability to adapt but most importantly the Army’s triumph lies within Soldiers who are groomed into leaders. In my opinion, leaders are expected to uphold the standards and become a source of motivation that followers gravitate towards. The dictionary definition of leadership is simply the action of leading a group of people but everybody has their own method in doing so. In this short paper, I will provide my leadership philosophy and establish my standpoint as an Army leader.

I am a Noncommissioned Officer, a leader and a teacher to other Soldiers in the Army, in which I have come to be from the lowest rank of Private when I first joined the military. I have seen many different leadership styles and learned to adapt some of those traits to develop my own. Some of these leaders were effective using several approaches, becoming friends with their subordinates, others were strict and by the book, other ones used mass punishment to enforce authority and obedience, while others saw their position as a benefit only for their own to do as little as possible.

I originally had a two year commit and then was recalled off Inactive Ready Reserve for Desert Storm after I had been out for a year. However, to this day that brief time continues to have an impact on who I am in many facets of my life. The resocialization was intense. The military is a coercive organization. What is acceptable in civilian life is not acceptable in military life. Most all deviant behavior is corrected with formal sanctions. Conforming is mandatory, expected and is the social norm. The leadership is style is almost always as of an authoritarian and instrumental leader and very rarely is an expressive leadership style shown. It is typically referred out to a chaplain or other outlet so as to keep the structure, discipline and separation of leader and subordinate clear and distinct. When one promotes within the military added responsibility and leadership is granted. For me the role of leader was new as previously I had learned through experience to conform to group norms to quickly fit in and rarely assumed a leadership role. However, in the military they want leaders. They promote from within and the roles are given in increments and added upon your successes. I quickly found I loved being in charge and could quickly and easily motivate people in a positive manner through setting examples and explaining the goals instead of just demanding. That experience showed me that I could combine being an instrumental leader in setting goals and an expressive leader in understanding the needs of individuals I have spent the time to come to know and connect with. Using that knowledge and information to inspire groups and individuals to meet goals and how those goals help advance the group and individual. Since leaving the military every job I have had has lead me into a management role even if I start at the bottom rung of the ladder I quickly become a leader. I believe most people naturally

My philosophy on Leadership is to always place Soldiers first. It has been my experience if Soldiers are taken care of and feel as if they are a part of team, where their opinion is valued as much as the next, then they will strive to accomplish the mission to the best of their ability. I personally value respect and the thoughtfulness of others and hold those twos values to the highest regard. A great leader and a caring leader will look past the rank and see someone for who they are and treat them as they themselves want to be treated.

One thing I take strongly about being a leader (manager) is confidence in my decision-making and my team’s ability to stand behind me. The military has taught me to think quickly on my feet, identify the situation, evaluate

There is a plethora of exemplary leadership examples depicted in the movie entitled We Were Soldiers Once. Mel Gibson was brilliant in his leading role as Lt. Colonel Hal Moore who led his brigade into battle in Vietnam by being and doing exactly what he expected of his troops. He led by example. He modeled the way. He also exemplified the same leadership qualities portrayed on the battlefield in his roles as father and husband. Not only did Moore signify leadership qualities in his roles, but he expressed his commitment to leadership at all levels of his battalion by delegating that responsibility to all

There are some principles of leadership according to the Army, 1983 which, if followed by a leaders knows what are but also what they do. First leaders have to get to know themselves which will seek self-improvement. In order to know themselves, they need to understand what is theirs, what they do and attributes. Seeking self-improvement it means continually strengthening of their characteristics and this can be achieved through self-study, reflection, and interaction with others. Secondly, they are technically capable, in other words as a leader, must know their job and have a solid familiarity with the tasks of the employees. Moreover when things go wrong, as they do not blame others but a right leader analyzes the situation and take corrective

Army leaders are dictated by and required to adhered to ADP 6-22 which outlines the attributes and competencies of leaders within the Army. ADP 6-22 states an Army leader is anybody who, by virtue of presumed role or assigned accountability, motivates and influences people to accomplish an organization’s goals. Leaders within the Army motivate people both inside and outside the chain of command to pursue actions, focus thinking, and make decisions for the overall well-being of the organization. According to the Army’s definition,

There have been many theories about leadership and its styles, based among the relationships between human beings in which one or more persons exert a degree of influence that can lead others to conquer a common goal. It doesn’t matter what they say about leadership what really matter is how you see yourself as a leader, what impact have you left in your men, is it positive? Is it negative? What is your commander’s opinion about you? Have you thought about that before? Many questions to answer, don’t they? As military leaders and guidance for soldiers, we must demonstrate: endurance of character, competence, commitment, courage, patriotism, honor, wisdom, justice, integrity, faith, charisma, high standards of communication, discernment, generosity, initiative, listening, passion, positive attitude, high standards for problem-decision making, responsibility, security, self-discipline, dedication to service, be open to criticism and continuous improvement and many more. No matter