Fair Debt Collection Law Violations

I made contact with Cantie's father, Arthur Cantie, per his request, via telephone. I advised Arthur of the situation and of Cantie's arrest. I also advised Arthur that Cantie had keys to a vehicle, and a wallet that bared the name "Arthur Cantie" in his possession. Arthur stated that Nathan took his vehicle from his residence, and he was requesting that I hold onto the vehicle's keys and his wallet. Arthur stated " I leave my wallet in my truck, that's probably why Nathan had it on him." Arthur further advised "Nathan has my phone, I'm speaking to you on it now." Arthur stated that he would call me back after he attempted to get a ride to Walmart so he could retrieve his truck, wallet, and cell phone. Shortly after, Arthur called me back and advised me that his son, Erik Cantie, was en route to retrieve his personal items.

CASE 1: John purchased a computer from Gateway, Inc. He noted upon starting it up that he had to agree to a number of provisions in the contract of purchase in order to continue his initial installation. The program indicated that if he did not wish to agree to the terms, he could return the computer to Gateway at Gateway's expense. One of the provisions requires that any disputes arising under the contract agreement be submitted to binding arbitration for a resolution.

Besides, another point have a place is If the administration takes your property for open utilize, they should remunerate you for it. In England or US property could be seized by the government without compensation to build a road or a bridge. The goal here is to ensure no one has their property taken by the government without being properly compensated, by using this law public ask for compensation. As the country's population continued to grow, however, local governments began to place increasing controls on the use of land. Where landowners believed that these restrictions impeded their use of the property, or damaged its value, they began to argue that these restrictions also constituted a taking of their land requiring adequate

Upon arrival I made contact with Gomez, Chery S. DOB 12/30/90, who related that she was involved in a verbal and physical confrontation with her neighbors. Chery further related that she borrowed her neighbor (Navarrete, Maria D. DOB 07/02/66) $30.00 USC sometime in September and has not been paid back. Chery related that Maria came to her in September and stated that she needed money ($100.00) to take her grandson to the hospital, but Chery only had $30.00 on her at the time. Chery further related that she did not want to make a big deal because it was a small amount of money. Chery related that she found out that Maria spent the money crack and this is the reason she wanted to collect the debt.

We are in a democratic society which has fair laws, but was it always this way. There have been laws for around 1750 B.C. which is around 4,000 years old, it was called Hammurabi’s Code. It consisted of 282 laws that were read in public regularly to make sure every citizen knew about the code.Because the laws were so new they didn’t have such a profound system of justice as we do in modern america.

Did Louie violate any of his obligations to the Sunshine Cab Company or to Tony? If so, explain.

James calls the number that is on the client’s file, and the person on the other end answers Annex Electric this is Andrea. At which point James says, this is James Wilson with Johnson Mental Health Center I am trying to reach John Jones regarding his Domestic Violence treatment. These actions are in violation of the American Counseling Association [ACA], 2014, B.1.b) as well as Colorado Statute 12-43-218(1). Later in the week as James is putting away some clients files the phone is ringing, so he sets the files down on a table where there are several new clients filling out paperwork. In this case James is careless with respect to client’s confidentiality by leaving clients records out where unauthorized persons can observe client’s information (ACA, 2014, B.6.b), (C.R.S. §§ 12-43-203(3), 12-43-222(1)(u)(d). Even though James has already placed client’s personal information at risk and broken client confidentiality up to this point other office workers told James not to tell anyone (C.R.S. §§ 12-43-224(9)(a)(b)). Although, James was under the agency supervisor and was required to have weekly meetings he primarily was answering to other staff members at the agency. When the supervisor did check in with James and asked other staff members how James was doing everyone reported he was doing a good job. Therefore, the

SC placed call to Pa and CG Annette on 01/5/16. SC asked Antoinette about her employment status with provider to be Sweet Home Health Care and she reported that she was still waiting to hear from the provider. SC informed Annette that it has been over 60 days since Pa’s was approved for service and has not us it. SC asked how Pa’s personal need is are being met and Antoinette reports that she is proving care to Pa. Annette said she did everything and is waiting for the agency. SC end call with Antoinette and placed call to agency. SC got the agency answering service and left detail message, identifying self, Pa, stated reason for calling, and contact informant.

The Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) provides borrowers with consumer rights and protections including the right to dispute inaccurate or incomplete information with the consumer-reporting agency or with the furnisher (Residential Credit Solutions, Inc.) directly. This law requires RCS to review the dispute including supporting evidence provided with the dispute. The furnisher must investigate the disputed information and provide its findings to the consumer-reporting agency or to the borrower.

Upon my arrival I met with the complainant identified as Travis L. Williams (03/12/78) and his employee Todd A.D Gowing (11/10/1990). Williams stated that starting in January of 2014, his business Ace Tech, received a large amount of phones via UPS that were not ordered by him or his employees. William stated that the boxes came under the name of Johnny Hash from the company named H20 Wireless. Williams stated that Hash also owns a business nearby and is using Williams address to receive the packages. Williams was able to return the phones through AT&T and get his money back, since he was also getting billed for the phones.

The reporting party (RP) stated she is the conservator for her nephew Michael McKinnon is not allowed to make or receive phone calls. According to the RP the facility staff members are to assist Michael to make a telephone call to his family every Sunday. The RP stated the facility staff refuse to assist Michael to use the phone. The RP stated the phone is located in the kitchen which is off limits to the residents. The RP stated she received a text from the facility stating that Michael is receiving a 30 day notice. The RP stated the facility is retaliating against Michael due to persistent involvement in his care. According to the RP the facility is doctoring and falsifying Michael's records in an attempt to justify the eviction. The RP stated

Next, employers should ensure that they practice saving good time and wage records in order to ensure that employees will be continually paid. Good records will satisfy most of the either employees or employers that may become involved in a disagreements including the Fair Work Ombudsman, court or tribunal that any errors were made in good faith.

On February 25, 2016, at 8.18 am a MCU member reached Senior Collections representative Brenda Castro and wanted to be service on a current account. Brenda Castro expressed that the Collections department would not be able to services his current account and instructed the member to call customer service. The members stated that he was already transferred from customer service and seem to be getting annoyed with Mrs. Castro and eventually requested to speak to a supervisor. There was a brief hold and Mrs. Brenda Castro returned to provide the supervisor number and the member called Brenda a Sir and the call went to unprofessionalism whereas the member used profanity and Brenda Castro retaliated with profanity. As an employed Mrs. Brenda Castro

Is the law really a fair way to regulate business activities or is it not fair? I don’t completely believe the law is fair even in business affairs. One example is the civil rights act of 1964, which in this act it says it applies to employers with more than 15 employees. So if an employer has 14 employees that employer could discriminate or do unlawful practices, but this is supposed to be fair. It’s seems like the less workers you have the more power you have over the law. The law is supposed to be or should be fair but it seems to only be equal in some situations and benefits some more others.

What did it take to convict Adnan Syed, the supposed murderer of his ex-girlfriend Hae Min Lee, was in reality nothing more than just non-solid theoretical speculations along with inconsistencies on the opposing side. Syed was up against (Attorney’s [or is it lawyer?] Name) and her client, Jay Wilds, who is your typical pothead drug dealer. Of course as it is in just about any other case both sides claim to be innocent of the murder, but only one was found guilty despite the fact that the other did still admit to aiding in the disposing of Hae’s still warm to the touch cadaver. The logical answer for the question “How do you convict someone with little evidence?” would be that you don’t, it isn’t possible to assess a person’s guilt or situation without any proof of said crimes to have been committed, it’s just preposterous. There is always the possibility that Adnan was unjustly accused of this crime because he was a main suspect and so this label was bestowed upon him and everyone seem to think he was indeed Hae’s demise. Just about every interview with Adnan’s fellow classman thought of him as good hearted, kind, and just not the type of guy to commit such an atrocity. Even so they were easily persuaded that he did it simply because he was on trial. How impertinent, you need a thesis statement.