Features of a Good Literature Review

There are several ways that students can avoid plagiarism. The best way is to be informed

Review the scholarly literature within the field of your program specialization related to your proposed (or School-approved) dissertation topic. Analyze the reviewed literature to determine what is already known about your proposed (or School-approved) dissertation topic and what remains unknown. Synthesize your findings and evaluate how a study on your proposed (or School-approved) dissertation topic could be designed to advance the scholarly research in this area while maintaining ethical research requirements.

The way I plan on conducting research is through a literary analysis, as I am a high school student with very few resources to gather large amounts of primary data. The types of literature that will be in this paper will include studies, meta-analysis, news articles, and magazine articles. By gathering this information, I will be more equipped to conduct more intensive research in the

Once the topic is selected I started finding the relevant sources. Before writing the research paper I was not sure how to find out the resources and citing them through this paper I learned how to get the information correctly form the scholarly review and present them in the paper. Once I find the source I need to evaluate the ideas made in that article or book. This helps me to understand and evaluate the ideas made according to the author. It improve my reading skills and noting the main ideas of the author. It helps me to get ideas for my research paper and it is not useful only for now but in the future

Critical - You need to think and write critically express what a piece of literature means.

Using the techniques discussed in the writing textbook and in class, summarize this article. Your summary should include only critical ideas from the passage, not your own opinion or ideas. Here are things that I will be looking for as I grade the summary:

___V. Uses, Value, Strengths, Weaknesses, Professional Commentary in literature - The primary goal of this study was

The primary audience for this are Academic scholars. This type of academic literature is well referenced and used information from scientific points of view and also political views, it argues both points of the topic where it’s not biased towards a certain point of view.

Overall: Overall, I think this literature review is good. I think the most important thing is adding a conclusion to end the literature review more effectively. On than that, I only have a few comments. The first sentence is slightly awkward; it could be fixed by reducing “such as the one argued by Aristotle” to “such as Aristotle.” You mention how the authors of the articles you cite mention other writers. It might be effective to introduce these individuals so that your audience is not confused. In terms of grammar, there should be a comma after “philosophers” in the first sentence. Score:

Literature Review: Research several types of information. Discuss several Pro and Cons positions by others and include at least 2 references for the Pro and Con arguments. This section should also clearly present both sides of the issue being discussed. Summarize the main issues on both sides by providing information on what the different sources say about the issue. Discuss at least two actual legal cases on your issue and their outcome.

When checking the validity of the literature making sure there is an author without a bias or an agenda is important in addition to making sure they have credible qualifications in the field they are writing about. In addition to this if it is important to note how to correctly reference the aforementioned literature to avoid plagiarism and to make sure the original author of the piece is correctly

To develop a personal toolkit for critiquing research article, critical thinking that imposes intellectual standards will be the fundamental strategy employed (Elder & Paul, 2008; “Public Library,” 2013). Critical thinking will be employed to minimize bias from the literature review, which should provide a more solid springboard for the dissertation process. The intellectual standards that will be employed are clarity, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, and breadth. Critical thinking should result in crucial questions and issues for potential research and the ability to articulate them clearly and accurately (Elder & Paul, 2008; “Public library,” 2013). In addition, before initiating a literature review, the focus, type, scope and academic discipline of articles will be determined (“Strategies for Writing,” n.d.). Focus will consider the thesis, predicament, or research question that will be researched. Type will determine if the search will highlight theory, methodology, or the kind of study, that is, qualitative or quantitative research. Scope will establish sources that will be considered such a range of research dates. Choosing an academic discipline such as business or psychology will help focus the search on literature germane to the dissertation goal (“Strategies for Writing,” n.d.).

It is therefore vital for students to be able to evaluate and critique research papers in order for them to regulate the validity of a study and to apply theories to practise. A research critique measures the value and importance of a study and this is going to be determined by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of the study (Brockopp & Tolsma, 2003, p. 400). Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its trustworthiness, and its value and relevance in a particular context (Astin 2009). The aim of this essay is to

I am in agreement with your process of critical appraisals; identifying the steps in the research process, determining the strengths and weaknesses in the studies and evaluating the validity and credibility of the studies seem to be the root elements of critical appraisals. I appreciated the scholarly article you chose linking depression and mortality among diabetes mellitus patients, particularly because of the straightforwardness of the article. it seemed the conclusion and points of the article were straight forward and the article was easy to understand. If I could suggest any addition, it would be a way to verify the credibility of the study. maybe in this study in particular there is not much incentive for lack of credibility, but in

The literature review “is the part of the thesis where there is extensive reference to related research and theory in your field; it is where connections are made between the source texts that you draw on and where you position yourself and your research among these sources”. (Ridley,2008).