Family Stressor-Strength Inventory (Fs3I) Essay

The 10 dimensions of Family Stress are a way to describe a family stressor. Lipman-Blumen created a list of 10 dimensions that family stressors are based on. These ten categories are: internal vs external, pervasive vs bounded, precipitate onset vs gradual onset, intense vs mild, transitory vs chronic, random vs expected, natural generation vs artificial generation, scarcity vs surplus, perceived insolvable vs perceived solvable, and substantive context. Some of these factors may seem obvious and others may not. Some may have a direct influence on the stressor and others may not. But, each of these can lead to a crisis if not taken seriously. For all of these categories, I think it all depends on the crisis and each situation.

Family Assessment The family chosen for this assignment are family friends who agreed to conduct the interview and discuss any health issues they had. Because some of the questions were fairly invasive into their private lives, no names are given. There are five members in the family, and they all participated in the interview. Questions are based on the eleven functional health patterns.

What are the short and long-term stressors impinging on this family? What strengths counterbalance these stressors? How is the family reacting to these stressors (identify functional and dysfunctional coping strategies)?

One psychosocial factor is the family’s socioeconomic status. Socioeconomic statuses has been researched to be on of the most influential factors in rather or not a family will succeed or face challenges, it can be a determinant in the development of mental health, physical health, and emotional health. A parent’s educational level, their occupation, and income could place the family in either a beneficial or hindering situation, in return, affecting the way a parent could establish attachment with their child. For example, a single parent raising their child and having to manage two jobs, could result in limited attachment to their parent or primary caregiver. Parental stress and their adverse childhood experiences is another psychosocial factor which can determine a child’s

The presentations opened my eyes to how diverse today’s family unit can be and provided me with an opportunity to gain a greater understanding of the diversity of the family unit in contemporary society. Often people have an image built on assumptions of the ideal family, however families are dynamic and for health professionals it is important to always reevaluate what is considered family and to challenge any assumptions made (Barnes & Rowe 2013). The Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011) found that in Australia, 15.9% of families were one parent families while 44.6% were couple families with children. On the contrary 37.8% were couple families without children. As a result of such diversity in the family unit, family strengths are continually growing and changing. It is important for nurses to be able to understand this in order to successfully undertake a comprehensive family assessment and identify and help develop those identified strengths to increase family resilience and facilitate change in family functioning (Smith & Ford

B., Baldwin, L. M., Bishop, D. S. (1983), Based on the McMaster Model of Family Functioning (MMFF), the FAD measures structural, organizational, and transactional characteristics of families. It consists of 6 scales that assess the 6 dimensions of the MMFF - affective involvement, affective responsiveness, behavioral control, communication, problem solving, and roles - as well as a 7th scale measuring general family functioning. The measure is comprised of 60 statements about a family; respondents (typically, all family members ages 12+) are asked to rate how well each statement describes their own family. The FAD is scored by adding the responses (1-4) for each scale and dividing by the number of items in each scale (6-12). Higher scores indicate worse levels of family functioning. The FAD has been widely used in both research and clinical practice. Uses include: (1) screening to identify families experiencing problems, (2) identifying specific domains in which families are experiencing problems, and (3) assessing change following treatment” (Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., Bishop, D. S.,1983). Epstein et al. (1983), noted that the FAD assessment has been found to have high levels of internal consistency across a variety of different types of families (Epstein et al.,

Family assessments can be complex and challenging because all families are found to be unique and so are the issues they encounter and the solutions they find (Holland, 2005). This essay will examine a case study that is mentioned within the appendix; and use theoretical models to formulate a bio-psychosocial assessment in the light of the family’s family life stage and provide a brief intervention. This essay will first state the presenting issues and then go onto formulating a bio psychosocial assessment and will draw learning from different theoretical frameworks such as the multidimensional approach; functional family therapy model, collaborative family work model, multigenerational family systems model to inform the assessment. Aspects of the theory and how they inform the assessment will be highlighted and risk and protective factors will be identified through the assessment. The essay will conclude with a brief intervention plan based on the assessment formulated and the theories used.

