preview

Explication Of The 's Story ' Presentation, A Fellow Classmate Of Mine Claimed That Invisible '

Decent Essays

Rational Investigations Of Truths In “The Significance Of Allusions In Trueblood’s Story” presentation, a fellow classmate of mine claimed that Invisible was an Existentialist, and not to offend but frankly in my mind that was so wrong. There is no way to prove that Invisible was a practicing Existentialist. While I agree that Invisible is searching for himself and there are several overarching Existentialist themes present in the novel, I do not believe that you can call him an Existentialist. Philosophy is complicated. A school of thought cannot be determined for someone else. Labeling someone else as a (insert type of philosophy) when they have not clearly stated it them self proves to be wrong. It is too personal of a concept to label someone else. Precisely why you should not lable someone who appears gay as gay. Because that would be so wrong and so not socially exceptable. According to allaboutphilosophy.org, Existentialists believes that “society is unnatural and its traditiona,l religious, and secular rules are arbitrary”. Arbitrary means based off of random choice opposed to reason or system. That definition clashes with Invisibles view of society. Nowhere in the novel did Invisible ignore the social and legal systems. Invisible most often adhered to the social, legal, and religious systems in place. Existentialists do not believe in outside forces contributing to decision making (free will) but this is extremely contradictory to the given situation he faced.

Get Access