Failure Of Nokia Essay

Nokia, which overtook Motorola in 1998 to take the crown of biggest phone manufacturer of world, lost its prestigious crown after struggling for last 3 years. The 4 costly mistakes that lead to Nokia losing the battle are described in this article. Nokia launched its Symbian 60 series in year 2002 which initially had a good market response but with the introduction of Apple iOS in 2007 and Android in 2008, the OS race was completely taken over by the two giants. The reasons for collapse of Symbian OS is lack of applications and UI (User Interface). After facing competition from iOS and Android, Nokia continuously tried to improve their Symbian OS but it was mostly following the UI of Android and iOS and was not creating something unique. Secondly, the company failed to look into the need of available applications in gaining market share. The company made the biggest mistake to take a leap of faith in Windows in 2011. At that point of time, the company already was in declining condition and trusting Windows which was new in the field to regain its status was the biggest mistake the company made. tiff competition from Samsung and Apple, and lack on focus on innovation was the second big reason of collapse. Even if users could ignore the OS, the the hardware features which Nokia was rolling out were quiet late as compared its major competitors Samsung and Apple.

However that in 2007 the market of Nokia Company started to decrease and the reasons for that is the new competitions like IPhone from Apple that introduced smartphones, along with Android by Google, and Samsung. Even though Nokia Company results for 2012 were pre much good by having 101982 workers across 120 countries along with sales in more than 150 countries, and the reports for revenue were around 30€ billion. Nokia was announced to be the second largest world for mobiles phone makers in terms of unit sales after Samsung, with having world wide market share 18.0%. However that Nokia Company for current days has 3.2% in smartphones and they lost 40% of their revenue in mobile phone in Q2 for 2013. Nokia was listed in fortune global 500 to be world’s 274 largest companies for 2013 from revenue sides. So Nokia Company has good products, services, and reputations. Knowing that their products are good and have nice services, yet comparing to others like Samsung and Apple they are weak because those provide an outstanding products and services which consist of smartphones. So Nokia want instead of providing a good services and products to become like their competition and provide an outstanding products and

In addition, companies such as apple and Google should not relax. As with Nokia in the mobile industry, these companies will lose their leadership position while acknowledging steps they can take to prolong their success. First, companies must continue to innovate and invention in order to improve the opportunities for the emergence of highly sophisticated technologies from within. Second, big companies should keep a track record for creators and big companies should work with innovative start-ups. Finally, successful companies must innovate continuously. They should not be afraid of imitation. If Nokia immediately develops its products like iPhone, it will not reach that

It established in 1871 and it is very old company. It was one of the biggest company in world in that time and it competition with other companies who is produce cell phone. The main product is cell phone. Nokia Company produce a lot types of mobile phone and different from other. There are phones with big screen and other with small screen. Also, they have phone with keyboard and other without it work by the touch. Also, Nokia Company provide other services which are internet services such as applications, music, digital media and messages. Nokia offers digital mapping and navigation

Threats: Nokia phones once dominated the phone market. However, it failed to see the threats from smartphone and the new phone manufacturer, and thus the brand Nokia faced serious strike and almost disappeared until recent.

Nokia’s aggressive strategy to dominate mobile communication cluster would be the main reason how Nokia could become a world leader in the sector among other reasons. Nokia’s passion for mobile communication industry was great enough to give up more than 40% of its revenue in is pre-owned communication industry to concentrate only in mobile communications. Nokia was also lucky enough to see the possibility of mobile communication early enough to predominate the industry and prevent any competition from

Nokia’s leadership engaged in actions which successfully guided the company in creating a new set of values

So, what can we learn from this unexpected incident of Nokia? It's simple. Any organization either a high profile one or an SMB, besides growing up in technology domain should make their own way in public domain. How? Nokia tried to be unique from the rest manufacturers and adopted Windows platform to express its

Even if users could ignore the OS, the the hardware features which Nokia was rolling out were quiet late as compared its major competitors Samsung and Apple. Nokia seemed to be lagging in the race. Where Samsung from nowhere entered the race and focused on innovation as its core competence to gain the market share, Nokia was very late to realize this fact. Samsung did everything right to focus only on product innovation and started competing with Apple in all product lines from smartphones to tablets, but Nokia failed to develop a focused device

The Finnish giant was sitting on its laurels and they have never thinking about improving continuously. They were only focusing on their internal strategies rather than on the customers, they failed to evolve and compete. This has led them to be decreased, after the smart phone industry become known and famous. This is an example of lack of evolution, even Sony, Motorola, Ericsson has failed due to lack of evolution. All these companies were at their prime, they have the technology, they have first mover advantage, but just because they didn’t continuously improve and neither did they evolve, they have been almost gone out of their industries and market

There did another mistake by overestimating the strength of its brand and they believed that we can easily capture the market of the smartphone even it late to the game. So many people says if the Nokia stuck to its own OS instead of using Windows Phone OS it could have succeeded. But the fact is they launched many disappointing mobile phones before they opted Windows Phone OS and the old operating system had already proven too buggy, clunky, and unintuitive to win consumers over. In 2008, Nokia said that it is the most valuable brands in the world, even though it is failed to recognize future trends.

From Nokia’s vision and mission statement it can be inferred that Nokia wants to be known for its credibility and to be a market leader again as it was before the year 2007 (Kess, 2014). Nokia understands that the company has to use innovation to offer products that are not yet

The main reasons behind the plummet of Nokia were due to lack of data concerning their competitors. The top level association had no data concerning how their competitor’s rank was that is IPhone. A researcher shouted Vuori said that top level association of Nokia got the wrong believed concerning the pace of progress that their competitor had and were managed to trust that the procedure that they were acting was adequate plenty to address to the menace that their competitor poses. So it is clearly described that due to their one unclear data they were drop dead. Journalist D. Bhatt (2001, page 68) quarels that “To capitalise on vision, an

In spite of the decrease in market share, Nokia has much room to grow with their newfound alliance with Microsoft (Microsoft News Center, 2011). The collaboration with Microsoft will be used as a leverage to entice students with the Windows 8 OS platform. Furthermore, an improved management to meet consumer demands, and increased promotional campaigns to increase brand awareness.

EV: Generally, the threat of substitutes is low in the smartphone industry as there are not definite products that can readily substitute the smartphone. Consumers rely heavily on Smartphone and would not be able to find a close substitute that has all the function of a mobile phone. Furthermore, Nokia is a long and established company with many loyal customers. These people may continue to stay faithful to Nokia and are hence less resistant to change. Also, the perceived level of product