The population of Markham has been growing at a steady rate of around 30000 people every 5 years. Due to this the farmland in markham has started a massive debate on whether to use it for natural farming or as land for commercial areas and housing developments for the extra people. The farmland has been stated to be prime farmland. The air quality in Markham has been good and healthy and with the new commercial areas, the air could get worse and worse leaving the air unhealthy and polluted. Southern ontario right now has the most farmland lost already(Algie). With this in fact southern ontario doesn’t have much farmland to spare. Also if the farmland gets converted, the food that comes from the farms will be gone and people will have to …show more content…
If the buildings go up, the pollution will affect the environment dramatically. Farms have lots of plants and greenspace which help the environment. The plants feed the wildlife and help make the area and the air cleaner. If the farmland gets converted, garbage will increase tremendously. The garbage will either blow away increasing litter thus polluting the area and the water, or will end up in the already overflowing landfills. In addition the animals will have to drink the contaminated water and will have to change the routes they usually walk to avoid the traffic and people. Also without the plants keeping the air clean the extra cars and air pollutants will make the air worse and unhealthy to breathe, therefore increasing the risk of diseases and asthma(difference betweeninfo). In conclusion the conversion of farmland to housing and commercial areas will have a immense effect on the …show more content…
Local farm food is usually cheaper since your not paying for the packaging and the shipping across the country. Also the food is way fresher and healthier for consumption since it is freshly grown and has not been sitting on a shelf for days. In addition the farmers that live on the farm are used to the quiet area of the farm and using the farm as their income source. By converting the land it means the farmers and their families will lose their homes and will need to adapt to the noisy and dense areas and in addition they will need to find a new job. Also some farms have been in families for generations and will break their hearts to sell it. In conclusion the conversion of farmland into commercial areas will affect the economy and innocent
In his paper, Pollan discusses the reliance on fossil fuels for agriculture, public health issues, and food security problems. He proposes policy that promotes alternative, local farming. Lyson describes a shift from craft to mass production, the consolidation of farms, and the disembedding of agriculture from the community. He discusses how civic economies challenge the market based agriculture system. Kloppenburg discusses how our current foodshed is built on a market economy and distances people from their food sources. Berry describes the problems of land consolidation, the industrialization of agriculture, and a culture of distancing people from farms. He proposes instituting more community based food systems. Although these authors discuss important economic, social, and environmental problems
Katherine Spriggs, the author of the essay “On Buying Local,” speculates on the controversial issue of small farms versus industrial farms. There are various opinions regarding this, and she covers many angles of the argument. While reading her essay, you can definitely tell which type of farm she is in favor for, though she does acknowledge the other side and mention counter arguments respectfully. Her thesis was very clear in stating “We should not give up a little bit of convenience in favor of buying local” (Spriggs 92). She then gives us many main points thereafter and proves them with data. Spriggs uses the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, and logos to effectively argue that buying local and supporting small farm is the best option
Besides the environmental factors, another point would be that small farms benefit greatly when consumers buy locally grown foods. Small, locally owned farms
Eighty to ninety percent of the population needs to be vaccinated to prevent the potential spread of a disease (percent depends on the infectiousness of the disease). Another valid reason to vaccinate oneself is to create a secure blanket of immune people to protect the unfortunate individuals without the choice of becoming vaccinated. The strategy of protecting others who have not received vaccinations is called herd immunity, which is a more essential reason to become vaccinated compared to only protecting oneself. Those who cannot receive vaccinations are people that have severe allergic reactions to the preservatives in vaccines and younger children. In a Ted Talk, Romina Libster explains the importance of herd immunity, “People who are
It relies heavily on expensive fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. The cost of food could be significantly lower with the reduction of monocropping. Monocropping increases the cost of food by having a large area of land producing only one type of crop, this means that only that crop will be readily available in that area and all other produce will have to be shipped in. Monocropping is beneficial for the farmers growing heavily subsidized crops like corn, wheat, or soy. Farmers are able to turn a profit on commodity crops, no matter how much is bought and what price the crop is sold for. Farm subsidies are known to benefit the larger farms the most. Agricultural subsides inflate the price of farmland. Most US citizens don't see the true cost of their food, from 1995 to 2012 the US Government spent $18,563,609,563 on corn subsidies. The Government has spent $9,508,633,852 on wheat subsidies and $8,179,977,437 on soybeans. From 1995-2012 there has been $57,592,341,340 spend on food subsidies and there has been 35,789,071 policies passed regarding food subsides. The US population was 361.1 million people in 2012, in order to pay for the cost of the food subsides each person would need to pay $182.20, that number includes unemployed individuals, children, and those below the poverty line. In addition to the ludicrous amount of tax dollars spent on farm
Farmlands are being lost for the creation of new highways, fringe industrial parks and sprawl housing developments. The loss of farmland would minimize our capability to grow fiber and food. The increase in property tax due to the pressure of urban development has forced farmer to lose their business. They inevitably have to sell their farmland for different type of housing development. U.S. Census of Agriculture reported a decline in farmland acres from about 938.3 million in 2002 to about 922.1 million in 2007, a loss of 1.7 percent. The loss of farmland would reduce the quality and quantity of food supply due to the possible shortcoming
The third trimester is usually the period between the 27-40th week of pregnancy. During this period there are many developmental changes in both the fetus and the expectant mother (Nilsson & Lemberger 2009). As the fetus grows and covers the abdominal cavity of the mother, the mother has a feeling of discomfort as she is anxious for the expected child. On the hand the fetus during this period the lungs mature and begin to positions its head-down. It can see and hear as the brain is also developing.
