Exxon Mobil Merger Essay

This paper is about two companies that went through same type of change (merger and acquisition) with different outcomes. Merger is combination of two or more companies in which the assets and liabilities of the selling firms are absorbed by the buying firm. Although the buying firm may be a considerably different organization after the merger, it retains its original identity while Acquisition is the purchase of an asset or an entire company (Sherman, A. J., & Hart, M. A. (2005). Chapter 1: The Basics of Mergers and Acquisitions. In, Mergers & Acquisitions from A to Z. American Management Association International.).

The company ExxonMobil offers an interesting insight into the inner workings of an oil company because not more than fourteen years ago they were two separate and very successful companies both sitting at the top of the industry. In the year 1980 the two companies bolstered sales revenue that towards the top of their industry. Exxon with 103 million dollars worth of revenue was by far the most dominant beating out the closest competitor, which was Royal Dutch by over thirty million dollars. Mobil Oil was not nearly as dominant in revenue but still bolstered a respectable with 59.5 million dollars worth of profit placing them in the upper half of the industry.1 As the 1980’s went on the oil industry began going through a bit of reconstruction in which efficiency and profit shot to the forefront of the minds of both oil executives and the companies stockholders. As stated by and executive of Exxon, “Exxon confirms its ‘intention to run a tight ship . . . and strive to become the low-cost operator in each area of our business’. Restructuring included the sale of Exxon Office Systems, Reliance Electric Co., and its New York headquarters, and the reorganization into fewer divisions, several of them

ExxonMobil is identified as one of the world’s leading oil and gas businesses. It manages market commodities and means countrywide. ExxonMobil is entail in “marketing, gas, and oil exploration, transportation and production in roughly 200 nations” (ExxonMobil, 2015). This company furnishes assistance and products under label names such as “Mobil, Esso, and Exxon. ExxonMobil is known as one of the biggest oil industrial installation where a substance is refined in the nation” (ExxonMobil, 2015). This essay discusses ExxonMobil’s strategic initiative from

Mergers and acquisitions have become a growing trend for companies to inorganically grow a business within its particular industry. There are many goals that companies may be looking to achieve by doing this, but the main reason is to guarantee long-term and profitable growth for their business. Companies have to keep up with a rapidly increasing global market and increased competition. With the struggle for competitive advantage becoming stronger and stronger, it is almost essential to achieve these mergers. Through research I will attempt to dissect the best practices for achieving merger success.

Between the Exxon and Chevron companies, Chevron proves to be more profitable than Exxon since Chevron shrunk less in

From the recent case data, ExxonMobil has not acted irresponsibility in pricing its gasoline products. Outside of the grocery industry, I have not heard of any business segments surviving on less than a 5% profit margin. In reading that ExxonMobil reported only a net profit of 8.5%3, it is difficult to state that the firm over priced its products to reap abnormal profits. Although Mr. Lee Raymond’s $400 million retirement seems grossly out of proportion in utilitarian terms, adding these funds back into the firm’s bottom line would not change the profit results. With profit margins of less than 10%, it is unlikely that ExxonMobil would be able to keep the price of gasoline fixed if sweet crude oil were to increase from $80 per barrel to $88. This 10% increase in raw material cost would have to be passed through to the customer in the form of higher prices for the firm to survive.

With this idea in mind Rockefeller bought the largest and best refiners and then proceeded to centralize their management in hopes of better efficiency and economy he would come to name this business Standard Oil (“Rockefeller, John D.”). At this point Rockefeller was a successful businessman but nothing in comparison to what he was to become. Rockefeller decided that he would buy out another large shareholder of Standard Oil due to their lack of ambition to want to expand Standard oil further than it currently was. Rockefeller later wrote that buying out the Clark’s “was the day that determined my career (John, D. Rockefeller)”. After further expansion Standard oil was producing 505 barrels of oil a day which was more than twice that capable of any other local competitors (“John Davison Rockefeller.”).

Formed by the merger of two big oil companies in 1999, Exxon and Mobil, the corporation is now the world’s 8th largest by revenue and third largest publicly traded company by market capitalization. Exxon’s history is the story of two groups; both Exxon and Mobil are descendants of John D. Rockefeller 's Standard Oil Company of Ohio, incorporated as Standard Oil Trust in 1882.

AN example, in 2008, Hewlett Packet purchased Electronic Data Systems to enhance the services aspect of the partnering technology offerings (Yurko, 1996). Marketing networks now give companies much wider customer access including overnight services. One such merger is the Takeda Pharmaceutical Inc. Although distribution chains work great to increase the bottom line, these mergers are not well received by federal agencies like the Federal Trade Commission. The concern being monopolization which is when one company controls too much of a given industry. Another driver of mergers is a desire for a leadership change. Sometimes the owner of the high technology firms simply wants to sale out and has problems finding a successor within to take the helm. Hence, a merger holds an

When companies combine/merge the whole objective is to gain new opportunities, gain market share, grow the business, to become more innovative and to improve product offerings, utilizing/sharing the existing resources and data. From the case

Over the last 125 years, ExxonMobil was a regional marketer of oil in the Unites States. Later it becomes one of the largest publicly traded petroleum and petrochemical enterprise in the world. An oil tanker which named

Exxon and Chevron are no doubt some of the leading incorporated oil companies on the globe. Exxon Corp. is the second largest oil firm after Royal Dutch Shell, it is respected for getting the biggest revenue return in 2008 which no company in the U.S. have ever reported before. According to Wilson (2009) Chevron has managed to show a lot of profitability in the market despite the decease in its oil production. It graded as one of firms which made a billion dollars profit within a week in the period of July to September 2008. Regardless of profitability trends set by the two oil firms in the U.S. market, they have been facing financial decline like the rest of the companies in other industries. The two firms are like two sailing ships which are taking longer time to sink. In the last few years, the production capacity of Chevron and Exxon has decreased and their listings on the stock market have become weak. The continuation of construction and drilling which requires billions of dollars in expense of oil production might make them experience a bigger financial crisis (Wilson, 2009).

One of the most reputable resources that Exxon Mobil has today is a strong brand name. Exxon Mobil operates all over the world and is recognized in every part of the world (Datamonitor, 2008). When people all over the world know who a company is, what they do, and where they are located, the company gains a unique competitive advantage over

extracted from the combination of the two businesses. For example, such a consolidation would allow

This report consists of financial analysis of Exxon Mobil Corporation and it is based on the company annual report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, on the company’s official documents placed at their website and on other appropriate sources. For convenience and simplicity, in this report the terms ExxonMobil, Exxon, Esso and Mobil, as well as terms like Corporation, Company, their and its, are sometimes used as abbreviated references to specific affiliates or groups of affiliates.