Family Model And Structural Model

1321 Words6 Pages
In the focus of assessment, both the Bowen and Structural models suggest an essential concentration on evaluation. Then again, both models are somewhat dissimilar in the assessment methodologies. The similarities between the Bowen model and the Structural model suggest they both regard the family structural unit as a point in theory and generational processes. Additionally, both theoretical concepts search for patterns. For example, the Bowenian counseling approach explores the intricate patterns and interactions of intergenerational behaviors amongst the family (Bowen Center for the Study of Family, 2018). However, the Structural family model examines patterns like the Bowen model does as behaviors that are emotional or mental. Therefore, considering such indicators versus the patterns of those that are generational. Interestingly, counselors use a directive approach with their clients as well as having established a familial therapeutic alliance as well as with the family expansion, which applies in both models (Karam et al., 2015).
The differences that separate the Bowen Model from the Structural Model in assessment and practice is the control of the level of emotion. Whereas, Bowen suggests that family members do not speak to each other and talk directly to
…show more content…
Subsequently, a counselor determines the boundaries in part by assessing and accommodating the system. Observation of the family and the subsystem is essential if there is a need to diffuse boundaries if reactivity is high. A Structural Counselor will try to modify the current structure while gaining more insight as well as may choose to instigate further enactments. Thus, the counselor’s observation in evaluation and technique can lead the family to evolve in family structure (Nichols,
Get Access