Eyeglasses In 12 Angry Men

Satisfactory Essays
The conflict here concerns the jurors who argued over whether the woman actually wore the eyeglasses. The conflict started when Juror 9 pointed noticed the indentation on Juror 4’s nose, which reminded him of the woman who testified that she saw the boy murder his father from across the el track. If she was an eyeglass wearer, the probability of her not wearing it during the time of the murder would be high as she would have had no time to put them on as she jumped out of bed because the light went off right at the time of murder. At that point,most jurors started to agree that there was a room for reasonable doubt with regards the woman’s testimony as she had those marking on her nose and the fact that she was not wearing glass in court because
Get Access