preview

F. A. Kunz's Three Reasons For The Existence Of The Senate

Decent Essays

Professor F.A. Kunz described his three personal reasons for the Senates existence: The committees' job is to give "a skilled and leisurely consideration to the technical provisions of a bill to scrutinize public accounts and departmental estimates; and to inquire.” However, Kunz’s first requirement of the senate is no longer relevant, as legislative drafting skills have dramatically improved since he wrote this in 1965. Additionally, Kudz’s second point is that the senate must scrutinize public accounts and departmental estimates, however the senate, and the entire parliament as a whole is not doing an adequate job in regards to this. The parliament has been becoming increasingly unaware of government spending, and has now become a “ceremonial …show more content…

The last reason Kunz has for the existence of the senate is to inquire. Although Kunz argues this to be one of the three reasons for the Senates existence, many people do not believe that the senate should be an investigative body. Former senator Grattan O’Leary says “I have always disagreed with the Leader of the Government when I thought he seemed to be trying to make this chamber an investigative body. That is not our business.” Professor Kunz described three main theories for why the Senate was in existence in 1965, and today they are either irrelevant, not being accomplished or disagreed with as a function. This is an example of the Senates lack of relevance today, and shows that the Senate could be abolished with no substantial …show more content…

Craig Scott, an MP for the NDP put the motion in front of the house, claiming the senate was “useless” and “senators appear in the upper chamber and average of 56 days a year”. Craig Scott also discusses how there are good senators, however, these senators agree that the senate is a flawed body that blocks bills from coming into the house of commons. The purposed bill was defeated when both the Liberals and Conservatives voted against it. This lead to harsh criticism from the NDP party towards the conservatives, and Stephen Harper. The NDP points to the fact that Stephen Harper promised to never point unelected senators, yet he has broken that promise and appointed 58 unelected senators.Harper appointing 58 senators has essentially made the Senate a conservative body payed by the taxpayer. This is a major flaw in the senate, and a large reason the Senate is so dysfunctional and must be

Get Access