Question 1 (A) Fast Ed has three choices after the realisation under the Section 70-45 of ITAA 1997, to value his stocks. (1) Cost (2) Market selling price (3) Replacement value. (I.). Cost: According to the commissioner Ruling TR 2006/8, Fast Ed is a retailer and he ought to embrace Cost to be controlled by the present applicable bookkeeping practices (Philip Morris Ltd v FCT (1979) 10 ATR 44. Fast Ed is a retailer according to Commissioner Ruling TR 2006/8; he needs to embrace 'absorption cost strategy'. It will incorporate immediate and roundabout expense brought about in brining thing to present area, moulding and offering costs. Diction of Purchase is engaged at market value according to the S 70-20 of ITAA 1997. (2). Market selling …show more content…
Replacement value is the amount that should be spend on the replacement of the product and that amount would be appropriate to that product (Parfew Nominees Pty Ltd v FCT (1986) 17 ATR 1017). Question 1 (b). Car that Fast Ed gave to Slick Sam has the market value of $19,000 and the car’s actual cost to fast Ed was $17,000 which he exchanged for a obligation of %18,000 which he owned to Slick Sam and that transaction will be assessable as independent business income under (s 6-5 of ATAA 1997). In that event if the transaction is not the arm’s length, then the amount to compute assessable pay will be market value (S 70-20). As the market value was $19,000 thus the income will be $2000 to be incorporated as the business Income. The salary from exchange will be assessable when Fast Ed gave the auto to the Slick Sam. Question 1 (C). Fast Ed owns the car and exchanges it. Fast Ed purchased the car for $19,000 is an obtaining of exchanging stock in the customary course of business and is along these lines deductible under SS 8-1 and 70-15. Fast Ed took the car home for his daughter and she was using that car for personal use which is then became unavailable for trading and Fast Ed have discarded it for expense under Section 70-110. Under (Section 70-20), Fast Ed must incorporate $21,000 in his assessable income for that
Since the business does not have enough funds to continue paying its long-term financial obligations, as repayment of debt Angela has decided to exchange Wheeler’s accounts receivable for an $80,000 corporate note payable by the corporation. The remaining assets will be distributed to Angela and she will assume personal liability for the other accounts payable. Furthermore, Wheeler will distribute the real property to Angela, who will assume personal liability for the
Since the business does not have enough funds to continue paying its long-term financial obligations, as repayment of debt Angela has decided to exchange Wheeler’s accounts receivable for an $80,000 corporate note payable by the corporation. The remaining assets will be distributed to Angela and she will assume personal liability for the other accounts payable. Furthermore, Wheeler will distribute the real property to Angela who will assume personal liability for the repayment of the mortgage.
c. How could the transaction be structured a different way to get a better result for
Date: Name: ID: Answer the following Questions: 1. Tower Inc. owns 30% of Yale Co. and applies the equity method. During the current year, Tower bought inventory costing $66,000 and then sold it to Yale for $120,000. At year-end, only $24,000 of merchandise was still being held by Yale. What amount of inter-company inventory profit must be deferred by Tower? A. $6,480 B. $3,240 C. $10,800 D. $16,200 E. $6,610 2. All of the following statements regarding the investment account using the equity method are true except A. The investment is recorded at cost B. Dividends received are reported as revenue C. Net income of investee increases the investment account D. Dividends received reduce the investment account E.
7. Though numbers given in the cost data can not be contested, I would definitely contest the way total cost has been computed. The item 345 department operates within a large manufacturing facility that churns out number of other products too. Hence judging the profitability of item 345 on the basis of total cost is not practical.
The action connected to the first draw of Buck and following payments must be made on a gross foundation inside the investing action part as $70 million influx for the draw, July 30, 210. The action related the second draw made by Buck and resulting payment might be made on basis net inside the financing operation part. The $15 draw on Sept 30, 2010 and the decompensating first of December 2010 net to zero for yearly commentary reasons. The draws in the third scenario just again show some of the traits inside the flow of cash statement procedure. This transaction may be regarded vast in
The costing approach should be based on per Transaction Basis rather than on per kit or per pound basis because of the following reasons:
With the use of Traditional Absorption Costing (TAC) which means Wilkerson Company is now only put the costing of direct labor and material in place. As we can
It is determined that the company worth is $856,518 with a share price of $351.03 per value as per the discounting dividend cash flow valuation approach..In appraising the anticipated premerger performance of the company, the weighted average cost of capital is computed; the worth of the WACC for FVC is 9.2% as depicted in
The management of FedEx gives particular emphasis on the initial purchasing and installation cost of new systems. In line with this, the firm's top managers are supposed to explain LCC of various solutions prior to the installation of new equipment. The initiation of strong LCC is essential in assisting FedEx achieve high financial strategies in the competitive market. Therefore, to maintain a competitive edge, the organization constantly initiates cost savings to improve its profitability (Hsu, 2012).
The most important is Enterprise value/EBIDTA. Helps to estimate the offer of KKR, inc and gives the answer to Question N4. (See the following table)
If the company decided to sell the new product at price of D.Cr. 8.20, that means the full fixed expense of 1.20 is covered and the company will make high profit. However, the selling price of D.Cr. 8.20 is very high and under this price the company will sell the new product at a lower volume than what the company planned sale volume in the budget and that will affect the company in the market as a strong competitor in the food manufacturing. According to the case, the company sales volume drop to 30 tons when the product was sold at the price of D.Cr. 8.2. Thus, my recommendation are as follows:
13. Janfer Book Store purchased a new automobile that cost $10,000, made a down payment of $3,000, and signed a note payable for the balance. The entry to record this transaction is:
First, we have identified if there is really an insufficiency in the amount of selling prices set by the Sales Department, in reference to Exhibit 1 of the case. We did this through identifying the maximum amount of overhead costs that the company can incur for the three products and comparing it with the total overhead costs. See Table 1 for details.
As our ultimate goal is to make a decision about whether it is worthwhile for us to make an investment on SHXS’s equity, we need to estimate the fair value of SHXS’s equity first by adopting our estimation of this company’s required rate of return (‘E(r)’), which is 38.7%, and then compare our result with SHXS’s IPO offer for ‘H’ shares, which is HKD1.46 per share.