Explain Why a Safe but Challenging Environment Is Important for Children and Young People

A course assignment presented to the College of Graduate Health Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Health Science Degree A. T. Still University

There are many sources of current guidance for planning healthy and safe environments and services which include:

Daniel Fuller, Lise Gauvin, Yan Kestens, Mark Daniel, Michel Fournier, Patrick Morency, and Louis Drouin American Journal of Public Health 2013 !03;3. e85-e92. Print.

The current review was managed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Moher et al., 2009) and established guidelines for narrative synthesis by Popay et al. (2006).

Since 2004, all services in England that work with children and thier families are operating

Permission for conducting the research and using the spring 2016 ACHA-NCHA dataset was granted by the School of Public Health at the University of Saskatchewan. The project reviewed and approved by the University of Saskatchewan Research Ethics Review Board (REB). A request to obtain Canadian data for the selected variables for this analysis was sent to the ACHA-NCHA. Information regarding the University of Saskatchewan survey was obtained through collaboration with the Student Health Services office within the university campus.

First, Alvaro is unequivocal in her argument, which is supported by numerous research studies. Her paper was funded by the Canadian Institute of Health Research which is the Government of Canada 's health research investment agency (CIHR) which indicates the relevance and importance of the issue to national health. Alvaro references research published in peer reviewed sources that appeals to ethos such as the International Journal of Public Health, the Canadian Journal of Public Health and

The client has every right to choose whether or not they receive the treatment that they are recommended by a counselor. By providing the client with any information that can contribute to them making an informed decision on their treatment plan, we can be sure that we have

Source of Funding: This study was funded from a project grant (565335) awarded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

Every child deserves a safe place to interact with other children, regardless of their race, religion, culture or their economic background.  In the spring of 2009, I recognized in our community of color the need for a safe park where children could play, and parents could feel safe sending their children. For nearly ten years, children in this community needed a place to collaborate and community members to gather in friendship and fellowship. This area of Fort Valley has been explicitly overlooked for many years because it’s made up low- income citizens of color. After recognizing the economic neglect inside our community, I became inspired to decade my Eagle Scout project around rebuilding our neglected park.

Methods and Materials: This cross-sectional study was done from May 2010 to November 2011 after

The quantitative meta-analysis demonstrated careful attention to many aspects of study validity. Their systematic review methods followed the frameworks of the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance for undertaking review in health care (Westwood et al., 2015). Two reviewers independently screened all of the abstracts identified by searches. These strategies reduce the threats to validity. The reliability was achieved through rigorous investigation of possible source of heterogeneity to warrant internal consistency using stratified analyses based on predetermined variables. The finding from such robust methodologies have considerable clinical relevance and applications as they can change the current practice in many EDs.

Countless of these reviews are complex and differ largely on which clinical trials are available, the quality of the trials and the measurements of their healthcare results (Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention, 2016).

This article used Meta-analysis as a means of quantitatively synthesizing findings across many research studies. This is inclusive of findings of 163 reports of different studies.

There are numerous specific systematic review methods described in the literature with each method having a specific fit for purpose, appropriately considering the purpose of the reviews, the types of questions to be answered, and evidence available for inclusion in