Explain Why Gun Control Should Not Be In Effect

Gun Control should not be enacted, Gun Control Laws have been proven ineffective in other countries, The Second Amendment allows American Citizens the right to keep and bear arms, and Gun Control laws take power from American Citizens, granted to them in the Constitution. Gun Control Laws have been proven ineffective in other countries. Gun Control Laws take power from the people. The Second Amendment grants US Citizens the right to keep and bear arms. Gun control laws would not help the United States decrease gun

Gun control is a very controversial topic that has has a huge impact on the United States of America. One side believes that if guns were taken away as a whole, the country would see significantly less gun related crimes and death, while the other opposing side thinks that taking away guns is not only against the Second Amendment but would lead to an increase in crime and death because the government would take guns away from people who are legally registered to own and conceal guns. The ongoing debate will continue until the foreseeable future but their are plenty of reasons why more gun laws should be made. Taking away guns is not the answer, learning how to deal with gun violence is the key.

Gun control is a very big issue in the United States today. Many people don't agree with the gun control laws that they have today. Gun control laws only take guns away from law-abiding citizens. Many people have their own reasons for owning a gun. Why would the government want to make it harder for people to own a gun? People that own guns are not very likely to be attacked by criminals. Owning a handgun is one of the best ways of protection. The second amendment states "the right to bear arms" does this grant everyone a right to own a gun? Gun control laws have not been proven to do anything for citizens. Gun control laws just make it harder for a good guy to own a gun. Gun control laws are not a good idea.

Gun control has been a long debate to determine if it’s better to have stricter access to firearms. America is one of the few countries that has gun rights embedded in their constitution. But what makes the US exceptional is that it has the right to keep and bear arms, other countries do not provide the right to have access to them, but rather, the government is allowed to regulate its use. The right to bear arms has also been the cause of growing violence and crime, at least according to anti-gun lobbyists. Citizens should be aware the dangers and harm that guns present to society. Controlling the sale of firearms can greatly decrease the number of violent crimes.

Over two hundred years have passed since the founding fathers of the United States of America, had created the constitution, the very document that is viewed, by many, as the milestone for what has later become the most powerful country in the world, as well as, the beacon for democracy. Having derived its values from the simple, yet intrinsic principles of liberty, the constitution has played the role of a safeguard to always ensure the freedoms of the people of America will remain intact.

Have you ever wondered whether gun control is really for the best? The term “gun control” refers to laws or restrictions being placed on the ability to legally own or purchase a firearm. Gun control laws can vary by what they restrict. Some laws do not allow citizens to own a firearm under any circumstance. Some gun control laws allow citizens to have a firearm, but do not allow them to carry it outside. In general, whether there are gun control laws or not, there are certain types of firearms that, apart from certain people, most are not allowed to own. Americans should be allowed to possess firearms because they should be able to protect themselves, it is their right, and it will help keep people safer.

Crime and guns. The two seem to go hand in hand with one another. But are the two really associated? Do guns necessarily lead to crime? And if so do laws placing restrictions on firearm ownership and use stop the crime or protect the citizens? These are the questions many citizens and lawmakers are asking themselves when setting about to create gun control laws. The debate over gun control, however, is nothing new. In 1924, Presidential Candidate, Robert La Follete said, “our choice is not merely to support or oppose gun control but to decide who can own which guns under what conditions.” Clearly this debate still goes on today and is the very reason for the formation of gun control laws.

In the words of Si Robertson, “It ain’t gun control we need; it is sin control.” Gun Control is not the right approach in today’s society. The Preamble of the Constitution states that, “We the People of the United States...”, That includes every single human in this country, they deserve these Liberties. No one can tamper with the Justice that we obtain, also stated in the Pledge of Allegiance, “Liberty and Justice for all.”

“Any society that will give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both ”. This Benjamin Franklin quote is saying that we should not give up a constitutional right for security that won’t even come, and could be directed towards gun control. The circumstances and end results of the demonstration are the subject in this paper.

Gun control laws violate peoples right to self-defense and their feeling of safety. Police can not keep everyone safe. People feel safer having a gun because if they ever get into a situation where there are no police available and they need to use a gun for self-defense they'll be prepared. People use guns to protect their families and homes. While others say that guns are rarely used in self-defense when they haven't been in a situation where they needed a gun for protection. Guns are used for self-defense 2.5 million times a year. 64% of people feel safer with a gun in their home because they know if something happens they'll be protected. Taking away the right to bear arms affects the feeling of safety that 80% of women and 79% of men have.

Stephen Par. 3: Gun control is not an issue in the U.S. because of the seconded amendment. The seconded amendment states that we have the right to bear arms and is located in the bill of rights. The founding fathers of this country decided that the right to protect yourself is so important that they made it the seconded thing on the bill of rights, right after freedom of speech and life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. There for gun control shouldn't work because seconded amendment states we are aloud to have

Gun control should be in law because it would make people mad because people love their guns. Gun control laws do not deter crime; criminals deter crime. Gun control should not be in law because the second amendment says it protects individual gun ownership. A level of violent crime has been going down over the years so how can guns be the problem. That is why guns should not be in law.

Gun control is a serious topic that pops up in the news time and time again. One argument that is constantly made is, “If we were to ban semi-automatic rifles, we would then begin banning shotguns, then pistols, then knives.” This argument is deductive because it forms a claim that A leads to B, B leads to C, and so on. The premises of this argument is that if semi-automatic we banned. This is bad because it spawns a situation that is purely hypothetical. It makes the claim that something will occur if something that hasn’t happened already is in place. It’s a what if situation where it isn’t and can’t be proven until is occurs. Giving the opposition no way to argue against because they can’t prove that it won’t happen, but at the same time

Gun control in america has been a problem for many years now. We have 24 hours in a day which may seem like a lot but it’s not. Most people either go to work for half of the day or they are enrolled in school which leaves us with only a limited amount of time when we get home. Most likely the people who do buy guns does neither of these two things. Guns should not be allowed to american citizens because you never know what they are pondering about using the gun for. The best part about not allowing guns for citizens to use is that the rate of robborys, break ins, or even murders will decrease in america. This will make the jobs of police officers easier and more efficient. Guns should only be used for the army so they can protect our country.

Security remains critical and critical to peaceful coexisting amongst the people of a specific community. Security agencies ensure that everything runs typically as peace can engage in various activities in the different walks of life without fear or intimidation of any kind. The government upholds and remains responsible for the security of its people. This lead to the establishment of relevant law enforcement agencies such as security forces for example police unit. However, some of the governments are unable to provide the security needs to all the citizens hence some of the citizens acquire gun licensing to safeguard their interests. As gun control debate remains very controversial given the different perceptions, the paper seeks addresses the argument in support and against the gun control in the United States.