Explain Why The Government Passed A Law Making Cigarettes

The ban would create many positive outcomes for example, The Health Factor for the public and including the environment. Smoking does really bad damage to everything, it’s a known fact to everyone. It affects everyone whether they’re a smoker or not, they can suffer just as much as the smoker. Some of the health effects of smoking are Cancer, Lung diseases, Heart disease, Poor blood circulation and unfortunately much more. All of Australia would be better off without smoking, if would help our children grow up properly without having to worry about cancer, or have simple life

If cigarettes suddenly became illegal the United States would suffer greatly. Not only would crime go up from people selling, buying and smoking but the tax from cigarettes would disappear causing one less source of income and an increase of crime. Of course, not all bad would come from this. The lifespan of the average citizen would increase and they would spend their money that has been freed up from lack of cigarettes and hopefully invest that into something that may improve their quality of life. Cigarettes becoming illegal would be far more effective at stopping smoking than ads such as those shown on television since people care more about what makes them feel good now and not about consequenses down the road.

One major issue of the Smoking In Public Ban is how will the economy react. Some people avoid businesses that allow people to smoke there because they don’t want to endanger themselves, their family, or both. Another pro for the ban in sense of the economy would be the odor of the cigarettes would be gone (Rutherford np).The ban will make businesses more family friendly which will add more money to the economy and cause more jobs be added to the workforce, internal improvements, and many other things that will strengthen our nation. The cons of the smoking in public in terms of the economy would be that it would encourage smokers to smoke less, which is good for the smokers but not so much for the economy because the tobacco industry would

Cigarettes are the leading cause of death in canada, and the most preventable. The topic of the ban of cigarettes has a deep history to consider, and there will always be both supporters and critics who continue to debate this topic.

One important criticism of cigarette tax is that due to the inelastic demand for its government would collect the sizable tax and achieve the minimal result in reducing consumption. Thus, to make the policy more effective and ethical governments could

The government in my country passed a law making cigarettes illegal would have numerous results. First, it would cause many people to lose their jobs because of the collapse of the cigarette factories. People who lose jobs will become poor and it will led to country has a lot of stress because the government need to spend great efforts to help these poor people. We all know that the size of cigarette factories is very large and cigarette factories are very influential because it can develop the local economy. Also, the government lets cigarette productions become illegal will cause the country’s economic development in a bad tendency due to cigarette factories are spread all over the

To a large extent, tobacco is considered deleterious. Firstly, tobacco is dangerous to people’s health. Not only direct smokers suffer from its chemical elements, but non-smokers who inhale the smoke are also severely affected. Smoking leads to addiction and increases the risk of fatal diseases such as lung cancer and heart attack. Secondly, smoking causes a significant loss of personal wealth and social benefits. Without spending money on the cigarette, people can save for other purposes and the government can convert the resources of manufacturing tobacco into

First, smoking cigarettes can cause health problems. In some severe cases, people sometimes have to get their teeth removed, and smoking can cause lung cancer and premature death. Studies show the death rate for smoking cigarettes has gone up throughout the years and people aren’t doing anything about it or given it the attention it needs. Not only can smoking be harmful to the smoker, but to the people around that are still breathing in the harmful chemicals.If cigarettes

To make the task happen they are trying to prevent people, particularly children and youth, from starting to use tobacco, help people quit using tobacco products, reduce the harmful effects caused by tobacco use. With the help of Legislative Branch the use of tobacco will be reduced tremendously. If the stop of tobacco at a young age it would be less likely for the child to smoke at an older age. It would also reduce the deaths of some users that use tobacco products. The banning of smoking in public places could also cut down on the urge of previous smokers wanting to smoke again. It could also cut the curiosity of little children wanting to try it. Some parents smoke with their kids and the car and they are inhaling the nicotine which is called secondhand smoke with is almost worse than first hand

Government could provide education about the dangers of smoking and also fund negative advertising in order to reduce demand for cigarettes. The revenue from tax imposing could be used (£100m). There is no guarantee of effectiveness of education and advertising in terms of reducing cigarette consumption, but the reduction in consumption would be larger with both tax + health campaign. Nevertheless, using the tax alone to lessen cigarette consumption may not be sufficient as smokers will always look for substitutes to their vice. The ban on smoking in public places has cut the external costs borne by non-smokers. The warnings on cigarette packets have changed some public perceptions. People are not the best judges of their own welfare, so the government intervenes to discourage the production and consumption of demerit goods (cigarettes in this case)-for example age limits for smoking. Advertising ban would be also useful, packaging shouldn’t be attractive for people, cigarettes should be hidden from the view of a consumer, warnings should be everywhere and more influencing. Also it would be good to ban cigarette consumption in pubs, restaurants, clubs and in cars with children. I think that increasing the price of cigarettes is a quite effective policy tool for reducing smoking participation and consumption among youth, young adults and persons of low socioeconomic status. Higher cigarette

If smoking doesn 't become illegal then people will continue to get lung cancer, get other health problems,and will continue to die.If it did become illegal then people would live healthier lives,have a longer life,and it would limit the amount kids smoke.

On the other hand, banning cigarette smoking would have an impact on economic or business. In 2013 the government collected $43.9 billion in tobacco tax revenue, and

Consequently, if the ban against smoking were to be put into action, there would be a great benefit; smokers would reduce their intake of cigarettes, meaning lowering risks of the defects of cigarettes. This is something many people want, and this is something that is necessary for the better of the people. Reduce the cigarettes. Reduce the chemical intake. Reduce the risks. It is as simple as that to reduce the risks of disease, and possibly saving some from the despair of disease.

It may be right to not banned smoking because of different reasons. Some smokers says that smoking help them to relax and having a cigarette helps them to be in a good mood. Also if smoking become banned, many people who works in cigarette making companies will lost their jobs according to “ What are some reasons why smoking shouldn’t be banned? ”. Nevertheless, smokers should realize the fact that smoking is very dangerous and it have many negative out comes. Likewise, smoking should be banned because of it harmful effects on the smokers health and no good can come from

There are debates around the world between people and government if smoking should be legalized. There are private organizations that protest against the government about how smoking can kill people and how dangerous it is as it could harm the young generation. Today, there are thousands young of teenager who smoke illegally. This could cause the future generation of teenager in danger by the bad influence of smoking.