The last parliamentary election in Kuwait was held on July 28th of 2013. The call for candidates to declare their candidacy was announced 40 days earlier. WC represented 3% of the total candidates (8 out of 310). The Kuwaiti tweets posted over those 40 days were searched and retrieved using a Twitter search through the analytics engine of Topsy.com. This search engine stores all tweets posted since 2006. The names of the eight WC were the search keywords. We retrieved 1520 tweets, in addition to the tweets posted by the WC themselves, which were separated from the rest of the tweets. The majority of previous research which has analyzed sentiment towards political candidates on Twitter has selected particular pre-election periods as a time …show more content…
Luckily, we did not come up with any accounts that are accessible only for followers. In previous research, the gender of Twitter users was identified through the user’s first name (Bamman, et al. 2014; Burger, et al. 2011 & Cunha, et al. 2014). However, using only the first name to infer the gender of a Twitter user was not an option for the present study, as it is not uncommon for Kuwaiti Twitter users, especially women, to use pseudonyms as their user names. The tweets (unit of analysis) were analyzed in order to identify the components of both positive and negative attitudes towards the WC. This unit was coded into three categories: positive, neutral and negative. The coders read each tweet as a whole in order to determine whether it was in favor of a candidate, against her, or just making a neutral reference to her. Neutral references included such things as posting a link to a news story in traditional media, quoting a candidate, and posting an announcement for a candidate’s rally or media appearance. Although such tweets could have been representative of a positive leaning towards a candidate, we focused our analysis only on the explicit, verbalized political expressions of the tweeters. All tweets were coded according to the main theme of the opinions expressed. When a tweet had more than one theme, each
With social media at the people’s disposal, users are able to share their thoughts and to keep up to date with current events. Its no surprise to find issues trending on social media every now and then; this year’s election was no exception. Politics are without a doubt a greatly debated topic. Millions of post and articles taking sides flew all across social media; some were true while others were not. A supposed satire letter written by author C.S. Lewis became popular throughout social media during the campaigns. Letter is as followed:
Local elections are a very important political concern for all people. For me, social media is a very effective form of communication. I am quickly able to access posts and information pertaining to local elections through candidate’s pages. This rhetorical analysis will analyze three Facebook posts relating to local elections in two Ohio counties. The context for these posts is the November 8th election.
Different types of medias are booming with campaign advertisements, attacks from different parties, and most importantly the arguments that affect the decisions we make. Furthermore, Twitter has been one of the most influencing subjects that has been primarily recorded under my multimedia sections; this social media has reflected the thousands of tweets that display the conflicting opinions of numerous Canadians. As I was scrolling through, I could not help but realize the amount of
Social networking sites such as Twitter has made a tremendous change, in the aspects of how people network and communicate with each other over the past couple of years. Remarkably, Twitter was created in March 2006. By February 2010, the hype of this self-styled “New Twitter Experience,” Twitter users were sending out over 50 million tweets per day. In Peggy Orenstein’s article “I Tweet, Therefore I Am,” she exploits the argument that people should tweet for themselves, and not for the pleasing of their followers. Even though, since the article was featured in the The New Your Times. The relevance of this article was intended to be read by the readers of The Times, which most of them were businessmen and politicians between ages of 30-35. Nevertheless, this article was written on July 30th 2010, printed, and published in the book, The
The use of twitter by both the viewers and the candidates are geared toward one particular goal: to try to change the mind of voters. By candidates operating on Twitter they possess the ability to make instant rebuttals to something that another candidate has said without having to release an official statement or waiting until the next debate. Also in an age of social media candidates and their campaigns believe that it is one of the most effective ways to broadcast information and connect with voters. Twitter users also use this median as a way to make fun at a candidate’s position or simply try to convince others to change the way they have chosen to vote. Many twitter users from the Republican party took to the social media website to bash the democratic candidates and their policy positions. One user slammed a comment made by Governor Martin O’Malley that the greatest threat facing the United States was climate change. This made for a twitter field day with other users implying that the democratic candidates do not take the threat of terrorism and ISIS seriously which disqualifies them from the presidency. These type of instances can have negative effects for either party because of how quickly a retweet can make a statement viral and could end up severely hurting a campaign. However, this reaction did not alter my impression of the candidates or the debate at
By following the Twitter handle @hillaryclinton, one can view live tweets from Clinton, and her team. Since the demographic for Twitter users is more heavily weighted towards young adults, (Journalism.com 11/21/15). After famous baseball player, Yogi Berra, passed away, Clinton took a break from tweeting about politics and recognized his greatness in the game. (Hillary Clinton. Twitter 9/23/15) This tweet shows that in addition to a political agenda, Clinton is also trying to appear more relatable. Because tweets are only 140-characters, Clinton must convey her message in a digestible medium. On September 18th, Clinton tweeted, “the House voting to defund Planned Parenthood is an attack on women’s health – nothing more, nothing less. Republicans should be ashamed” (Twitter 9/18/15). This clear and bold statement reveals Clinton’s views of defunding Planned Parenthood in a way easy for Twitter users to read, react, and then immediately share. There are thousands of responses to her statements demonstrating Twitter as a forum for people to voice their opinions. Through the medium specificity Twitter brings, Clinton is able to reach a broader range of voters in real-time with her distinct
The 2016 presidential election may happen to be one of the most memorable elections to have ever been. From the campaign speeches, to the Democratic and Republican National conventions, and even the presidential debates; Americans seemed to constantly be voicing their opinions on every aspect of the election, and who they believe is the more suitable candidate for president, especially on social media. The 2016 presidential election marks one of the more recent elections where we start to see social media’s impact on it. We see how presidential candidates use social media as a platform to voice about updates on their campaign as well as communicate with their supporters. With the continue rise in the number of social media users as well as politicians now using social media, how much has its impact had on elections and Americans outlook on the campaign.
