From an ethical standpoint, the burqa should not be banned. Any individual has the basic human right to be able to live his life and to express himself in any environment that is protected and equal. Historically, numerous groups of individuals have been suppressed by politics and judgement. This is the 21st century and as a society should be progressing forward and not backward. As a society, people should all challenge any status quo that infringes the entitlements of others. The utter fact that the burqa has been banned in certain areas around the world, advocates that certain regions clearly perceive the burqa to be a threat to public protection. Islamophobia or Islam hate as some people prefer to identify it, is a cultivating trend, specifically
There has been debates about whether the Islamic face veil should be banned in countries. The arguments that governments of countries that have banned the Muslim face veil (France, Syria, Netherlands, Spain, and Belgium) argue that the full-face veil is oppressive, degrading towards women, and goes against values of each country. However, many Muslim women believe otherwise and strongly disagree with the banning of the veil. I strongly believe that the Islamic face veil should not be banned because it is a complete violation of religious and expressive freedom and forces them to conform to an alternative culture.
The anticipated law, whose purpose is to ban the use of the burqa and veil, finally took place in France. The ban started within school, and expanded into a restriction within the entire country. France drew international attention, questions, and opinions on the justification of this new law. Even though France’s main response to their justification of the ban is to preserve the French culture, the law also positively addresses other problems such as: religious freedom, public safety, and women’s rights.
Politicians in Quebec have passed a controversial religious neutrality bill which would require people receiving and giving services to expose their faces and could mean that the Muslim niqab or burqa could be banned in public.
The burqa should be banned because it can cover up some people’s abuse incidents. Domestic violence has been reported from eighty-five to ninety percent for women that do not wear their burqa out in public. Most of the women who wear their burqa out in public are forced to by their husbands. Additionally, research indicated that wear of the burqa can lead skin problems, hearing loss, headaches, and other health issues to the women who wear them. The burqa has also been linked to depression, claustrophobia, and anxiety.
The banning of the burqa has become an issue in many places, including France. The French Parliament has decided it is time to ban the burqa in public. They believe is a sign of the subjugation and submission of women to males. Some believe it is used to cover up abuse and they also believe it is unfair to the public that citizens cannot see the women’s faces. However it is unfair for these women to be banned from wearing what they choose as just everyone else does.The banning of the burqa should not be allowed because it is discriminatory towards Muslim women and violates their freedom of religion and their freedom to express themselves.
What is oppression? By definition, it is an unjust exercise of authority by the government, limiting one’s liberty to do what one desires. The niqab is a cultural practice that predates Islam and not a religious obligation. Ironically though as it may seem, the niqab is not a sign of oppression. The Canadian ministry of immigration mentioned the hijab to be a ‘misrepresentation of the Canadians’, however the then prime minister, Stephen Harper mentions it to be a niqab- most probably to strong arm his case. A niqab and a hijab are two different items of covering oneself. The primary covers the entire body as well as the face only allowing for the eyes to be seen, whereas the latter is a medium to cover the head and face except the eyes. Many Muslim women find the two an appropriate way to mark and create their identity.
Women were forced to wear this dress to keep from committing impropriety but if men committed an act of impropriety nothing would be done about it like it would have been done with women. The claim was that the burka kept men from looking at a woman in an inappropriate way. Whereas, in reality it just kept women in the control of their male counterparts.
A nun can be covered from head to toe in order to devote herself to god. But when a Muslim woman does the same she is being oppressed. It may be argued that wearing a burqa benefits only a few and brings more harm than good to society. The real question is who does it harm? That should be the basis for banning this piece of clothing, not one based on fear or an arguably feeble argument that the women do not have a choice. To say that a ban on a specific item like this is undemocratic is an understatement. Following the French senate’s unanimous vote in favour of banning the burqa in late 2010, many European and western countries including Belgium and Spain have made the decision to take the
Based on the contending arguments above, there are several reasons why France has banned the Niqab, and thus, multiculturalism can be regarded as a failed policy: public safety, protection of rights and freedoms to others. To preserve public safety, it is extremely vital for a nation to be aware of who enters and exits a nation, and France clearly is keen on the need to visibly identify these individuals who “strike out” from the majority. For example, the repercussions for this ban have coerced Muslim women to completely alter their identities by giving up an element of their religion. Arguably speaking, the France government have stated that the removal of Niqabs will promote visibility and help combat any forms of danger, upcoming threats,
In conclusion, it feels like that only Europeans who are awkward seeing Muslim women wearing burqa. While Sarkozy disagrees that wearing a burqa is a sign of oppression to women. I think it should be known that Muslim women choose to wear burqa not because of obligations. I believe Concerning the European human rights laws, I believe women who choose to wear the burqa should not be prevented from their choice.
Prohibiting all people from Syria and Saudi Arabia coming to the United States is constitutional. There isn’t anything in the constitution saying it is wrong to do such a thing. The country does this usually for the purpose of the safety for country. The United States’ laws don’t apply to people who don’t live or are not citizens of the U.S. This situation has happened before in our history also. In the 1800s Congress passed a law limiting the immigration of Chinese laborers. This may seem wrong and racist, but according to the constitutional and our laws, it is allowed.
France should not have a ban on burkinis because that is taking away the freedom that every muslim woman should have. People of France should be coming together and stick up for these women even if they are not from the same religion. One day it could be you they targeting. And hopefully once something is said by the people then something will be done by the authority figures without police action being made. Because in today's day you never know what could happen if things are let go too far. Let muslim woman of France wear
When I was introduced to the topic of France’s ban on the veil, I disagreed with the law. I took a position based on my customs as an American citizen, which differs completely from those of France. International critics began to argue that France is violating what people call “Freedom of Religion,” which I agreed with at first. As a foreigner from America, I am accustomed to the American government’s definition of freedom of religion. Protected by the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise.” (Religious Freedom). You can express your religion in public, during church, mass, or religious meetings. So the presence of religious items such as the burqa's and veil do not disturb the people or government.
Here in the United States, some individuals think that by wearing a hijab you are you enforcing the belief that Muslim women are being forced to wear one despite the reason that some of these women wear it’s a sign of freedom. Therefore, it appears that to some women, the veil is unjust; while other women feel it is not unjust but a decision they made on their own in dedication to their religion. Still, for many women especially the ones in Western countries, they have no choice and for that reason alone, they are being made to wear a
Burqa bans are unlawfully stripping Muslim women of their right to follow and show their commitment to their religion. Many countries in the United Nations are beginning to put a nationwide ban on wearing burqas in public. This restricts Islamic women by giving them the choice to either defy their religion, or stay inside their house and not get anything done. Not only does this restrict daily activities, but it makes it challenging for islamic women to get a quality education. Overall, countries are putting a national ban on niqabs, forcing muslim women to betray their religious beliefs in order to perform simple activities.