Fast Food Failing Grades

Schools do a “good” job in promoting certain healthy foods in their cafeterias. Yes, students do not enjoy eating them but it is for their good. The fact that schools sell the “baked” chips is a good and a bad idea. It is a good idea because they are healthier than the regular chips sold in grocery stores and smaller than regular sizes. The bad part comes to the fact that they are still being sold and most students prefer to purchase them instead of fruits. In my case, I know I would prefer to eat those chips instead of the fruits. Vending machines are rarely seen in schools but the schools that do have them do not have healthy items inside. Sodas and junk snacks are what are mostly seen in those vending machines along with others. Students

In the article Should Candy and Soda be Banned from Schools the writer of this article shows the both sides of whether candy and soda should be banned from schools or not.I agree with the writer that candy and soda should be banned from schools because it is our first step in stopping obesity in our nation. The reason in why I agree with the writer is because that our generation is known to be overweight or even obese, but if we can switch out the unhealthy food and bring in healthier food we can stop obesity before it even happens.

The soda is the problem because it carries more calories than chips. If schools just limited the supplies of any type of soda the obesity rate at school may seem to be different. Now, the candy would just be a little problem because candy would be an addictive source for students since it is so chewy,muchy, and sour. The candy could be addictive meaning students would want more leading to more calories but, banning it won’t change because students want their candy to buy, sell, fundraise, or eat. Candy and soda cannot be banned because if schools are teaching them healthy diets, healthy food to eat, and nutrition this all falls back on the students. The banning of candy won’t stop obesity it will just make it worse for students rebel against the

With the incidence of childhood obesity, type 2 diabetes, and heart disease continuing to climb, it is understandable that concerned individuals searching for effective methods of reversing this trend would target school lunches. Children consume up to half of their daily calories during school, but the government has not yet placed any limitations on the sugar content of their meals. When viewed generally, the implementation of restrictions on the amount of sugar in school meals appears to be the universal solution to combatting childhood health problems, but in practice it cannot be feasibly implemented in Alaska’s Kenai Peninsula Borough School District. Although sugar is a major factor contributing to the declining health of the adolescent

High-sugar foods should be sold in high school bending machines. People come in all shapes and sizes. A decision based on unhealthy kids is not a fair punishment for everyone. It’s the people money, if they want snacks they shouldn’t be forced to buy fat free foods. Not everyone wants to lose weight. High-sugar foods should be sold in high school bending machines because a decision based just on unhealthy kids is unfair, it’s the kid’s money they should be able to buy what they want, and not everyone wants to lose weight.

Although there are many students that have diabetes eating disorders through the United states school lunches are the most well fed for many children around the world. Many around do not have dinner on the table for of children low fat foods are being place in many school lunches they should not be in the Cafeteria.

Eating too much junk food is a problem for many Americans. Currently, 9.3 percent are diabetic, while 35.7 percent of Americans are obese ("Statistics About Diabetes") ("Overweight and Obesity Statistics"). Even more Americans could become diabetic in the future because obesity is known to cause it. “If Americans keep getting heavier at the current rate, 42% of the population will be obese by 2030,” according to Alexandra Sifferlin, in a TIME article. The government should raise taxes on candy and other fatty snacks to help decrease obesity and the number of diabetic people. Decreasing these two health problems would lessen the amount of money needed for health insurance. In addition, willpower is an issue for many people and if a bag of potato

Kids/teens are getting diagnosed with diabetes every day. Some even end up obese and get bullied about it. I wouldn’t like a life like that. School lunch isn’t really helping out on that situation either. They’re feeding us things that are harming us, just so that they can make money. And it’s wrong! I think that school lunches should be healthier, and it should mean something to the people that we’re getting obese or diabetes. It is their fault we the young generation end up like this. School lunches are a hazard for us, later in our lives we’ll struggle to lose weight. And not just that but some diabetes can kill us, like type 2 diabetes. Oh and no one wants to be made fun of their whole lives, for being overweight. Then there’s the other

Everyone loves sugar filled snacks, especially children. A kid’s day can be made so much better just by handing them their favorite candy bar. This is something students looked forward to during their school day. Sadly, this was made to change. Schools started banning snacks, and drinks based on their unhealthy effect they have on individuals. According to Beverly Ballaro and Ann Griswold in "Junk Food in Schools: An Overview,” this change occurred when Michelle Obama launched her project for healthy eating in 2010. Let’s Move! Was her way to fix child obesity in America. This directed schools to feed children healthier options, and twice as many vegetables or fruit. This was not a necessity for public schools across the United States. Students should not be limited to what they eat in school. As long as they are being fed their basic lunch, it should not be important what they decide to snack on.

One reason junk food should not be banned is because students have the right to choose. Some people believe junk food should be banned because they believe junk food causes childhood obesity. On the contrary, this is false because the article “Junk Food Should Be Banned in Schools” says that its up to parents to decide what food their children can eat (Dunham 2). This proves that a parent’s input is more powerful that the school’s ability to influence student behavior. Also, in the Article Junk Food Should Be Banned in Schools “If children want to include a bit of junk in their lunches they should be allowed to do so” (Dunham 1). This quote explains that students will attempt to smuggle in junk food even if it is banned. This same article says, “Enforcing such a ban would force school officials to dig through lunchboxes. Lockers and desks. This would harm student’s privacy” (Dunham 1). This is important because compromising student privacy is not worth the trouble of monitoring the intake of junk food.

spread over the US and thanks to all the Chips and sodas in school . Schools

One of them involves the fact that it can cause obesity. The part of the article that was saying yes on banning was really having a thorough thought on having these sweets can cause more obesity. It was also stating that one third of America’s children are either overweight or obese. Another fact that this article had mention is that when teenageres are obese as teens 80% of those teen remain obese as adults. They also stated that eating foods like these can also cause more than just obesity. It may cause certain cancers, and chronic diseases like diabetes, heart disease, asthma, and high blood pressure. But what they proposed on what the government should do instead to change these horrific facts is changing what kids eat at schools. Since that is where many kids eat half of their daily calories. I really agreed with this statement because I can relate. I know that my school serves really fat and greasy foods that are bad for the body. As it has really affected me in my sports activity. When I eat something fattening from the cafeteria at my school, I later have little energy when I am at baseball practice. But on the contrary when I eat something healthy like a salad I don’t feel as bad as I do when I eat something unhealthy and

Sugary drinks have been a part of people’s daily routine. These beverages such as soft drinks, fruit-flavored drinks, and coffee have are convenient in a person’s life. The argument for banning sugar drinks in schools is absurd because it is unfair for students.

Junk food, junk food, junk food is around all corners of schools. Chocolate, cookies, soda, potato chips, and Sour Strings may sound delectable to some people, but are they nutritious? Some people wonder if there should be a change. Encouraging exceptional nutrition in schools is essential by reasons of students will consume foods that are better for them, schools will pay less for meals, and fewer students would go hungry.

Many people in today 's generation are constantly are craving junk food. It is patently evident junk food plays a major role in the cause of obesity. According to a study called "Psychological science", Obesity leads to numerous health issues including heart disease, high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes. The treatment of these health issues cost billions of tax health dollars (Physiological science, 2014). Permitting junk food in schools will cause greater chances of obesity. Students will be heading on a venture. Furthermore, obesity is a continuous major problem since the past several years. In 2010, a 4 year old girl named