For example, many argue that it will benefit the economy and lead to an increase in jobs. However, this could not be further from the truth. In fact, research has shown that not only will one worker replace three in the way of jobs on the farm, but it will eventually decrease property values. Towns are primarily funded by property taxes, and this will therefore hurt the economy.
Due to the high land the temperatures are low, this means that the growing season is short so arable farming is not possible. There are high amounts of rainfall due to the altitude, resulting in relief rainfall, and also the low pressure systems which are brought in over the Atlantic. The high precipitation waterlogs the soil and washes away the nutrients- leaving the soil infertile. Furthermore, the steep hill sides of U-shape Valleys and pyramidal peaks are not suitable for machinery or cultivation.
Factory farming allows food to be delivered around the world. Ogle, Maureen. Factory Farmers earn more of a profit than regular farmers, because they can kill and ship their animals faster. Because food has become cheaper to process and produce, farm owners can make some investments in raising and growing more varieties of livestock and plants than before.“List of Top 19 Factory Farming Pros and Cons. Factory farming is less dependent on human labor. Which does not lead to less employment because someone has to take care of the machines. Factory farming uses modern technology, so it has freed farmers from manual labor constraints. Now, willing laborers will only be picked for tasks that really require them, while a few individuals just use machinery to do more than their hands can ever could.“List of Top 19 Factory Farming Pros and
Land Pollution can have detrimental effects on soil and the health of organisms. It can be described as the destruction of Earth’s land surface through misue of land resources. It occurs when waste is not properly disposed of or when humans use chemicals such as pesticides and fertilizers. Solid waste can also cause land pollution. Landfills are a prime example of this because waste is deposited there and will not decompose for thousands of years constantly polluting the land. The carrying capacity of some ecosystems has been lowered because of land pollution. The industrial revolution is really what gave rise to the major increase in land pollution and ever since habitats have been destroyed and environments have been polluted. Land Pollution can cause various types of cancers, human respiratory problems, and skin problems. There are currently 3,091 active landfills in the United States.
We can save energy by purchasing locally grown and produced foods. The energy used to transport foods from all over the world is extremely high. By buying locally, we can save fuel, as well as help out our community economically. Eating local means, more money stays within our community. Every dollar spent generates twice as much income for the local economy. Local produce is fresher and tastes better because it is usually sold within 24 hours of being picked. If we buy produce at a conventional grocery store, it may have been kept in storage for days or weeks. When we buy
Farm to table can keep the environment clean. Taking food on long distances, “Eating local food benefits the environment by reducing the pollution caused by transporting food over long distances” (“Local Food Movement: Should people attempt to eat locally produced food?”). Additionally, If we could get the U.S. to be all locally grown, the environment would stay clean for the plants and animals. If we can keep the environment without pollution, the land
Another disadvantage to urbanisation is that it has a negative impact on the natural environment. Acres and acres of land has to be cleared to construct new infrastructure and this may lead to serious consequences. Such include increase risk of floods because the concrete in urban areas reduces infiltration to zero. The expansion of urban areas puts pressure on the natural habitats of certain indigenous and endemic animal and plant species. This may cause the extinction of entire biomes and ecosystems putting at risk the possible mass extinction of humans if the there are no regulations implemented during the process of urbanisation. Another disadvantage includes air and water pollution which stem from factories and other manufacturing
o Paving open space and converting farmland to commercial and residential development reduces our capacity to produce food products, decreasing food availability and increasing food prices throughout the world.