Ms. C. is a 57year old single female living with fiance. Using the Family Stressor System inventory (FS3I) she was able to identify multiple highly stressful area in her family. Even though she concerned with many of areas identified as highly stressful, she elected to focus on

One psychosocial factor is the family’s socioeconomic status. Socioeconomic statuses have been researched to be one of the most influential factors in rather or not a family will succeed or face challenges, it can be a determinant in the development of mental health, physical health, and emotional health. A parent’s educational level, their occupation, and income could place the family in either a beneficial or hindering situation, in return, affecting the way a parent could establish attachment with their child. For example, a single parent raising their child and having to manage two jobs, could result in limited attachment to their parent or primary caregiver. Parental stress and their possible experiences of adverse childhood

The Psychosocial Family Tree assessment requires the input of known, important characteristics of family members. It strives to get a better understanding of an individual’s psychological development by analyzing certain characteristics that the individual’s family members have. The individual fills out the assessment to the best of their abilities, including characteristics of the big five factors, occupation, education, etc. This assessment uses the L-Data approach and the qualitative method. The reliability, validity, and generalizability of the assessment are evaluated to conclude the degree of effectiveness. The results concluded that the Psychosocial Family Tree is low in reliability, moderate in construct validity, and low in generalization. The findings provide an insight to an individual’s personality and awareness to specific patterns of behaviors or characteristics.

This research paper evaluates the Bowen Family Systems Theory and its impact on the practices of Marriage and Family Counseling. Dr. Murray Bowen is credited with being one of the founders of family systems theory. This paper will discuss the eight concepts which Bowen deemed causes anxiety within the family system. Also, the goals and practices which have been utilized by professionals within the psychology field relation to the Bowen Family Systems Theory. Analysis provides that anxiety is passed along through the family system by the triangle concept and when families are dysfunctional there are several outcomes based upon the concepts developed by Dr. Bowen. The therapeutic structure which is developed by Bowen allows clients to help themselves and lower levels of anxiety over time.

Family is the basic unit of society. A family is a set of interacting individuals related by blood, marriage, cohabitation, or adoption who interdependently perform relevant functions by fulfilling expected roles. Health practices are those activities performed by individuals or families as a whole to promote health and prevent diseases. The relationship between members of family influences the understanding of behavior, which is demonstrated in family’s structural, functional, communicational, and developmental patterns (American Academy of Pediatrics, 2003; Bonell et al., 2003).Within families, children and adults are nurtured and taught about health values by word and by example, and it is within families that

The FACE III assessment is divided into two main parts, and each part subdivides into 20 questions related to Cohesion and Adaptability in the Family. All answers are asked to be numbered from 1 to 5 with 5 indicating ‘ALMOST ALWAYS’ while 1 indicated ‘ALMOST NEVER’. The first part of the assessment included questions that DESCRIBE the family environment and structure in terms of Cohesion and Adaptability, while the second part of the assessment contained the same questions but the respondent is asked to answer as to how the IDEAL family would be for him. The structure of the FACE III is similar to that of SFI. FAD on the other hand, contains 53 unit questions which fall into 7 categories Problem Solving, Communication, Roles, Affective Responsiveness, Affective Involvement, Behavior Control, and General Family Functioning. The answers ranged from Strongly Agree, which was represented with number 4, to Strongly Disagree which was represented with number 1.

Relationship was established to build trust and compliance, followed by assessment of the family type and structure. Functional family assessment evaluates how individuals behave towards one another, looking at the here and now of the family relations (Wright & Leahey (2009). The interview was conducted and findings were used in developing plan of care based on family function and coping ability in relation to health and wellness.

Coping-Stress Tolerance Pattern: Flora’s family cope with stressful life events in two ways: being involved in any Christian activities (praying to God, attending church, etc.) and speaking with family, friends, and the church pastor for consolation. The family has no history of chemical abuse such as alcohol and drugs. The strength the family has to help counterbalance any stress is having strong support systems through church, work, community, and extended family. One common major stressful family situation is constant flooding at their current home that results in frequent power outages and destruction of household valuables due to hurricanes and heavy rainstorms; this happens about two or three times a year. The family sees stress and children’s health and development as separate. Stress is more of an individual concern and children’s health and development is more of a family concern which involves, for example, annual physicals. The family makes appraisals of a stressor by praying to God for things to get better which is realistic because it is part of a Christian custom to have a spiritual communication with God. The family resources consist of having an emergency life fund, a separate bank account untouched unless a traumatic event occurs, cars, computer access, phone service, etc. Due to the rise in technology, the family is able to link with other family or community resources through computer via social media,