Explain Why The South Lost The Civil War

Beginning as a battle of army versus army, the war became a conflict of society against society. In this kind of war, the ability to mobilize economic resources, the effectiveness of political leadership, and a society’s willingness to keep up the fight despite setbacks, are as crucial to the outcome as success or failure on the battlefields. Unfortunately for the Southern planters, by the spring of 1865, the South was exhausted, and on April 9, Lee surrendered to Grant at Appomattox Court House, effectively ending the war.

The statement “the North won the Civil War, but the South won Reconstruction.” can be interpreted many ways but for someone who has knowledge in the Civil War and Reconstruction and has studied this would know that is a true statement. As we all know, after four years and the over 700,000 dead the North was able to defeat the South. This should not have been a shocker for South because the North’s population more than doubled the South’s (2.2 million for the North versus the South’s 1 million), the technology for the North was way more advanced than the South’s. Also lastly the North were still able to trade goods which led them to having a surplus of money to buy more weapons to further aid the Union soldiers. In the end all these advantages were too much for the South who finally surrendered to the North on

A frequently, and sometimes hotly, discussed subject; the outcome of the American Civil War has fascinated historians for generations. Some argue that the North's economic advantages proved too much for the South, others that Southern strategy was faulty, offensive when it should have been defensive, and vice-versa. Internal division in the South is often referred to, and complaints made against Davis' somewhat makeshift, inexperienced, government. Doubts are sometimes raised over the commitment of Southerners to a cause many of them were half-hearted about. Many historians have argued that the South lost the will to fight long before defeat was inevitable. However, many of these criticisms could easily be applied to the North, had the

The population of the North is Seventy-One Percent compared to the South at Twenty-Nine Percent. The exact number for the South population is 9 million people while the North had 22 million people. The South had courage and motivation, due to the South defending at home; it made it easier to defend. The South did not have many materials to manufacture goods. The North, however, flourished in the manufacturing area due

Over the past hundred years, there has been some controversy over the idea of the reasons why the North/Union won the civil war. Some people may say the North won because they had better strategies, while others will say it was because of how big the Union was. But let it be heard from this point forward that the North won the civil war because the North had better resources, way more troops, won the Battle of Gettysburg, had better strategic and noble generals, and was always on the offensive during the war.

The statement “the North won the Civil War, but the South won Reconstruction.” is a true one to me. As we all know and learned is that after a long brutal war the Union (North) won the war and were able to bring the South back into the Union. There is no doubt that the North won or were going to win. Their population almost doubled the South and their technology was way more advanced than the South’s. Also lastly the North were still able to trade goods with others which led them to having a lot of money to buy more weapons. So in conclusion the Union were superior to the Confederates in every facet which led them to winning the War.

People believe several different reasons led to the South’s loss of the Civil War. However, I believe the main reasons were lack of sufficient assets in comparison to the North, low morale, and lack of strong military commanders. In the beginning of the Civil War, it may have been perceived as leaning in favor of the Confederates. However, it was very obvious in the second half of the war that the Union was in favor due to the incomparable counterparts.

Even though the North and South were two very distinctly different opposing forces during the Civil War, there were some things both sides had in common. The Civil War was primarily fought to abolish slavery after Abraham Lincoln was elected president, but there were core differences between the North and South that caused them to fight for or against slavery. Things like climate, social equality, and the economy, were major factors in determining whether a state was part of the Confederacy or the Union. When the Confederate states seceded they kept many traits from the Union, so there were still some similarities such as technology and political systems. Ultimately, the small amount of similarities between the two sides were overpowered by differences, and led to the North’s victory of the Civil War.

North was mostly family owned small farms while the south had major huge farms. In the south this was their way of life and the way they made profit. The north had many industries and made manufacturing their major profit. While the north seemed to be winning in many categories when it came to agricultural production and cotton the south had them beat.

The civil war was one the bloodiest American war in history. Both sides fought to protect what they thought was right. The north wanted the abolishment of slavery and create equality throughout the whole United States, the south though the opposite. Slavery was the main point of the war and why it started. Now since the north won the war and slavery was abolished over the U.S. there should be no monuments or symbols commemorating and glorifying people who fought for slavery. I have four points on how these statues and symbols should be removed.

The first difference between the North and the South is the population.The population of the North was about 22 million citizens. This means that there were plenty of people in those states just in case they were to start running out of militiamen. The population of the South was only about 9 million. This meant that if they were to get in a war with the Union they could possibly run out of men. They north nearly had 13 million more people than the North.One reason that the North has suh a bigger population was because the increasin in immagrant. ⅞ out all immigrants that came over to” America”went into the northern states.

There were many different reasons why the Civil War happened. One of them was economic differences. The northern side of the United States is known for their many immigrants, industries, and large buildings and companies. The South was known for agriculture, slaves, and cotton. The Northern side was against slavery, but the southern states were pro-slaves. It was understandable that the north was against it, because they didn’t need the slaves,

While the North also had slaves, they did not depend on them like the South did. The big difference being in the lack of plantation life in the North as the landscape wouldn’t allow for most major cash crops such as tobacco and rice to grow. This lead to the North preferring slaves with more technical skills and knowledge compared to the South preferring younger and stronger slaves to work in the fields. This resulted in the North having a lower number

Multiple factors contributed to the Confederacy losing the Civil War; a lack of resources for the South, a change in military strategy from the Southern leadership, the failures of the Confederate leadership to combat evolving Union aggressive military strategy, and prosecution of Union prisoners of war.

While both the North and the South had stable and confident economic systems, the North was much more industrialized and diversified and with a better transportation system they not only had the ability for mass production but also the means for speedy and