Fast Food : A Policy Guide For Healthier Kids And Families

Food industries trick he/she into buying their food by using words that sound healthier. Words like ''natural'' sound better, but natural is still a chemical made in a lab. Fast foods are not completely honest with the ingredients they use. We eat foods that say fat-free but fat hasn't been the problem with weight gain; it is sugar. Food Industries use more sugar or sweetener to make food taste better when they remove fat. The fat-free product causes the consumer to eat more because he or she may think it is ok too, but it is far worse to eat. Eating so much sugar can lead to high blood pressure and more health problems. The dangers of fast food can lead to significant weight gain, health problems, and more money spendings.

In America almost two thirds of the nation is overweight. That is about 79.6 million people who are obese. Fast food is without a doubt the problem why these statistics are so high. According to Shannon Brownlee, a journalist for the Sacramento Bee “ It’s Portion Distortion That Makes America Fat” she mentions how fast food corporations are luring buyers into their offers . In another article by David Weintraub “The Battle Against Fast Food Begins in the Home” he focus more on self responsibility rather than fast food restaurants being convenient everywhere you go. In America, the obesity epidemic is caused by the lack of parent not taking full responsibility for their childrens health, as well as fast food industries distorting portion sizes in order to make more

The Fast Food and Childhood Obesity article discuss how fast food has contributed for the weight gained by childrens. According to the article Americans are eating out more, which has influenced on the children gaining weight, but the weight gained by children are significantly weight from fast food calories. Childrens from twelve to nineteen years old are more likely to eat fast food and the reason for that could be because at this age they get influenced more by what they see on tv, commercial and their parents do not have a lot of control on what their children's eat. This article states encourage people to their meals at home because home cooked food tends to be smaller and healthier. I can use this article to help with my research paper

From reading all five articles, the one I would have to agree with the most would be, “The Battle Against Fast Food Begins in the Home,” by Daniel Weintraub. Weintraub stated that if we are looking for someone to blame about our child obesity rate increasing in extreme amounts and our exercising rate decreasing, we should blame the guardians of the kids. To be more specific, if you have obese children, stop blaming them about their problem. Start to blame yourself. You are the cause to their problem by not teaching them that eating healthy is super important.

As the Obesity rate in America is steadily increasing, people will continue to point fingers right at the fast food industries, but is that who really to blame or is it your parents for poor food choices(Weintraub)? Parents are a huge role in their child’s life and if you just let your children sit on the couch all day play on the computer, they will end up nowhere in life that is just my opinion. Research says 30 percent of our country’s residents are overweight, which means people are still not being healthy that’s when parents need to take matters into their own hands and buy actual food and not be cheap go fast food all the time(Sloviter). Also type 1 and 2 diabetes are at record highs and still rising at some point will be at a state

Childhood obesity had become an epidemic of national attention. Research after research has shown us frightening evidence about the health risk facing America’s Children. This dilemma cannot be solved without extensive action. The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2012 is a piece of legislation, signed by President Barack Obama, which aims to conflict the overwhelming epidemic that touching the entire nation. Many conservatives argue this act and would like to withdraw the legislation, believing that it is not the appropriate way to go about administering the problem.

However, despite the successes, the NSLP is also known for inducing blame and stigmatization to its students. According to the SNDA, only 35% of schools meet with the SMI recommended calories. However, the NSLP instead of recognizing that schools are not meeting with the recommended intake because of its overconsumption of commodities, they blame the students and the schools for the lack of healthful practices. For example, Allen and Guttmann (2002) in Neoliberalization from the ground up states how the introduction of the wellness policy under the NSLP recognizes that schools are faulty for nutritional goals and that it should be their role to prevent childhood obesity and other health problems (Allen& Guttmann, 2002) Finally, in his article Competitive Foods, Discrimination and Participating in the National School Lunch Program, Rajiv Bhatia(2011) mentions how the NSLP fails to provide neutral quality services by making the program inaccessible to low income students. According to a 2009 national survey, despite that many schools are eligible for free lunches, only 30% of US schools had participation rates under 25% and only 10% have participates rates of 14% (Bhatia, 2011). In other words, according to Bhatia (2011), despite that many students are eligible for free meals, many are refusing to eat because of their fear of being stigmatized. Having said this, the NSLP fails to meet with the goals of the welfare state. Even though, the NSLP meets with certain goals such as

In the article the “ The Battle Against Fast Food Begins At Home “ the author, Daniel Weintraub believes that the problem with obesity is the parents fault. The fast food industry are not the main culprit here. He supports these claims by showing statistics and data from studies done by scientists. He shows that if parents take action the restaurants can’t stop them. This is clear through the adults that take action and the ones who don’t.

Childhood obesity has more than doubled in children and quadrupled in adolescents in the past 30 years (cdc.gov). Clearly there is a large issue in America that needs to be addressed by smart and careful thought out action by the American leadership. In 2012, more than 1 out of 3 children were considered overweight or obese (cdc.gov). The Healthy-Hunger Free Kids Act was passed by President Obama in 2010 (fns.usda.gov). This was an act that would force schools to serve healthy lunches in an attempt to reduce the issue of childhood obesity. Americans should have the right to choose what food they eat and the lifestyles they choose regardless of the impact on their health.

I think most of us remember the annual school bake sale. Our mothers would whip up the most delicious cupcakes (using grandma’s secret recipe.) A fun time to enjoy tasty treats and maybe make a little money for the school while you were at it. Homemade goodies are just better than store-bought ones and I think everyone can agree. Food made with love just has that “something special” that makes you crave it even years after the sweet taste has long since faded away. Times were simpler then.

The position of the business is an integral component to its success as the location can either make or break the business.

Americans eat too much fast food which is high in salt, sugar and fat. Scientists say that children born today can die before their parents because of eating unhealthy foods. Why Americans eat that way because they think healthy foods are more expensive than packaged foods and healthy foods take longer time to prepare. How can Americans make their diet better? They can stop eating fast foods and eat healthier foods and also have a piece of fruit for snack during the day.

country alone, 17% of all children and adolescents are now obese, triple the rate from

Fast food, the highly addictive food that many people can not go a day without eating. In our society today fast food has become the “norm” when we are looking for something to eat, causing our society to accept it as something to be eaten ALL the time. Fast food can affect our bodies more than most people comprehend. According to the United States Healthful Food Council, they say 8 out of 10 people eat fast food monthly and half say they even eat it weekly. By ingesting these large amounts of fatty, salty, and sweet foods, children and adults are becoming increasingly obese. Fast food causes long term negative health effects and is a direct contributor to America 's increasing obesity problems.

The relevance of this issue has brought to discussion particularly striking features that fall within the type of industry that is being analyzed, for example Ramirez and Hauser (1996) indicate that the location has a more flexible character only when the industry has high levels of innovation and technology, using the case of manufacturing. However, the location theory rests on two pillars: the proximity to consumers and proximity to suppliers who seek to minimize transportation costs and cover a spatial dimension wider than its competitors (Caloca, Cardenas Ortiz,