Explain Why We Should Be Involved In Helping People From Other Countries

The United States does not have an obligation to help poor countries. Many believe that the U.S. has a moral or ethical obligation to assist countries who need it. The United States is viewed as the police of the world, defender of democracy, and body of countries who it chooses to align with. When it is said that the U.S. has an “ethical obligation” the definition of those terms vary from person to person. No one is obligated to do anything, people feel obligated based on their own values and beliefs. Although the U.S. has a high gross

People could argue that since we are donating such a low percent of our GDP it would make sense for the US to increase aid levels. This would also be an argument for anyone that has certain religious beliefs. In the article A Call To Virtue, the author, Jeffrey Sachs shares one of the Pope’s various messages, “The urgent core of Francis’ message, which is the message of Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount, challenges this American idea by proclaiming that the path to happiness lies not solely or mainly through the defense of rights but through the exercise of virtues, most notably justice and charity.” In some religions people believe it is morally right to help through charity to find happiness. Some people also argue that foreign aid levels should decrease because of the economic crisis that the US is in. The United States current debt is over eighteen trillion dollars right now according to usdebtclock.org. People believe that by decreasing foreign aid levels it will take away some debt. If the levels were to maintain there would not be worry about creating more debt by increasing levels and the US would also not have to worry about pulling out and not giving enough. Another argument is that aid should be unconditional and should be given to whoever needs it in time of crisis no matter

States should increase foreign aid and why it is important to help the global cause.

Throughout history, many have debated about whether a wealthier country (developed) should help out a poor, less developed countries. “The U.S. disbursed $33.2 billion—$19 billion in economic assistance to 184 countries and $14.2 billion in military assistance to 142 countries.”(Forbes) Is it beneficial for a more developed nations to help out a less developed country?

Is America the world's policeman? Currently it would seem so, with the United States sending unheard of support to countless countries. America has been doing this task for about 60 years, more or less. America spends millions of dollars for the safety of countries that can't help themselves. Obviously America cannot afford to support so many countries and itself. Either it will run out of money or it will run out of men. Policing the world takes a lot of manpower. America is dragging down its own future. If America supports everyone else when they are down, will they do the same for America in the future? America, if it keeps wasting its resources to protect everyone else, will eventually fail (Snyder).

Ever had that one friend? The one who tries to help, but no matter how hard he tries, he just aggravates the situation. This friend, Steve, insists he is helping, and those around, too, would support that he is indeed helping. But Steve is actually worsening the circumstances. He is like countries who provide foreign aid to less developed countries. Foreign aid, defined as “the international transfer of capital, goods, or services from a country or international organization for the benefit of the recipient country or its population,” can be military, economic, or humanitarian (“Foreign”). It is often granted to less developed countries in order to evoke government reforms or to stimulate economic growth. However, foreign aid neither elicits government reform, nor does it consistently and reliably stimulate economic growth; therefore, the United States should discontinue providing foreign economic aid.

The United States is one of the industrialized countries that offer a small amount of aid. ( Fact Based)

Many American citizens disregard or are unaware of what is happening in other less developed countries. Some lack electricity, efficient amount of food for their families, and even running, clean water. Poverty is one of the major cause of death, mostly for young children due to sickness and their families can’t afford the help they need. There are ways America is helping the undeveloped countries to improve as many people's lives as possible. Although there is more suffering than there are helping, some are working everyday to help solve the problems many are suffering so badly from.

- There are people suffering and dying from lack of food, shelter and medical care.

Some people dont believe in foreign aid. Some people think that if they have more money and food, then they shouldn't have to "share". Peoplwe dont look at it as there is always someone who needs it and if you have "extra" than why not help another person. If anotheer place is in need they may contact a "richer" place.

With United States having great economic success, we can, and do, give more aid to other countries than anyone else. Yes, United States takes care of its own issues before helping the other countries, but helping others is in our culture to help other people or countries in need. From things like fund raisers for different needs around the world, or even just charities to help aid the people in need of it.

And in doing so, we've ushered in a new era of accountability and results”(Obama). To summarize Obama’s speech on global development is that the U.S needs to help countries in anguish to keep the global stability but only to some extent. The U.S should allocate its resource to help countries in despair because it has the ability to an in return gain benefits such as alliances.

This country clearly needs to advance in many places such as education or veteran healthcare before it helps others. Giving is good only when you can give. The United States should not give what it does not have. When this country is out of the eighteen trillion dollars in debt and has financial stability then it should rethink about helping countries in need. If the countries that we help would help us in a way this would not be such a bad idea, but Israel, Iraq, nor South Korea help us in any way. Sometimes a big brother needs help to. IF you do not help the hand that feeds you the hand might not be around for

Foreign Policy is a very complex and difficult subject to discuss with others. It is not a policy that you can make a rash decision over because it can hurt your country’s future if you’re not careful. Internationalism is vital for the United States’ it has developed unshakable alliances and we have benefited greatly when standing up and playing a leadership role on the international stage. From helping countries on the brink of an economic collapse to protecting countries from a potential nuclear attack. Internationalism is massively important to our economy and our influence around the world. Individuals like Donald Trump are threatening to withdraw troops from affairs we are currently involved in and reduce the amount of money we send. This will reduce our credibility as a nation and many countries across the world will feel betrayed.

The richer nations should help the poorer nations because they are able increase their foreign investments. By helping poor neighboring countries, the richer nations would be able to make the entire region an attractive location for investors and this in turn would bring more investments to the entire region. One example would be The Association of Southeast Asian Nations, commonly known as ASEAN. It is an organization of ten countries, including nations such as Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia located in Southeast Asia with the aims of accelerating economic growth and the promotion of regional peace along with social and cultural progress and using ASEAN as a platform for mediating between countries. This allowed the countries to conduct meetings, and the richer nations such as Singapore and Malaysia help poorer nations such as Laos, Vietnam and Cambodia through offering their expertise. An overall stability in the area has led to the increase in foreign direct investment, since there is investor's confidence in the area where it is socially and politically stable. Hence, richer nations can aid poorer countries since it would be a win-win situation for both countries and the richer nations would reap positive benefits such as accelerated economic growth from doing so.