Explain Why The Government Should Not Regulate Internet For Children

Living in the twenty first century we are all exposed to things we wish we were not or things our parents wish we had not been exposed to. Things like porn, cyberbullying, and invasion of privacy are a very real thing of today even more than it has been in the past years because our society is very technology based and as consumers we can get our hands on anything we desire as long as we have a connection to the internet. Does this mean that the federal government should be allowed to regulate information on the internet?

The internet has influenced teens to change their appearances and personality if they're not accepted by society. They do not allow each individual to be themselves. ¨While all may seem, well, overuse of the internet might be hidden behind deeper problems such as depression, anxiety, substance use or eating disorders, and learning or conduct problems¨ (Source 1). These disorders are influenced by others. If you are overweight, you're considered ¨fat¨ if you are underweight you might be considered a ¨stick¨ or ¨anorexic¨. Parents or any guardians at fault for these teens must be aware of how easy their own teen can be influenced and if they're dealing with a situation like the mentioned above.

Cerf did not state that the federal government was contributing to the well-being of the internet. The government is out of the picture. The internet is run by the private sector; therefore, the federal government is overstepping its bounds when it censors the internet. The private sector run internet “[has] generated an unprecedented explosion in commerce and creativity…nearly $8 trillion exchange hands each year through e-commerce…[Small and medium sized enterprises] that have an Internet presence generate more jobs" (Cerf). Society has reaped these immense economic benefits because of the internet, Cerf explains. Since the internet is run by the private sector, it is responsible for the immense benefits. However, if the government gets involved and censors content and restricts access to this truly amazing resource, that would restrict economic growth and have an immense negative impact on its citizens. Negatively affecting subjects is contrary to the principle of government. Government is created by people, for people, not by aristocrats for economic oppression of the people. In addition to censoring the internet themselves, the federal

"The internet is a vast expansion that has come into its own in the last couple decades. Internet culture is ever evolving, and information is available to virtually anyone with a click of a mouse. This invention has revolutionized the format of society, in both positive and negative aspects. The saying “you can find anything on the internet” is not far off. While many internet users only use the internet for basics, such as Google and Youtube, there is a secret and much darker place known as the ‘dark web’ that is filled with vile/illegal imagery, videos, and products. For this reason I believe that it is the duty of the federal government to regulate the internet, to an extent.

The online world is full of creeps and bad people, and kids just don't have the mental capacity to realize that yet. They can easily be swayed to share personal details, talk inappropriately, or plan to meet up with someone they find interesting. The consequences of these actions are not something they consider heavily.

"The government should have minimal interference with the internet, but complete neutrality would eventually become harmful. The internet is primarily a place for communication. As such, it does indeed make sense that the government should not interfere. However, the internet has evolved beyond communication and has grown into forms of business. The internet has become a setting like those of the physical world, with differences, of course.

Technology has had so many advances in the past decade. People are constantly using the internet for numerous things. Every person uses the internet and technology at least once in their lifetime. Since technology is constantly growing and advancing people find themselves using it more and more for everyday life. Now, adults are usually the ones using the internet, but young kids have found themselves using it more frequently as well. Whether it be a child who is using a phone for games, or a teenager who is using a phone for social media, the internet is always being used. Young kids also find themselves using the internet for several things including social media or texting. With young people using social media there can be a positive side, a negative side, and even changes in ones mind. Young people feed into social media and with this comes cyberbullying, insecurities, distraction, and no privacy.

The government controls much of what we can and can’t do, and also how and when we do it. For instance “taxes”, we all have to pay a certain amount to the government on a specific day where the IRS and their officials can determine how much we have to pay. The state control our cars through smog checks and how fast we can drive on the roads through tickets and fines. When the government has all of this control over us, should we give them more power? A power to control what is allowed to be posted or entered into one of the greatest informational tools in the history of mankind? The answer is simply no; they should not be allowed that power. In the wise words of Benjamin Franklin “those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one” If we give the government the power to censor the internet, we have lost the right for freedom of speech, expression, and other ability’s that we will lose having big brother hold our hand as we navigate through the massive index that is know as the internet.

