Fahrenheit 9/11 Analysis

The concept behind this is to emphasize Bush's militaristic policies concerning Afghanistan, suggesting that Bush is only concerned with conflict. The repetition of these messages work for an obvious reason; as Moore repeats a message over and over, the audience comprehend and understand it quicker than just saying the message once.

In the book, Why America Slept: The Failure to Prevent 9/11, by Gerald Posner he argues that the act of terrorism that occurred on September 11, 2001 could have and should have been prevented. He presented a powerful case of how stupidity and misdirected priorities made America an easy aim for terrorists. Gerald Posner, the author of the book was a former Wall Street Lawyer, award winning investigative journalist and bestselling author. Posner purposefully wrote this book to demonstrate all the clues that were given out prior to the attack and inform us on previously undisclosed information after a thorough 18-month investigation. Posner’s goal was to discover what the CIA, FBI, and others in the Government were doing behind the scenes for at least a decade leading up to 9/11. The intended audience for this book is anyone who is willing to open their eyes on the true occurrences that happened on 9/11. The title of the piece is related directly to the book and the subject matter of it. America slept on all the clues that they received that there would be a terrorist attack and the book demonstrated how exactly they failed to prevent the acts that occurred on 9/11. Why America Slept is such a staggering book and Posner successfully demonstrates to the audience how 9/11 could have been prevented through his use of examples and facts.

The obvious bias illustrated throughout Michael Moore’s film certainly does detract from the messages conveyed however when presented in the right circumstances it adds more value to the messages. The obvious bias leaves many people questioning the credibility of the director’s message as it doesn’t show the full spectrum of the situation, which is what documentaries are for, and ultimately this detracts the films message. However, in some circumstances the obvious bias brings more light on important aspects which should be acted upon thus adding more value the message being portrayed. Michael Moore has directed over 12 documentaries and a handful of them have been awarded with prestigious film awards. “Where to invade next”, “Sicko”, “Bowling for Columbine”, “Capitalism: a love story” and “Fahrenheit 9/11”, these are just half of the documentaries in which Michael Moore has directed. The purpose of a documentary is to present a nonfictional motion picture which aims to promote or

“Since 9/11, the Bush administration has used that tragic event as a justification to rip up our constitution and our civil liberties. And I honestly believe that one or two 9/11s, and martial law will be declared in our country and we're inching towards a police state” -Michael Moore. This quote is the fine definition to describe the film “Unconstitutional: The War on Civil Liberties.” In this short little summary and potential analysis(mostly opinion) will be about how this film describes the after effects 9/11 and the rushed passing of the Patriot Act.

After analyzing the 9/11 Commission report is it clear that there were multiple structural shortcomings on behalf of the Federal Bureau of investigations(FBI) that may have contributed to their inability to stop the 9/11 attacks. Additionally, there was lack of oversight on the FBI by the Executive and Legislative Branches.

The title of "Fahrenheit 9/11" is a play on the title of the famous Ray Bradbury novel, "Fahrenheit 451" in which society has been transformed into an authoritarian, repressive regime, in which subversive ideas are crimes and books are burned. In the book, a lonely protagonist is awakened to this reality and joins the struggle to keep underground dissidence alive.

Written Assignment Unit #5 3/6/2018 September 11 September 11th 2001 will always be remembered as a tragic day for the American people. It was a day where thousands of people died because others believed that the freedom that Americans had was sinful and wrong in the eyes of their G-d. But the American people would carry on from this tragedy and prosper for many years to come. One of the things we do not associate much with the attacks is sports. Sporting events were in fact affected by the attacks. Personally, it was not in my mind when I watched those towers fall. One of the things we do forget, is that sporting events bring happiness and comfort to a damaged country. Frank Linsky and Lena Williams wrote an article called Many Sporting Events Called off or Postposed which was about all the

They demonstrate both sides and highlight the argument surrounding the 9/11 conspiracy theory. Firstly, the title is called Debunking 9/11 Myths, which is used similarly to the way “Zeitgeist” broke down the “9/11 myth.” Both sides are claiming that their opposing argument is overwhelmingly false. In Debunking, the text presents the claim made by many who believe in the conspiracy theory. In this text, the authors present scientific facts that debunk the theories they presented as claims. This is a more objective way to discuss the 9/11 conspiracies because they are presenting both sides of the argument, unlike any other source discussed before. The tone is undermining to the other side. For instance, even on the back cover it states: “The investigation focuses on concrete facts rather than political theories, and its conclusion are supported by hard evidence…” So, the text only contemplates the evidence that can be debunked scientifically. The text is objective to the extent of their overarching opinion, in which 9/11 was not an inside job constructed by the American government but a terrorist

