I have also watched many films about war non of which was a detailed and explantatory like Restrepo. The fact that these filmmakers took the time and went to the battlefield with the soldiers show that they were determine to show what life is like at war. Hetherington and Junger did not just make a documentary telling us how they feel about war instead they took us on a journey. In this journey we saw exactly what goes on and how the soldiers felt. Every shot was personal in the film. I think this film was the first documentary I have ever seen that was straight forwarded about the events in war.
Overall the book is a great historical book that teaches people not just about the horrors of the war but those who continued to fight for the justice for all humans. It explains the difficulty of finding these people and the amount of work required to find and capture these
First, the reader must understand just what makes a good "war story". The protagonist of the novel, Tim O'Brien, gives us his
The horrors of war were depicted by the constant threats to the characters lives, the brutal conditions of the bad weather, hunger and combat. Soldiers had to battle the enemy along with nature. Soldiers would become stressed, paranoid and start losing their personalities. As Captain Miller says, “I just know that every man I kill, the farther away from home I feel.” This quote shows the mental toll on these soldiers.
This book does give you the feeling of actually being there and living it. I’d give this book a three star, because it gives you just enough to keep you interested, but it doesn’t give you enough to have you hooked on it. To say the leas t this not the most exciting read so don’t let the title fool you by making you think “war? Oh yea!” it’s not that intense.
As much as I thought I knew what war was like, the book Fear has showed me how wrong I was. I was aware that war was horrible, but not to the extent this book showed me. I thought more soldiers felt
The “Lost Battalion” film was a great film about World War One. It showed a lot about the horrors of the war. It also brilliantly depicted the reality of the war.
Combining all these serious themes into a very entertaining book should attract many readers. However, there was some confusion with the story line. Since this book is a collection of interviews, it wasn’t a conventional story. When I first started the book, I wasn’t sure why I was jumping from country to country and why each story was completely different. As I continued to read the book, I was able to understand that these were a collection of eyewitness accounts of the war. Also, Max Brooks uses a rife amount of vulgar language which I think could have been kept out. However, it made it real and that’s what this book is about.
War is portrayed as something emotional that every living being goes through in their lifetime. Most of the people experience.
The difficulties of staying sane are immense during war and tragedies. Despite being institutionalized and constant attempts to change one’s mindset and demeanor, the war didn 't alter Robert Leckie’s overall personality and traits as a man. Continuous physical and psychological battles erupted during World War II. Robert Leckie managed to remain sane, balanced, and humble enough to paint a clear picture of graphic and vivid altercations and battles.
“The effective war film is often the one in which the action begins after the war, when there is nothing but ruins and desolation everywhere…”
Film makers use many historical events to spark up and idea for a movie. One historical event that is commonly used is war. One advantage a film maker has when using war as a movie plot is that there is already a lot of drama in war. This may seem like a good advantage for the film maker, however focusing on all of the drama of war leaves much of the actual info. When watching a war movie, you may feel like you have an understanding about the war, but when you really compare a war movie to an actual war you find that there is a lot of factual information left out. One may ask why would directors and film makers leave out the facts of war and focus on the drama? After reading The Faces of Battle by John Keegan and reviewing war movies
The reader will get an increasingly detailed image of how the soldiers emotionally respond to the happenings throughout the war due to this composition.
The documentary Warton starts off with clips of wars and interviews from past soldiers explaining what’s troubling them, explaining what they see during their time in service. After this, a narrator starts reading letters from a soldier named Angelo Crapsey and how his letters change during the course of war. The documentary also portrays interviews with different soldiers, wives, parents, and children, some whose child committed suicide during their time in war, others who committed suicide after coming back home, as well as some who survived their time in the war and came home and were completely different. For instance, a mother told the story of how her son came home but never truly returned and how both her husband and son committed suicide, she read a letter her son had written just before committing suicide saying that he felt guilty of taking other people’s lives and that it was his turn to take his own. Afterward, they interviewed two men explaining how
Bowden shows the gruesome effect of war by not covering up any of the details that he has learned from his sources that were in the war (found in the back of
Le marché du jus de fruits fait partie du marché générique des boissons. Si l'on considère le marché du jus de fruits comme le marché principal, ses marchés environnants sont : les boissons rafraîchissantes plates, l'eau du robinet, l'eau en bouteille, les sodas, le lait, le sirop, le café, le thé et les boissons alcoolisées.