President Trump’s use of Twitter has become a controversial issue since he took office. His approval rating has plummeted to thirty-seven percent since taking office in January, with many complaining about his tweets. Numerous authors, such as Maya Oppenheim, Shamila N. Chaudhary, Berkeley Lovelace Jr., James F. Peltz, Cecilia Kang, and Nahal Toosi have written about the effects of President Donald Trump’s tweets. Furthermore, these authors have indicated that Trump’s tweets have caused increasing problems for our country. The issue of Donald Trump’s tweets is represented by how they affect our relationships with other countries, how they affect the profit of businesses and companies, and that his tweets present a threat to national security.
The text, Writing on Demand: Best Practices and Strategies for Success is designed specifically for teachers by teachers. With a quote on the cover of the text that is highlighted by a bright orange background and explicitly states that this book is “Ideal for SAT, ACT, AP, and State Assessment Exams”, the text quickly announces that its core audience is going to be teachers within the middle school to high school range. Given the aim of this text, it proves to be a highly beneficial work for aiding teachers in understanding how to adequately prepare their students for the rigors of writing on demand, be it for regular classroom assignments or standardized tests. After a thorough analysis of the text I found many of
Children between the age of Five and Seven will be tested with a new drug to reduce hyperactivity. In this experiment, there should be three groups with three different ages: Five years, Six years, and Seven years old. There has to be an equal number of boys and girls in each age group for each group there will also be a control group. The children will be chosen through random assignment to be placed in an experimental group or the control group. All six groups will be in a kid-friendly environment such as a playground or park for one hour.
Social media has grown at phenomenal rates over the past decade, with its rise being easily visible in several fields such as publishing, business, and activism, among others. The rise of its use in the field of politics is well known by those who are on and off social media, as a result of increasing number of politicians using this global platform to their maximum advantage.
The following themes will be used to provide background for the documentary, post truth, the spectacle, media and finally focussing on the social media giant twitter. These are the most prevalent topics when it comes to researching the recent American election, and will be explored and discussed through the literature review.
Kriti Gautam Professor Sherry Sharifian Federal Government 2305-71433 28 October 2017 Donald Trump and Mike Pence on Social Media: A Study on How They Use It Social media is capable of being an effective means of communication, if one knows how to use it properly. “Ethical and social factors need to be considered when communicating to the public, through social media” (Bergal). Elected leaders should not be afraid to speak their minds, but they should really think before they post. They should not post if the post would cause harm to or insult a certain group of people. Whatever they post in social media should almost resemble what is written in their “official” government pages. I conducted a study on Donald Trump and Mike Pence’s social media pages, from October 12 to October 25, 2017 (14 days), to see if they use their social media effectively or not, and the analysis and discussion of this study is presented in this paper.
How presidential candidates present themselves in the media can be proven to impact election results dramatically. Political figure using social media did not start to become more common until after the 2008 election because Twitter and Facebook were just recently created, but by looking at data from the past two elections it shows that the news presidential candidates put on their social media can correlate with how people will decide to vote. After researching what topics political candidates post and how they present themselves in the media with election results it can be established that a candidate’s presence in social media can have an impact on how people might vote in an election. “By 2008 candidate websites were standard and campaigns
While the negative tweets outnumbered the positive ones (31% negative versus 21% positive), the women tweeters expressed significantly more positive attitudes towards WC than the men tweeters did (X2 = .21, p = 0.01). Women contributed 385 tweets (38% positive, 36% neutral, and 26% negative), while men contributed 797 tweets (20% positive, 38% neutral, and 42% negative). The remainder of the relevant tweets were generated by news sites.