These days the internet has become an essential part to living for almost everyone but one of the controversial topics that people bring up is that whether or not the government should regulate information on the internet. Both sides have valid points which form a reasonable argument. Some people would say that they need to because of the dangers lurking around in the cyber world but the reasons for why the government shouldn’t regulate the Internet outnumber the reasons for why they should. The federal government should not regulate or censor information on the internet because doing so violates the first amendment and citizen’s right to privacy, degrades the educational value of the web, prevents the promotion and facilitation of

There are many valid reasons for wanting to regulate the Internet content. Usually, the first reason that comes to mind is protecting children from improper content. This is primarily because of

Regulating the internet jeopardizes the rights of american’s. If congress is successful in passing the net neutralizing bill, it will allow government officials to limit what U.S. citizens are able to view and obtain. Social media has made a tremendous impact on today’s society, allowing people to retrieve information within minutes, as well as the ability to connect across states and countries. Facebook and Twitter give users a platform to share experiences, humorous quotes, and the ability to reach out for help during troubled times. If the Supreme Court grants America’s government full control of the internet and its content, sites such as Facebook and many others alike will be at risk of complete termination from the Web. It is highly unethical to force stipulations on citizens, or to attempt censoring what is U.S citizens birth right, which is freedom of speech.

The government has always been concerned with issues of national security. They have, in the past, kept information secret even from the American people because of perceived threat to the safety of the citizenry. With the advent of the internet and the massive amounts of information that can be found with a click of a few buttons, the issue has become whether or not this technology poses a severe threat to American security. At the same time, for some people the issue has been about free speech and the 1st Amendment to the Constitution. All these factors need to be taken into account when ultimately deciding a perspective on the issue of regulation of the internet. It is my contention that the government only needs to regulate the internet in cases where there might be a danger to national security or in terms of criminal behavior such as using the internet to share or download child pornography. If these two things are not clear and present, then the government should not be involved but should allow websites to continue without interference.

The Internet and social media are ever becoming more and more pervasive and prevalent in our society that when you walk on the street, you could easily find handfuls of people on their phones or laptops. As more and more of society comes in contact with the Internet, it becomes more influential but it also becomes more dangerous, especially to the younger children who are innocent and naive. The Internet, with its increasing amounts of social media platforms, is becoming a place that is negatively affecting the next generation both physically and mentally. It is dangerous in the sense that people are becoming addicted to it, it is increasing sexual behavior, it is marketing alcohol illegally to minors, and it is creating insecurities

We as people use the internet for wrong reasons but most teens who are hurt or insecure about themselves are putting our teens at risk.Nowadays teens who bully are more often the ones who doubt themselves so they make others feel the same way they feel on the inside.When you go to school and you like an inappropriate picture you could get suspended because if you like that post on school grounds they track your internet and they can block internet access for you.If you go to work and like a picture that might be offensive to someone in your office you might get fired because the post might be racist or it might show nudity.If you create an account under someone else's name then you could go to prison for fraud or plagiarism or you could get fired from work and have to find other jobs that you like.When the internet is being used for other reasons like bullying or catfishing someone then they might do something terrible and kill themselves and it would be the person the bullied them fault.Teens whose life is affected by the social media might fall into depression or begin to withdraw from society.As a teen, my life might be impacted by social media but it also is a distraction so when we put our phones away and start talking to each other face to face we might

Internet is a tool that connects people all around the world through social media. Clinicians working with adolescents have started to realize how important it was to start to understand the impact of electronic media, the internet, technology, all sort of things on the young people. It is very difficult to understand the old people that there has been a radical change in relationship even between young people because of these new tools. In the past children were really a time of emotional, secrecy, discretion and sometimes physically exuberance. Now young people tend to share their emotions, their thoughts, and their love and to expose it to the world through the internet. Internet has also led to a possibility to get in touch with anybody at any time. In the olden days, maybe school times was when you interacted, but then you went back home. Now at 11pm your phone starts to bleep because somebody has said something about you and suddenly your whole group of friends is starting to comment. Not only was this but adolescence a time where your sense of identity and also of sexually identity was developing. Nowadays anybody has access to material which 20-25 years ago was limited to paying adults. Therefore they are going to have to come to terms with images, which at a certain age, can be traumatic, but also lead sometimes to absolutely surprising expectations with regard to what is okay or not and how one should behave with one boyfriend or one girlfriend. Internet allows