Explantatory Like Restrepo Analysis

Overall the book is a great historical book that teaches people not just about the horrors of the war but those who continued to fight for the justice for all humans. It explains the difficulty of finding these people and the amount of work required to find and capture these

The war film genre includes films about warfare, including naval, air or land battles. Films in this genre may focus on the battles, prisoners of war, military training, life during wartime or morality and humanitarian issues of warfare. This genre commonly includes works of fiction, works based on historical facts and occasionally works based on alternate-history fiction. According to American Cinema/American Culture, the genre also includes four narrative elements: the suspension of morality during times of war, the prioritization of collective goals over individual motivations, the rivalry between men and their objectification of women and the issues of reintegrating veterans. (Belton 165-71)

It is a story about the soldiers and their experiences and emotions that are brought

The documentary follows a simple style presenting short testimonies of veterans like Livorio Correa, Alvino Mendoza, and Catalina Bernal who agree they were not aware of the implications of combats. Nonetheless, they perceived as a both an honor and a responsibility to defend the United States.

In my opinion, Walter Dean Myers describes the scenery of the book so well, it basically feels like your alongside these soldiers in battle. He would describe the sounds, such as the whirl of the helicopter blades or the sound of the copious amounts of m-16's firing. The thing that really made him stand out however, was the amount of heartfelt emotion he made the characters express. This made me, the reader, have an almost personal connection towards these characters. It made me feel like I knew them from a past life.

I read the section about the battles that took place during WWII. It brought to my minds that in real life. There are more important things during a war than finding a private Ryan. War is a huge event and the little things like finding a person to keep the family name going is too small to include in war history. This is what separates the movies from the real life. Another difference is they don't show the actual planning it takes to start an attack or the inelegance that is needed to set up the perfect defense barrier to prevent the advancement of the enemy soldiers. A real battle can last days, weeks, months, or years, compared to movie war that lasts not even a day and has one guy or one platoon take on the entire other side. The casualties of real war is tremendous, rather than movies where you see almost the same characters in the whole movie accomplishing some of the most intense tasks with only one or two dying. Also, in movie war you don't see the other side's horror. You think all the opponents are bad horrible people that deserve to die, when they are just soldiers doing their job and the only reason we are fighting them is because of a bad leader or government. So in the movies every enemy deserves to die and should be shown no mercy, but the actual thing about that is that the enemy is just like any other soldier. And furthermore when the good guys lose a battle in a

War is portrayed as something emotional that every living being goes through in their lifetime. Most of the people experience.

As much as I thought I knew what war was like, the book Fear has showed me how wrong I was. I was aware that war was horrible, but not to the extent this book showed me. I thought more soldiers felt

Bodies were falling with every step, cries for help grew unbearably loud, now everyone knew what war is like. War is a place for men, and everyone has different reactions to its brutality. Between Charlie from Soldier's Heart and Henry from Red Badge of Courage there are many differences. People can be very contrasting between each other while going through times of desperateness, fear, and stress, and that’s the exact case with Henry and Charlie. In opposition to that, the soldiers from these stories do in fact have comparability. Enticing, that is what it is to see the differences in what is thought to be very similar stories, but surprisingly they do have their differences.

There is one scene where the three flag raisers entered a crowded stadium before a football game which typified how an image of war can be so different to the reality of war. The flash photography, the cheering, the roar of the crowd all went to John Bradley’s head and he had flash backs of the fighting on Iwo Jima and the genuine heroes that he had left behind. This scene contrasts what the reality of war, were all the men are dug in and fighting for there life, and the images of war. Ira Hayes says “I know it’s a good thing, raising the money and that, ‘cause we need it. But, I can’t take them calling me a hero. All I did was try not to get shot. Some of the things I saw done, things I did, they weren’t things to be proud of, you know?” Clint Eastwood shows continuously, through his characters physiology shows how one single photo can be so different what really makes up the battle of Iwo Jima. The aim was to get war bonds; the minds of the three main characters through Clint Eastwood’s directing showed a strong insight to how the reality of a war and an image of war can be so contrasting.

The rambunctious behavior of the soldier’s triumphant victory is a strong message visually for the viewer. These soldiers struggle to find their identity and once the war ends, the identity they’ve build at war vanishes, (McCutcheon, 2007). As a result, they essentially lose a part of them selves, (McCutcheon, 2007). When they return home, many soldiers struggle with psychological issues that prevent them from resuming their once regular lives, (McCutcheon, 2007). The images of soldiers celebrating at the end of war give the viewer a taste of this problem. This also allows the viewer insight to the deeper issues surrounding an American soldier’s mental stability and mentality. Through this image, along with many others throughout the film, the viewer is able to dig deeper and truly analyze what they are seeing.

While watching this film you may find yourself experiencing some of the same emotions as the characters in the film this allows you to be in the movie letting you be a part of an important event in our history. This is what makes the film so unique. Its full of different scenarios that keep you wondering what is going to happen next. I think that this film is a very close representation of what WWII was really like.

The film showed me a lot about the horrors of the war. It was a very hard and long war.

Since 1968, there have been at least 25 films made that portray the events of the Vietnam War. Historians have to ask themselves when watching these films, "Did the fictional character represent historical figures accurately? Is this how a soldier would react in this situation?" The point of view of the director of the film can change with simple alterations in camera angles. For example, a view from the ground of a battle seen can show how the innocent people had the war in their own backyards. The view from a helicopter can show Viet Cong firing rounds at American troops and the troops can't tell the difference between the innocent and the enemy. The audience feels empathy and sympathy for the person from whose point of view the

Most of the films pictured the troopers as maturing and evolving as a result of the war continued onward. The initial reactions of the soldiers' to the war surroundings were really completely different from the soldiers' make-up and outlook at the tip of each film.