The claims that are presented in this report may very well be the Haunting pieces of puzzle that shake millions of patriotic Americans down to their very roots. This is information that has been overlooked and tucked away into the deep corners of the American Pride that resides in the hearts of millions of Americans. There is multitudes of evidence that contradict the credibility of the 9/11 Official Commission Report. There are significant gaps within the Commission Report, which contradict the FACTUAL events that took place on the day of September 11th, 2001. Please be advised that the information that you are going to view is very significant. I offer no conclusions, I only wish to present this information, and let the reader draw

The official story of 9/11 is a conspiracy theory in that the government claims 19 hijackers conspired together to hijack four planes and create terror in the world. Four American airplanes were hijacked; two were driven into the World Trade Centers and the third airplane into the Pentagon. The fourth airplane suspected target was the White House, but it was diverted by the brave men and women aboard that hijacked airplane, and crashed the airline jet before it could reach its target. It was like time stood still as America watched through television broadcast these unbelievable and horrifying events taking place. The reports told of the smell the jet fuel, burning flesh, and people jumping out windows to their death to escape the flames.

The September 11 attacks were tragic events that had spread shockwaves of horror and grief across the United States. The tragedy became the subject of controversy as some skeptics began to doubt the details reported to have transpired that day. Some people question its legitimacy, theorizing that the Bush administration devised and orchestrated the attacks to further its agenda. Filmmaker Dylan Avery discusses and promotes this prevalent conspiracy theory in his documentary, Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup. Avery argues that the government possessed foreknowledge of the attacks by comparing them to precedents of similar situations. He challenges the official explanations and provides his analyzations of evidence from the reports and media. Avery effectively appeals to pathos, ethos, and logos in his film, but his compelling argument is ultimately undermined by fallacies.

The basis of discussion in this essay will propose arguments as to why the 9/11 attacks could not have been foreseen and consequently why the actions of the Clinton Administration and bureaucratic bodies under this presidency left bush in an unlucky position.

In a recent study on conspiracy theories 9/11 became the most widely discussed. When asked, well over 50% of Americans believe that George Bush was behind the 9/11 attacks. This survey goes to show how this is not a joking matter, and that people truly believe in this issue. With more people believing then not, it is clear the facts speak the truth (Ghose, 2016). Not only does the average U.S. citizen believe in the theory. Well respected, college graduates also speak their mind about how Bush is guilty in the 9/11 attacks. One physicist devotes his time to prove the original story wrong. He did many test, and found out that the story had no way of being true. This man’s profession is to focus on what physically could be true and what could not be. With the support of him, the 9/11 theory gains a lot of support (WorldNetDaily Staff, 2016). Lastly, the PPresident of The United States may very well be the strongest person to help people support the truth behind 9/11. It is clear that Bush did 9/11, and President Trump believes so too. One reporter describes how an a speech Trump mentions how he blames Bush and his brother Jeb for the attacks. With the President believing Bush was guilty, the people should have no other choice but to believe in the correct side (Glueck, 2016). Despite the evidence proving Bush and his administration are guilty, some people still refuse to see and accept the

Michael Moore’s latest film, “Fahrenheit 9/11,” presents a critical look at the administration of George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism. In this film Moore investigates the rapid growth of the United States government and its trend of trampling the rights of individuals, and the corporatism that is spawned out of the close ties between big government and big business during wartime. Michael Moore may not convince all audiences, but is successful for its factual accuracy in which the evidence spoke for itself, and at the same time proclaimed Moore's artistry in transposing and splicing scenes to create impressions that supported his allegations and opinions. Michael Moore has employed two main techniques in an

Paul Greengrass portrays all of this in a tasteful way without accusing anybody. Just like Manohla Dargis writes in his review of the movie: “Unlike Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 9/11,” the film doesn’t get into the whereabouts of the president that day, or why Osama Bin Laden ordered the attacks; its focus is purposely narrow.” It’s an objective view of what went on inside the plane and in the control towers. What happened inside the plane is fictive, but he still managed to give this movie the sense of realism.